Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I was ready to jump on Bryce about QBR & passer RTG, but...


TD alt
 Share

Recommended Posts

I know that plenty of people want to disregard stats in favor of the eye test and all that, and I've been guilty of it when it just doesn't support my narrative based upon observation, but you have to have some kind of way to judge these guys. I will say that QBR has been lauded as the better metric by many analysts (especially ESPN analysts), But passer rating is important as well, as you will see from perusing the last five games of these guys. What we can't see is, at least from these stats, is what I call the "win gene." Some guys are simply going to carry their teams to the win near the end of games (like Mahomes or Brady), and some just can't seem to get it done on a consistent basis. We also can't necessarily quantify from these images is how important the supporting casts are (from an offensive and defensive perspective) and how they affect a QB's overall passer rating and QBR, but we all know they play an important part, and I believe that it's not a mistake that the best QBs, especially the ones that push for championships, have solid supporting casts. 

 Bryce is making strides, but is not in the top echelons at this point, even during the last month or so.

Screenshot_20241230_125932_Chrome.thumb.jpg.750c5825904e52f2e1baead668e28377.jpg

I think Bryce has some failings for sure and I'm still highly skeptical of his height and how that impacts his ability to see the field which of course speaks to making the proper reads, ball placement and passing in general, but he may be able to hold his own among the big boys one day.

Plenty of people are still lauding Stroud and he has shown an ability to be an elite passer at times, but his decision making leaves a lot to be desired, and, honestly there may come a day (and it might not be that far off) that Bryce may surpass him, if nothing else at QB efficiency. If you're going to give Stroud grace, then you gotta give Bryce Grace as well. I don't care what Stroud looked like yesteryear, how's he looking now?

Screenshot_20241230_130031_Chrome.thumb.jpg.0a324d69fc6304cfddf2bfb3c0a93387.jpg

 

Pat Mahomes hasn't been very efficient this season, but there's a trend the last couple of games 📈 

Screenshot_20241230_130127_Chrome.thumb.jpg.b349345e5bc2631704bec0c2d1c236d2.jpg

 

And everyone has lauded Josh Allen 

Screenshot_20241230_130220_Chrome.thumb.jpg.4c3fc828d8387599983efddfed515831.jpg

Allen has been excellent, but has he really been better than Lamar Jackson?

Screenshot_20241230_130344_Chrome.thumb.jpg.2e8bdfc989d04d40ad7d7111f56b45bf.jpg

And, then there's Sam.  Darnold is carving teams up.

Screenshot_20241230_130707_Chrome.thumb.jpg.01e47b78d06d93d29470f7db61410c75.jpg

And last but not least is the so-called Joe Cool (which is impossible because this guy isn't 68 years old). Burrow is playing well, but he may be left on the outside looking in. Burrow's line has been letting him down, but he's still playing at a high level.

Screenshot_20241230_134515_Chrome.thumb.jpg.b0f122cb5d723676712d114011675485.jpg

 

So, again, there's only so much QBR and passer rating can tell you. But, I'd say that just looking at the numbers and reflecting upon the context of the situation, Bryce may be able to be that franchise QB that we've been looking for. It's not a stretch based upon his efficiency. But he has to keep improving and play to a level of consistency befitting of a QB1. That being said, he's going to have more games with a passer rating in the 100s if we can really expect to be legitimate contenders for championships. That QBR will have to rise as well. Whether he can raise his game to that level is anyone's guess, but with better personnel will likely come consistently better play...At least that's the hope. And yes, that is actual "hope" and not "cope" looking at his current efficiency level.

Edited by TD alt
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The list of truly franchise-altering QBs is a lot smaller than people think IMO. Half of the good QBs in the league now were either late-bloomers or just found the right situation/coach. 

Bryce has his faults, but he's improving. All things considered (the rookie contract) and the need to build this entire team? Bryce is one of the best options we can make for next year, and I'd argue there's only 10-12 guys we'd for sure take over him. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PanthersNCSU said:

The list of truly franchise-altering QBs is a lot smaller than people think IMO. Half of the good QBs in the league now were either late-bloomers or just found the right situation/coach. 

Bryce has his faults, but he's improving. All things considered (the rookie contract) and the need to build this entire team? Bryce is one of the best options we can make for next year, and I'd argue there's only 10-12 guys we'd for sure take over him. 

The elite class at QB is always pretty small. The second group is usually bigger, with the Goff/Cousins/Matt Ryan/Dak tier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, PanthersNCSU said:

...I'd argue there's only 10-12 guys we'd for sure take over him. 

Interesting. I still think that you may be saying this in light of what we spent to get him. But, maybe not.

Let me just say that after seeing Bryce's height, which I believe absolutely affects his play negatively, and to a lesser extent his arm strength, there are more guys on the list for me than that. Like the Tuna said, "He better walk on water," and Bryce hasn't done that. But taking just my general belief that a QB needs a little size (pun not intended) and just looking at the relative results, I can see your point. 

It may be a hot take, but I can even see keeping Bryce over Stroud if we're looking at the last half of the season. Stroud is not in the company of Mahomes, Jackson, Burrow, Allen, Goff, or even Darnold, Love or Mayfield. 

The jury is still out on him and Young.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Bryce has shown me, he belongs.  

Better than most will ever give him credit for. 

See, I understand your optimism on an emotional level, but on an intellectual level, I don't see how at this point you can come to that conclusion. Especially in reference to having the skills to win a ring. He may likely "belong" in the NFL, but that doesn't necessarily mean he should be our starter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TD alt said:

See, I understand your optimism on an emotional level, but on an intellectual level, I don't see how at this point you can come to that conclusion. Especially in reference to having the skills to win a ring. He may likely "belong" in the NFL, but that doesn't necessarily mean he should be our starter. 

Not emotional. 

Thanks for talking down to me. 

Have a good day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Not emotional. 

Thanks for talking down to me. 

Have a good day. 

I didn't realize that saying that I understood someone on an emotional level was "talking down" to them. You didn't really address the  point or answer the question that I was making. Wow, pantherclaw. Talking about being emotional for no damned good reason. But you do you.

Edited by TD alt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TD alt said:

I didn't realize that saying that I understood someone on an emotional level was "talking down" to them. You didn't really address the  point or answer the question that I was making. Wow, pantherclaw. Talking about being emotional for no damned good reason. But you do you.

You are making so.many assumptions. Incapable of even understanding what little has been said already. So i have no desire are debate with a wall. 

Nothing emotional about it at all.quite logical actually.

God Bless. 

Edited by pantherclaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pantherclaw said:

You are making so.many assumptions. Incapable of even understanding what little has been said already. Sominhave no desire are debate with a wall. 

Nothing emotional about it at all.quite logical actually.

Gos Bless. 

You're the one making assumptions, and I've been the main one talking in this thread, so if there is something that was said to be misunderstood, it was by me. Carry on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...