Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it to early to revisit the Corral vs Malik Willis debate?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, csx said:

Looking at what was decided 2 coaches, 2 OCs, and a GM ago is not particularly relevant.

I'm a draft guy.. I feel like you look at every drafted player and personnel decision to see what went right and what went wrong. The decision to have Corral as QB 1 at that point like what made him there quarterback number 1? I believe we need to learn from our history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

I'm a draft guy.. I feel like you look at every drafted player and personnel decision to see what went right and what went wrong. The decision to have Corral as QB 1 at that point like what made him there quarterback number 1? I believe we need to learn from our history.

As mentioned before he wasn't available for us it's a moot point. Drafting him also wouldn't have avoided the Young catastrophe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt corral was a victim of the old Miss curse.  For some reason, they play extremely well and sharp while in school however, when they leave, they seem to have mental problems. I’m not sure I would take corral if I did I would be very careful.
 

by the way, the same thing happened to Chad Kelly. At the present time he is playing in the Canadian football league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Green-Ghost said:

Matt corral was a victim of the old Miss curse.  For some reason, they play extremely well and sharp while in school however, when they leave, they seem to have mental problems. I’m not sure I would take corral if I did I would be very careful.
 

by the way, the same thing happened to Chad Kelly. At the present time he is playing in the Canadian football league.

Eli Manning GIF by ADWEEK

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, micnificent28 said:

fair enough. I'm not sure what was the deal with our second rounder that year. But if you wanted the guy you pass in the first for ickey which okay is fair.. if u wanted him in the second you could have gotten back into the second round and same as the 3rd round when a lot of pundents had him as a first round pick. 

we had traded the 2nd round pick for Darnold. 

we just didn't have much draft ammo left. we got who we could get because fitterer was in on every deal.

even at that...we had to trade up to get Corral and i think we were lucky to be able to trade up even that far.

image.png.a46ccc7a6c483479ef542aed41e756b7.png

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bump Willis let's talk about Justin Fields!

 

You guys slaughtered me for bringing him up as a possible trade option. This kid is in a winning culture and he's simply winning games.

 

The scary part is he has a lot of potential to grow as a passer. Amazing what a good Oline can do to a QB. Fields was in a losing environment just like Caleb is. Sometimes your situation matters.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Bump Willis let's talk about Justin Fields!

 

You guys slaughtered me for bringing him up as a possible trade option. This kid is in a winning culture and he's simply winning games.

 

The scary part is he has a lot of potential to grow as a passer. Amazing what a good Oline can do to a QB. Fields was in a losing environment just like Caleb is. Sometimes your situation matters.

 

 

This is also a fair debate...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...