Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Way too early mock draft


Recommended Posts

Sitting here bored at work and watching these early mock drafts on YouTube so I tried my first one.  Did a couple trades that were offered. 

Traded down one spot with the Jets (7&38) for (6&55) and still got Graham. 

38 Edge  Old Miss Princely Umanmielen

73 Jalen Royals WR Utah St. Tall, fast and a good route runner. 

Thoughts on first try. 

 

 

20250105_101252.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Didn't notice but it wasn't Carter 

Copy i really would like to move down if we're not taking TMac or Will Johnson. I think the best of this draft is between picks 10-50 or so. So I would love as many picks in that window as possible 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

Copy i really would like to move down if we're not taking TMac or Will Johnson. I think the best of this draft is between picks 10-50 or so. So I would love as many picks in that window as possible 

I've been thinking about this too, and it would hurt not to get a top #5 hopefully generational talent; but I'd love if we could find a Future HOF and another Pro Bowl caliber player by trading back in the first. 

I don't think these prospects will warrant a team desperate to trade up though, I hope I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMG_2062.jpeg.badd0308e81596e5db78ea376b8703b6.jpeg

This is such a weak class

Teams boards are going to be all over the place 

After the first few names come off the board it’s a real crapshoot 

But I still want Luther Burden. I also wouldn’t rule out Malaki Starks for us 

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, *FreeFua* said:

IMG_2062.jpeg.badd0308e81596e5db78ea376b8703b6.jpeg

This is such a weak class

Teams boards are going to be all over the place 

After the first few names come off the board it’s a real crapshoot 

But I still want Luther Burden

I’m always hesitant to buy into analysts saying it is a “weak class” compared to last year. For example, some said the 2017 QB draft class was “weak”, yet we all know who came out of that draft class (Mahomes). Positional depth and strengthens can vary from draft to draft, but there are usually players who prove people wrong and go on to have great careers. So while I respect that some people view this class as “weaker” than last year, I’m sure there are players that can be difference makers and potentially be perennial pro bowlers.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Sitting here bored at work and watching these early mock drafts on YouTube so I tried my first one.  Did a couple trades that were offered. 

Traded down one spot with the Jets (7&38) for (6&55) and still got Graham. 

38 Edge  Old Miss Princely Umanmielen

73 Jalen Royals WR Utah St. Tall, fast and a good route runner. 

Thoughts on first try. 

 

 

20250105_101252.jpg

We need to come out of this draft with at least 1 good offensive weapon and as much defensive help as possible. I'd actually be ok with us not drafting a center this year with this being a weak center class and I feel that both Brady and Mayes both can be decent centers. We also have the option of resigning Corbett who should be pretty cheap considering his recent injury history but before he went down he was actually playing really well in his first year as a full-time center. 

Getting a healthy Derrick Brown back along with Mason Graham, A'shawn Robinson, Jaden Crumedy, and a veteran NT and we could be very nicely set up at Dline next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

IMG_2062.jpeg.badd0308e81596e5db78ea376b8703b6.jpeg

This is such a weak class

Teams boards are going to be all over the place 

After the first few names come off the board it’s a real crapshoot 

But I still want Luther Burden. I also wouldn’t rule out Malaki Starks for us 

Every class that doesn't have elite QB's at the top is always considered weak by the national media. This class has really good depth on the defense side of the ball and at RB. If both Mason Graham and Abdul Carter are gone by our pick I'd try to trade down and get extra picks to address our lack of talent on defense and our overall lack of depth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

IMG_2062.jpeg.badd0308e81596e5db78ea376b8703b6.jpeg

This is such a weak class

Teams boards are going to be all over the place 

After the first few names come off the board it’s a real crapshoot 

But I still want Luther Burden. I also wouldn’t rule out Malaki Starks for us 

The reason I chuckled when we won the Cardinals game and people were bent out of shape that it "ruined" our draft position.  I wouldn't be mad if we traded back, TBH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...