Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you trade for Justin Fields?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I think his ability to run gives you a new element and extends drives. Dalton is one of the best in the league right now at downfield throws so the passing would regress a little but I'm not saying fields can't make throws. Dj moore had one of his best seasons with fields so I think he could also get the ball to  Johnson. 

Overall I would rather watch fields than Bryce. 

I guess the real question is to what end does this trade really make any sense?

Just sign him as a FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Might be easier to get him in a trade than as a free agent.  If the front office wants him.  

I rather doubt it, TBH. I suspect he isn't going to be a high priced FA. He wasn't sought after as a trade when Pittsburgh got him.

I would expect him to be somewhere in the range of price that Dalton was. $5-7 mil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

I guess the real question is to what end does this trade really make any sense?

Just sign him as a FA.

Bingo!

 

No need to trade assets for a guy who will be available in FA.

 

Hell I'm not a fan of this QB class. If we get the #1 pick why not trade it to the highest bidder. We need to load up on defense anyway.

 

Sign Fields for a cheap 3yr deal and go from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Bingo!

 

No need to trade assets for a guy who will be available in FA.

 

Hell I'm not a fan of this QB class. If we get the #1 pick why not trade it to the highest bidder. We need to load up on defense anyway.

 

Sign Fields for a cheap 3yr deal and go from there.

Eh....I mean....I am kind of scarred by recent trading down. I like the idea in theory. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, strato said:

If we could trade down not too far and pick up enough to get back in at the end of the first, it is something that would interest me. Depending on what things look like by that time as far as how what they might be able to do with the picks. 

Trade back with Vegas who will no doubt be all in on Sanders especially with the Brady connection who is now part owner. Sanders was also taking pics at the Vegas game with the Raiders owner.

 

Take them for everything they got.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
    • There's a reason Greg Maddux was never a flamethrower but still one of the most feared pitchers of all time, because accuracy beats velocity far more often then vice versa. Once you exceed a certain minimum capability, you can thrive with extreme traits elsewhere, its not strictly about power in any sport but powerlifting.
×
×
  • Create New...