Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is your definition of competitive next year?


pstall

Recommended Posts

Closeness of scores (not getting blown out), being in the neighborhood of a .500 record by year's end and while beating teams worse than us, defeating one or two who are better. That would be a competative season for me.

this sounds about right for the panthers next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 Teams fail every year by not winning the Super Bowl.

That is my underlying feelings.

That said. Some minor gains can be made that at least make fans feel better.

Panthers need >1 playoff win and a lot less of losing games they should win during the regular season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you going by record? By particular stats or what?

Just curious.

I expect us to hover around .500.

I think some will be prepared for what the defense shows us.....those that boast we have a solid secondary and a great young DL.....will see some reality. As the weakest DL in Fox stay in Carolina really shows why it is more important be strong there on a Fox team.....as the secondary struggles and we struggle again to stop the run. There is reason Carolina paid absurd money to Pep even though he didn't want to be here....he was all we had last year.

The offense will be awesome though.....most weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest silver82blade

to be competitive i think we have to come within two scores of each game, and if we get blown out we have to blow someone else out. we should also have at least a .500 record. for me to consider the season a success, we have to at least win the division or be conference champs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

to be competitive i think we have to come within two scores of each game, and if we get blown out we have to blow someone else out. we should also have at least a .500 record. for me to consider the season a success, we have to at least win the division or be conference champs.

agreed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...