Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dear Matt Moore,


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

Why does everyone always assume that you have to have only one player at any position? Like McNabb getting pissed when they drafted Kolb or people saying not to draft player x, because it would upset player y. How many starters actually make it through a whole season? How many starters play more than a few years. We have three good, young QBs that will play together and push each other for the starting role. Drafting Clausen doesn't mean they don't like Moore. It means they had a great opportunity to add quality depth to their team. Anyone who's against that, is against having a team that can play through the year and into the post season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still <3 you even if the Panthers don't. Let's grab a beer together, hang out, and talk about how jimmy clausen looks like an ostrich. First round is on me.

Love,

Cracka McNasty

I think the bird you are looking for is an Emu, its a nickname he has has since he was a Freshman at ND. It was given to him by the loving fans of the University of Southern California.

emu.jpg

And here's a side by side....separated at birth perhaps....

jimmyemu2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drafting Clausen doesn't really bother me irt Moore. But the fact that they were trying to make a deal and move up to get Clausen seems to indicate they are really not happy with Matt Moore for some reason. I guess that does explain why they stuck with Delhomme for so long even though Moore gave us a better shot at winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drafting Clausen doesn't really bother me irt Moore. But the fact that they were trying to make a deal and move up to get Clausen seems to indicate they are really not happy with Matt Moore for some reason. I guess that does explain why they stuck with Delhomme for so long even though Moore gave us a better shot at winning.

It could fall down to the fact that John Fox dose not like how Calm Matt Moore is. It was well known he did not like him last year so why would that change this year? Fox is the problem not Moore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the hell is wrong with you people, we are lucky as hell to get this guy in the second round...Im looking forward to the qb battle...may the best man win

the only problem i have with it is that clausen is probably going to be asking for a hefty pay, you know, cause he's a bitch and all, and I thought that was the exact opposite of what the panthers have been doing this whole offseason. it's almost hypocritical if you look at it that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...