Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Frank Reich was right / Frank Reich was wrong


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

That still would have been better than what we ended up with, though.

How much better is debatable, but it's hard to say it could have been worse.

And they would still have DJ Moore, a 2023 first round pick, and all the other picks gone due to the trade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

That still would have been better than what we ended up with, though.

How much better is debatable, but it's hard to say it could have been worse.

The question in this is did Reich really want Stroud?  If he did, and he had gotten Stroud, then I think he would still be our coach.  But all I have seen is supposition and conjecture, but if true and Tepper really did override Reich then all the bad things about Tepper are actually true.  I do hope the truth comes out eventually, as it would be interesting.  But I suppose it really doesn't matter at this point.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Any coach we hired still would have had Tepper as owner, Young as quarterback, etc. etc.

So you really see anyone who could have succeeded in that scenario?

But you're assuming Tepper/Fit demanded Young and that some other coach wouldn't have demanded his choice of QB as part of his contract. Playing the what if game leads nowhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frank was right to want CJ Stroud. He was right to want to bench Young,

Young dictated the offense. I mean, customized offense this years is so limited in its execution by the QB that it looks almost the same as last year. The passing chart and all. 
 

I think getting fired is fighting and losing. I don’t think he could have fought hard enough to make a dent in the hard heads running the show. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PantherKyle said:

Frank Reich is a bad HC. Was in Indy. And was here. Bryce is a bust. Both things can be true. Move on.

Not sold on the first point, at least not in the Xs and Os and the actual football stuff.

On the broader front, Reich probably needed to push back harder against both of his owners in some areas.

That's on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PantherKyle said:

Reich wanted Young. It's been reported by Fowler. 

Schefter and others reported him wanting Stroud.

I think the whole truth is most likely that if Reich had final say, he'd have taken Stroud. For all intents and purposes though, Reich was third (maybe even fourth)  in the chain of command.

Reich also isn't a muckraker, so most likely when it became clear that the organization was going with Young, he went along, publicly said all the right things and just hoped for the best.

The full behind the scenes story will likely never be known because Reich isn't the type to tell all.

While I respect that, I know I'm not alone in wishing that he would.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The question in this is did Reich really want Stroud?  If he did, and he had gotten Stroud, then I think he would still be our coach.  But all I have seen is supposition and conjecture, but if true and Tepper really did override Reich then all the bad things about Tepper are actually true.  I do hope the truth comes out eventually, as it would be interesting.  But I suppose it really doesn't matter at this point.  

I don't know that you necessarily have to involve Tepper.

It's pretty well known that Scott Fitterer wanted Young. And since he had final say on draft and roster decisions, yhat's who we were going to get unless Tepper stepped in and overruled him on Reich's behalf.

Based on the way Tepper talked about Young after their interview dinner, it's highly unlikely there was any chance of that happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

But you're assuming Tepper/Fit demanded Young and that some other coach wouldn't have demanded his choice of QB as part of his contract. Playing the what if game leads nowhere.

See above...

Fitterer was thoroughly sold on Young and had final say. The only way for him not to be the choice was if Tepper overruled it, and there's zero indication that he was inclined to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't know that you necessarily have to involve Tepper.

It's pretty well known that Scott Fitterer wanted Young. And since he had final say on draft and roster decisions, yhat's who we were going to get unless Tepper stepped in and overruled him on Reich's behalf.

Based on the way Tepper talked about Young after their interview dinner, it's highly unlikely there was any chance of that happening.

Sorry, I have erased Fitterer from my memory.  🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Schefter and others reported him wanting Stroud.

I think the whole truth is most likely that if Reich had final say, he'd have taken Stroud. For all intents and purposes though, Reich was third (maybe even fourth)  in the chain of command.

Reich also isn't a muckraker, so most likely when it became clear that the organization was going with Young, he went along, publicly said all the right things and just hoped for the best.

The full behind the scenes story will likely never be known because Reich isn't the type to tell all.

While I respect that, I know I'm not alone in wishing that he would.

Send the link that Schefter said he wanted Stroud

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, thennek said:

And they would still have DJ Moore, a 2023 first round pick, and all the other picks gone due to the trade. 

Yep.

I feel like with everything that was happening, the 2023 Panthers we're going to be an absolute disaster.

You had Fitterer with full roster control (and per stories, a willingness to undermine his head coach in an effort to save his own ass) pretty much selling the farm to get Bryce Young, which put us where we are now.

Then throw in David Tepper, who has of last year still believed that his involvement in football operations was a positive. As of this year, he says that's over. We'll see.

So yeah, it was gonna be awful. The only question is which head coach would have taken the fall for it. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...