Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Serious Question/Quick Vent

ProcessBlue2

By ProcessBlue2,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WarHeel Mentor

WarHeel

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, travisura said:

We wear white too much imo, but it's mainly because they have an obsession with not wearing black early in the season. 

The worst uniform development recently was changing the metallic silver pants to a matte gray finish. Looks terrible and doesn't match the helmets.

Well it’s still hot as hell playing football in September, so that tracks.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Best thing about them was the Thanksgiving game.  I never liked the blue uniform though.  Even just the jersey when it was introduced around 2003-2004 ish?

Yeah. Somewhere floating around is a sweet pick of Luke running the INT back and you see Cam trailing him down the sideline with that big ole smile.  To me, that’s the blues.  Luke/Cam era.  Think that’s what I like them.  

think Luke was wearing them in that scary game he went down in too.  I obviously don’t like them because of that but when I think back about those big time players those blues were woven into the memory bank. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, CRA said:

Yeah. Somewhere floating around is a sweet pick of Luke running the INT back and you see Cam trailing him down the sideline with that big ole smile.  To me, that’s the blues.  Luke/Cam era.  Think that’s what I like them.  

think Luke was wearing them in that scary game he went down in too.  I obviously don’t like them because of that but when I think back about those big time players those blues were woven into the memory bank. 

I will say that the Blue color rush is better than the blue with grey pants like they wore when they debuted.  Hideous.

My favorite blue jersey combo is white pants, which I assume is not popular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....

      By TD alt · Posted

      First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Swaggasaurus
      An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....

      By Swaggasaurus · Posted

      Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
    • frankw
      2026 Charlotte Hornets

      By frankw · Posted

      Logically yes. Boston has the right balance though. Jalen Brown is #2 in the paint and their best shooters are 17th and 19th. While our best shooters are #1 and #2 and we have one player in the top 50 for points in the paint. And my understanding looking at the information I just referenced is we were basically at the exact same paint percentage last year in Charles Lee's offense. At the end of the day we either want to compete for a playoff series winner and the finals or we just want to stumble our way to another play in. We've already done that with James Borrego.
×
×
  • Create New...