Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What would a successful game for Young look like?

TN05

By TN05,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted

I'm not sure what it would look like.  Anything better than what he's shown so far would be an improvement. He would have to play lights out and have a couple of scoring drives before he ultimately flames out I guess. I don't think there is anything he can do to salvage his career here.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm not sure what it would look like.  Anything better than what he's shown so far would be an improvement. He would have to play lights out and have a couple of scoring drives before he ultimately flames out I guess. I don't think there is anything he can do to salvage his career here.

Pretty much. Young is done in Carolina.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CBDellinger said:

I get the sense the fans are more done with BY than the org is and I can sense your collective buttholes puckering as you all read this.

the Panthers have proven to be so massively dysfunctional there is no way to guess what they think and are doing.   

Org certainly looks done with him IMO.  And if they aren't done with him....they got horrible management plan for him. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CBDellinger said:

I get the sense the fans are more done with BY than the org is and I can sense your collective buttholes puckering as you all read this.

Yeah I have said that from the beginning. It's not up to the fans whether he stays or goes. Until the team gives up on him this is what you will see. Everyone knew as soon as Andy went down it was back to Young. I also said Andy only had about 4 games in him at best. It was inevitable that Young would start again this season. You were warned.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CBDellinger Mentor

CBDellinger

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

One has to be tone deaf if you believe that.  You probably should read the room a better.  Go listen to Dave's comments this week 

The same Dave that said definitively BY is our QB and less than 24 hrs later changed his tune?

C'mon now... dont let your emotions get in the way here.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

Yeah I have said that from the beginning. It's not up to the fans whether he stays or goes. Until the team gives up on him this is what you will see. Everyone knew as soon as Andy went down it was back to Young. I also said Andy only had about 4 games in him at best. It was inevitable that Young would start again this season. You were warned.

it can always get worse.  Wait to we get to the Plummer games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CBDellinger Mentor

CBDellinger

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

Yeah I have said that from the beginning. It's not up to the fans whether he stays or goes. Until the team gives up on him this is what you will see. Everyone knew as soon as Andy went down it was back to Young. I also said Andy only had about 4 games in him at best. It was inevitable that Young would start again this season. You were warned.

Exactly.  

They weren't tossing BY in the trash... they were trying to save him from himself.  Whether that works or not remains to be seen but they were gonna go back to BY eventually.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CBDellinger said:

Exactly.  

They weren't tossing BY in the trash... they were trying to save him from himself.  Whether that works or not remains to be seen but they were gonna go back to BY eventually.  

Disagree.   They aren't looking out of Bryce Young at this point.  It's the NFL.  Dave Canales is looking out of Dave Canales at this point.  That's how this thing works. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Disagree.   They aren't looking out of Bryce Young at this point.  It's the NFL.  Dave Canales is looking out of Dave Canales at this point.  That's how this thing works. 

I don't disagree with this theory. But the switch was inevitable. It's just that now it's for a different reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CBDellinger Mentor

CBDellinger

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, CRA said:

Disagree.   They aren't looking out of Bryce Young at this point.  It's the NFL.  Dave Canales is looking out of Dave Canales at this point.  That's how this thing works. 

The other Dave is calling the shots here and he's all about his ego and "investment" in BY.

Edited by CBDellinger
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...