Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Morgan at the Shrine Bowl, talks about looking for players who are passionate (dawgs)


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, MHS831 said:

So the Panthers will have to ask themselves, "Would I take the Commanders' first and second and the 2026 second rounder for our first rounder?" 

Hell NO, Not moving from the 8th pick to 29th for two 2nds. Especially with one of those 2nds being next season. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

My bad. I've seen top 50 ranks with anywhere from 3 to 5 OT in them. Who knows what desperation will force a team to do in this draft. I feel confident that there are 3 nfl capable tackles in the top 50. Beyond that it's pure luck. There's some potential good guards among them though. 

I have not researched them because I have focused on Defense and WR, but what I have seen when I peeked (I would like a swing T) is not overwhelming.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Hell NO, Not moving from the 8th pick to 29th for two 2nds. Especially with one of those 2nds being next season. 

Yeah fug that. If we're moving back in the 1st to grab an extra 2nd it needs to be in the 40's, not even further behind our Rams pick at 57 lol. Those are basically 3rd rounders

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Hell NO, Not moving from the 8th pick to 29th for two 2nds. Especially with one of those 2nds being next season. 

I like to look at the draft in plateaus.  Where does the talent level in your areas of need drop?  Aside from QBs who are not really top 10 talents if you take the position and need away, I think Hunter, Graham, Carter, Jeanty and Johnson are on that top level.  Then there is a drop that goes through 20 or so.  29, in my mind, would be on the third level.  Gettlemen said, "2 dimes is worth less than a quarter."  So that is how I look at it--but if you have needs for 3 players....

Taking Graham with the first pick is probably the most sensible pick.  However, if he is not there, and you have Jeanty, Johnson, and TMac--do you take Johnson?  I think I would-but if you trade back and get a player like Kenneth Grant, Mike Green, or Shemar Stewart, is the difference between one of these players and Graham, for example, worth more than a second rounder this season and next season?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah fug that. If we're moving back in the 1st to grab an extra 2nd it needs to be in the 40's, not even further behind our Rams pick at 57 lol. Those are basically 3rd rounders

I used that example because it describes a pretty even trade--using the Johnson Trade Chart--just for hypothetical discussion.   I probably, however, would not do it--if they need a T that bad, they can bid high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Icege said:

I am so for trading back and being in range to land Green and/or Ezeiruaku.

 

Bro, I think green left the shrine and went home.....not for bad reasons, but some team draftearly must have asked him/agent to do use after a promised draft spot by GM. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

No. We don't pick again till the bottom of the second round. Good chance anybody close to greens talent will be all gone by then. We need blue chippers on defense not just depth, especially pass rush. 

me- Doctor Who Reaction GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I like to look at the draft in plateaus.  Where does the talent level in your areas of need drop?  Aside from QBs who are not really top 10 talents if you take the position and need away, I think Hunter, Graham, Carter, Jeanty and Johnson are on that top level.  Then there is a drop that goes through 20 or so.  29, in my mind, would be on the third level.  Gettlemen said, "2 dimes is worth less than a quarter."  So that is how I look at it--but if you have needs for 3 players....

Taking Graham with the first pick is probably the most sensible pick.  However, if he is not there, and you have Jeanty, Johnson, and TMac--do you take Johnson?  I think I would-but if you trade back and get a player like Kenneth Grant, Mike Green, or Shemar Stewart, is the difference between one of these players and Graham, for example, worth more than a second rounder this season and next season?  

We have no idea until they lace up in the NFL.....

If I am in charge of that trade im going to need next years first for them to move up and get a guy to help them get that much closer to a super bowl next season or they can kick rocks. I personally am not doing it for two 2nds with one being a future pick.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I think, at 8, there will be a player someone covets.  These top teams have few needs, so they might package a first and second and maybe a future pick to move up to take a player they covet.  Gonna think out loud here for a second--

Offensive tackle--I went to a site (randomly) that lists team needs in prioritized order. ELEVEN teams list OT as a priority.  (Ravens, Browns, Bears, Jets, Niners, Seahawks, Bucs, Chiefs, Packers, Commanders, Patriots, Rams).  IMO there are 2 elite OT prospects and probably 4 to 5 with first round grades.

I see Sanders and Ward (QB), Hunter (CB), Carter (Edge) and Johnson (CB) going in the top 7--Graham or TMac are probably likely to go next.  The Jets pick 7 and will not be picking a QB.  They will probably take OT Will Campbell.  At that time, there is one elite OT left and ELEVEN teams that need an OT.  Granted, some will address this need in free agency, but how many starting OTs are available? 

Now, consider you are the Chiefs, Seahawks, Packers, Bucs, or Ravens.  They have little to no cap space, so grabbing a stud OT in free agency is unlikely and there are not any.  You also realize that 10 or so picking before you need an OT.  Once the Jets take an OT---the Panther phones will be ringing--teams will target Kelvin Banks, OT Texas.  If they wait, they could hope that Josh Simmons (Ohio State) falls to them, but they are unlikely to wait for the unlikely. 

So the Panthers will have to ask themselves, "Would I take the Commanders' first and second and the 2026 second rounder for our first rounder?" 

We do not have a second rounder in 2026.  We'd pick 29th and 61st in 2025.  That would give the Panthers 3 picks in the first 61 picks.  So who might be there?

Let's say that Graham (DE Michigan) is available at #8.  Most say "No brainer."  But the Phone rings offering you two second rounders to move back 21 spots in round 1.  You have a lot of needs.  What could you get?

Estimates, based on Player Rankings:

  • 27. Derrick Harmon, DT, Oregon
  • 57. (from Rams--not part of trade)  Donovan Ezeiruaku, Edge, Boston College
  • 61. Maxwell Hairston, CB Kentucky (assuming Mike Jackson leaves--Hairston has been eye opening at the SR Bowl practices)

So basically, to give up on Graham, you get a good CB and a good DT and a future second rounder in a draft in which you had no second round.

 

 

Im been talking OT for weeks about being the key for that 8th pick. 

In fact I would not be totally against using it on one, but much prefer a close by team offer up a above normal package to draft a OT....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

Bro, I think green left the shrine and went home.....not for bad reasons, but some team draftearly must have asked him/agent to do use after a promised draft spot by GM. 

Easily one of the first five edge rushers off the board!

Possibly one of the first three... 👀

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

We have no idea until they lace up in the NFL.....

If I am in charge of that trade im going to need next years first for them to move up and get a guy to help them get that much closer to a super bowl next season or they can kick rocks. I personally am not doing it for two 2nds with one being a future pick.

Personally, I think this is a weird draft. I think the top is overrated and there are some gems that are not highly rated right now. Finding them is the challenge, and if you trade back, you better know where they are.  But, yeah, we have no definitive idea until they lace them up. 

Who would you select if Carter, Hunter, Graham, T-Mac, and Johnson were gone? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/28/2025 at 7:12 AM, mrcompletely11 said:

This trope is already played out.  Just draft good football players that aren't hurt.  And quit drafting project players

yea. Genuinely believe I could draft better than the panthers have these last years. I see good players I wanted them to draft go to other teams and have success while the panthers draft guys who don’t even play out their rookie contract. They are genuinely awful at drafting since Tepper took over 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...