Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Playoffs


 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Joe Bear said:

That’s always been Darnold’s weakness. He doesn’t take a checkdown for 5 yards, because of the minute chance he could get 30 yards. So he holds onto the ball and it bit him big-time against a defense that wouldn’t allow anything.

So, @frankw, since we’ve apparently decided it’s cool to quote me all the time, here’s one back for ya: 

If you’re this upset over me pointing out your “bust” takes in 2021 over Darnold weeks ago, somehow attributing that to me being a Darnold fan despite three weeks of my proving to you the purpose and result of such an exercise…

You’d take Bryce Young over Justin Herbert then, right? Because Justin Herbert put up big numbers in the regular season and folded historically in the Wild Card round. Since, @frankw, that apparently makes a player trash — or, at least worthy of quoting me every negative play — @frankw, tell us you’d rather have Bryce Young than Justin Herbert. Because that’s following the logic you’ve applied to this discussion, @frankw.

Nobody forced you to randomly call people out for rightfully criticizing Sam Darnold in 2021.

Now you're bothered because people are quoting you back? After calling others thin skinned?

And trying to pull Bryce Young into this?

Things aren't going well eh?

I hope you have a lovely Tuesday big guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at games like last night, I start wondering if there is some form of point shaving going on.  Getting sacked 9 times in spite of having two top tier receivers and a good receiving tight end?  I can't name one player from the Rams defense.  No way are they that good!

Edited by Matthias
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 He cost himself millions of dollars in the last six hours spent on a football field--like in the 30-40 million range. 

My diagnosis is this: The DCs looked at Jets Panthers tape and realized that they could get into his head--.  Sam Darnold is the quintessential front runner--a fair weather friend--the loudest singer in the choir at weddings and the lip sync master at funerals.

I would like to add that there were several sacks where I saw 2 or, at times, 3 OL looking dazed and confused.  A few times he had 2 OL not touch a defensive player. 

I think Darnold just became a Colt or Brown.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Nobody forced you to randomly call people out for rightfully criticizing Sam Darnold in 2021.

Now you're bothered because people are quoting you back? After calling others thin skinned?

And trying to pull Bryce Young into this?

Things aren't going well eh?

I hope you have a lovely Tuesday big guy.

Hold on a minute — you started quoting me incessantly when you got mad I found your ignorant old posts… but I’m the thin-skinned one?

Projecting, much? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Matthias said:

Looking at games like last night, I start wondering if there is some form of point shaving going on.  Getting sacked 9 times in spite of having two top tier receivers and a good receiving tight end?  I can't name one player from the Rams defense.  No way are they that good!

They actually have a solid very young DL that’s improving every week since Verse/Fiske are rookies. The Rams drafting has been amazing the last few years, the type of results we only dream about. Unfortunately, that 2nd we picked up from the Rams that we thought early in the season would be similar to ours is not pick 25-32 and quite a bit worse than the pick Chicago owns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Joe Bear said:

Hold on a minute — you started quoting me incessantly when you got mad I found your ignorant old posts… but I’m the thin-skinned one?

Projecting, much? 

Not to intervene--sometimes we can get pulled or pushed on here and it shifts from the Panthers to each other--but I respect both of your opinions--maybe some common ground, where you are 95% of the time?  I am out--just a thought.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

 He cost himself millions of dollars in the last six hours spent on a football field--like in the 30-40 million range. 

My diagnosis is this: The DCs looked at Jets Panthers tape and realized that they could get into his head--.  Sam Darnold is the quintessential front runner--a fair weather friend--the loudest singer in the choir at weddings and the lip sync master at funerals.

I would like to add that there were several sacks where I saw 2 or, at times, 3 OL looking dazed and confused.  A few times he had 2 OL not touch a defensive player. 

I think Darnold just became a Colt or Brown.

I didn’t watch but as an Aaron Jones fantasy owner, the lack of dump offs was astounding. I’m not sure it’s just Darnold because Jones and Akers had 6 total targets and 3 of those were on the last two drives late in the 4th quarter. Seems like O’Connell is adverse to calling screen plays. I always thought that screens were meant to slow down the rush. If your RBs have 3 targets for less than 10 yards before the game is actually over, it seems like you are playing into the hands of the defense.

If you don’t normally run screens at all, probably harder for Darnold to become a dump off guy. Just my two cents since Darnold did have 5 full games with CMC (he was hurt in game of 2 others) and they connected for 35 receptions in those 5 games. He did only have DJ and Chosen to throw to the rest of the time but we certainly game planned to throw to CMC and the Vikings clearly weren’t targeting RBs until the end when it was already over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Not to intervene--sometimes we can get pulled or pushed on here and it shifts from the Panthers to each other--but I respect both of your opinions--maybe some common ground, where you are 95% of the time?  I am out--just a thought.

I appreciate your offer of an olive branch and I respect your opinions as well. With him, though, he has to have the last word in every discussion and has to be the smartest person in the room. I’m closer to the 100th person to point it out than the first.

When he isn’t, he starts projecting so much he may as well be an IMAX theatre. I have no issue with dropping a subject, but the most condescending, thin-skinned hypocrite on here needs to get checked if he’s gonna go around calling others thin-skinned or hypocritical.

It stemmed from me finding some condescending, poor opinions he posted about Darnold (could do the same thing for Mayfield or Young with a five-second Google search) and he got really, really triggered about it, and that persists after several weeks.

No one else I spotlighted even cared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matthias said:

Looking at games like last night, I start wondering if there is some form of point shaving going on.  Getting sacked 9 times in spite of having two top tier receivers and a good receiving tight end?  I can't name one player from the Rams defense.  No way are they that good!

No point shaving. Darnold held onto the ball way too long and he admitted it. Rams need some credit for playing as well as they did, though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Vikings just got dominated and Darnold wasn't or isn't good enough to climb out of the hole once the game starts getting out of hand...he perpetuates the panic. You could see it last night it seemed like the Vikings just wanted to get out of there in the 4th quarter. I hate hearing people just blast him though. 

 

I feel like the NFC is wide open. I'm hoping this weekends games are a lot more competitive than what we've seen. The college playoffs have been way more entertaining (and I'm not a big CFB fan)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

They gotta be pissed. Not just because they lost and never had a chance to compete but because now tagging him to trade him would be a huge risk. You might get stuck with him in the tag. They might have to let him walk for a comp pick now.

My guess this is Sam Darnold's last game as a Viking. It will be interesting to see where he ends up next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...