Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

8th pick


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Icege said:

I am trying so hard not to immediately mock Malaki Starks or Jalon Walker to the Panthers but it's SO DIFFICULT

if we could trade down to like 11 and get a 2nd rounder for this year that would be dope and land Starks. Thats assuming we miss out on Graham.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rodeo said:

The pick where we got CMC. Kuechly was at pick 9. I'm happy at this spot. Too low for the feeding frenzy over Deon Sanders' offspring and high enough to be sure we get a top tier guy.

There are reportedly multiple teams who think Shedeur Sanders isn't even a first rounder.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so the sos margin between the panthers and jets is razor thin, if they hand Miami a loss they’re likely to dip below us and maintain the spot ahead of us.

 

there are other opponents that they’ve played though currently playing like the vikings which could work in our favor  

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Growl said:

so the sos margin between the panthers and jets is razor thin, if they hand Miami a loss they’re likely to dip below us and maintain the spot ahead of us.

 

there are other opponents that they’ve played though currently playing like Denver and the rams. 

We need the Niners to beat the Cardinals which they’re not going to

Seattle beating LA doesn’t help either with us and the Saints being so close 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

We need the Niners to beat the Cardinals which they’re not going to

Seattle beating LA doesn’t help either with us and the Saints being so close 

I’ve tinkered with it to remove the common opponents we had, looks like the Vikings/lions game could determine it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

We need the Niners to beat the Cardinals which they’re not going to

Seattle beating LA doesn’t help either with us and the Saints being so close 

9pt game and Niners have the ball.  Jets are winning and no Tua for Miami

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay so we’re pulling for

 

-raiders (match win total)

-jets (match win total)

-49ers (vs ARI, to hurt our SOS)

-vikings (to improve the jets SOS)

-rams (as it pertains to New Orleans SOS)

Edited by Growl
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Growl said:

I’ve tinkered with it to remove the common opponents we had, looks like the Vikings/lions game could determine it 

Yeah seems that way. We’d need a Vikings win in order to leapfrog NY

As far as us and the Saints go… even if AZ wins and LA loses is that enough to tilt SOS in their favor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Yeah seems that way. We’d need a Vikings win in order to leapfrog NY

As far as us and the Saints go… even if AZ wins and LA loses is that enough to tilt SOS in their favor?

Two games probably 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

When I’ve checked in the past usually each game accounts for .002 but I’ve been wrong before and god knows I’ll be wrong again at some point 

Hope you’re right.

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...