Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh Norris: Panthers-Garrett Wilson trade options


Recommended Posts

Just now, jfra78 said:

You're glossing over that he had 1100 yards and 7tds last year which was the only season he had decent QB play. His rookie season he had 1100 yards with 4 different QBs

How am I glossing over that?  I'm not saying he's a bad player, I'm saying there are others better than him and he's not a Top 10 WR in this league now or even in the next handful of years.

Look at the QB situation just this past year for rookies in Nabers and Thomas, neither was good and you could argue Nabers' was worse than Wilson's.  If you want to just compare rookie seasons, I'd say even with a better QB, McConkey had a more impressive rookie season given it was a run first offense and he had better statistics despite missing a game.

Thielen had 1,014 yards last year with maybe the worst QB play for any team in the league over the last decade.  1k yards doesn't mean the same thing that it used to with the 17 game schedule and pass happy offenses in today's game.

And again, that glosses over my big issue with him, he's not a game breaker in the mold of a Jefferson, Chase, Nabers and he doesn't have the size to be a red zone monster either.  So his upside is capped because of both of those things.

He's very good, he's a #1 WR, no doubt about that.  But he's not a Top 10 WR and I don't think he even has that potential in him when you look at the rest of the young WRs in the league right now, too many of them bring things to the game that he just hasn't shown the ability to do yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

The odds that Garrett Wilson is at least as good as DJ Moore are a lot better than the odds that TMac is.  That’s just the reality of the situation.  It doesn’t mean that’s how it will turn out.  But I don’t need 10,000 words to make a simple observation.

It’s the mystery box phenomenon.  You’re a huge fan of the guy.  That’s cool.  But it’s gotten to a level that makes the Tarheel fans look unbiased.

My thoughts on T-Mac are completely irrelevant to the point I'm making at the moment.  Yes, I think T-Mac will be a better prospect, some may not agree, but that's a different discussion.

Right now it's pointing out that people here are WAY over valuing what Wilson is as a player and what his future potential is.  He's very good, he's a #1 WR, but I don't think he ever has Top 10 potential in him.

I'd be okay with trading the 8th pick for Wilson if T-Mac is off the board by then.  But even saying that, as much as I'm anti taking a raw prospect edge rusher at 8, I'd rather do that than trade that pick for Wilson and then give him an extension.

3 years in the league, hasn't missed a game, but the 2nd most yards he has in a game in his career is 115 yards.

In what world is that a Top 10 WR?!?!?!?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

My thoughts on T-Mac are completely irrelevant to the point I'm making at the moment.  Yes, I think T-Mac will be a better prospect, some may not agree, but that's a different discussion.

Right now it's pointing out that people here are WAY over valuing what Wilson is as a player and what his future potential is.  He's very good, he's a #1 WR, but I don't think he ever has Top 10 potential in him.

I'd be okay with trading the 8th pick for Wilson if T-Mac is off the board by then.  But even saying that, as much as I'm anti taking a raw prospect edge rusher at 8, I'd rather do that than trade that pick for Wilson and then give him an extension.

3 years in the league, hasn't missed a game, but the 2nd most yards he has in a game in his career is 115 yards.

In what world is that a Top 10 WR?!?!?!?!

I'm not sure who said he is a top 10 WR, I only said he is a proven #1 and I will take that over getting a maybe #1 who's best asset is something Bryce won't ever exploit.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

I'm not sure who said he is a top 10 WR, I only said he is a proven #1 and I will take that over getting a maybe #1 who's best asset is something Bryce won't ever exploit.  

Explain this part.

Because I don't think you logically can, as I've pointed out numerous times, what T-Mac does best is actually a PERFECT pairing for Bryce.

You go first as I'm very curious what you're going to say, I'll then counter.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tukafan21 said:

Explain this part.

Because I don't think you logically can, as I've pointed out numerous times, what T-Mac does best is actually a PERFECT pairing for Bryce.

You go first as I'm very curious what you're going to say, I'll then counter.

Bryce doesn't throw the 50/50 ball.  The best part of Bryces game is finding the open reciever with anticipation

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Can we stop mentioning Megatron and being a better WR than Mike Evans while talking about TMac it's embarrassing 

What's embarrassing is that you can't separate Evans' totality of his career statistics with any individual season(s).  Evans is a HOFer because of his consistently great play, but he has maybe 2 actual elite seasons in his career.  

Also that you can't seem to separate using one aspect of a particular player's game and saying someone is the best prospect at doing that since then, despite not even claiming that he's better than Calvin at said aspect of his game.

You hate when I say that about T-Mac having the best catch radius as a prospect since Calvin... so tell me this... what WR prospects have had a better catch radius than T-Mac since Calvin?

You hate that I use Calvin's name, even though I've never once compared T-Mac to him on the whole and am likely correct that since Calvin came into the league, if only looking at catch radius (the only thing I've ever compared T-Mac and Calvin with), T-Mac would be the best since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Bryce doesn't throw the 50/50 ball.  The best part of Bryces game is finding the open reciever with anticipation

Bryce makes every throw, one day morons are going to see this and respect his talent.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Bryce doesn't throw the 50/50 ball.  The best part of Bryces game is finding the open reciever with anticipation

So, two issues with that, the first is that the 50/50 ball (in general) is probably not T-Mac's best asset (although it is his 3rd).  And I say that "in general" because the deep ball is his best asset, which yes, part of which is the 50/50 aspect of the type of deep ball he specializes in.

The bigger issue is this... who the F*** on our team the last 2 years is a player Bryce would ever trust to throw a 50/50 ball to?!?!  That's not Thielen's game and it sure as hell isn't a pass Bryce is going to throw to XL, Coker, Johnson, or Chark.

T-Mac has 2 things that could be argued as his best assets.

His best being the deep ball and the other being his catch radius (with a close 3rd on contested catch ability).

There are two types of deep ball specialists in today's game, the Tyreek type who can run past the defense and the QB throws it as far as possible for them to run under, and the Mike Evans type where the QB chucks it and it's up to the WR to out jump and high point the ball over the defender.

T-Mac is the latter and Bryce doesn't have the arm to properly use the former.  Hence why T-Mac's best ability, those deep jump balls, are PERFECT for Bryce, who can throw it 50-60 yards in a heave, but can't just out throw the defense for a speedster to run under it.

His catch radius is also a PERFECT fit for Bryce, again, because he doesn't have a rifle for an arm, but he's great at placing the ball where he wants with touch (it's actually probably Bryce's best asset).  Bryce throwing those high and outside throws towards the sideline paired with T-Mac's size, catch radius, and hands would be a lethal combination, particularly on 3rd down and in the Red Zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Wilson is known and a top WR.  I’d do this trade but would want a #2 next year.

Wilson would be a top 5 pick in this draft without question 

Throw every current WR in the league into a new draft of only WRs and I honestly don't think Wilson is getting taken in the Top 15, certainly not in the Top 10.

If you want to argue that Wilson's floor is higher than T-Mac's because he's already proven to be a 1k yard WR in the league, I'll accept that on the basis of proven vs potential alone.  

But T-Mac's ceiling is 100% higher than Wilson's and it's not even close.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

What's embarrassing is that you can't separate Evans' totality of his career statistics with any individual season(s).  Evans is a HOFer because of his consistently great play, but he has maybe 2 actual elite seasons in his career.  

Also that you can't seem to separate using one aspect of a particular player's game and saying someone is the best prospect at doing that since then, despite not even claiming that he's better than Calvin at said aspect of his game.

You hate when I say that about T-Mac having the best catch radius as a prospect since Calvin... so tell me this... what WR prospects have had a better catch radius than T-Mac since Calvin?

You hate that I use Calvin's name, even though I've never once compared T-Mac to him on the whole and am likely correct that since Calvin came into the league, if only looking at catch radius (the only thing I've ever compared T-Mac and Calvin with), T-Mac would be the best since then.

Nah it's pretty embarrassing that your calling him a better receiving talent than Mike Evans when he's not even a better draft prospect. Let alone the 100 touchdowns and 12000 odd yards 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Looking Back at the 2021 Panthers Draft Class An NFL player's career on average is said to last just slightly over three years, and because of that, it's considered a general rule of thumb that by Year 3, a team knows what kind of professional football player a pick has developed into. While there are always exceptions to the rule, that's not the point of this topic. This is about the players who are still on the team after being picked up in the 2021 draft (or as UDFAs). Only four remain on the roster today: Jaycee Horn, Chuba Hubbard, Tommy Tremble, and Brady Christensen. Two of them signed significant contract extensions with the team (Horn, Hubbard) while the other two (Tremble, Christensen) received short-term deals that aren't cap-heavy. It's worth mentioning the conditions these guys entered the league under Matt Rhule's second year and Scott Fitterer's first. A ton of players were brought in that year, including a long snapper who didn't make the team… instead of Trey Smith, who just happens to be the Chiefs' starting guard (hey... to be fair to Thomas Fletcher, he did have a fun draft day phone call). These four survived Rhule and Reich and were seen as valuable enough under the first-year combo of Morgan and Canales to be rewarded with second deals. Jaycee Horn (Round 1, Pick 8.) Horn has all of the traits of a true CB1: elite footwork, physicality, and the ability to mirror WR1s... but his biggest challenge has been staying on the field. He's never finished an entire season, though to be fair, it's been rumored he wouldn’t have been shut down for the final two weeks of last season had the team been in playoff contention. He's got just 37 career games played over four seasons (with 15 of those coming in Morgan/Canales' Year 1). The team gambled on his production after seeing that not only can he lock down WR1s in man or match quarters, but he can also be dependable in a heavy cover-3 zone scheme like what the Panthers ran last season. With the recent free agent and draft additions made this offseason, expect Jaycee to go back to eliminating WR1s from the game rather than shutting down a third of the field like he was recently asked to do. Chuba Hubbard (Round 4, Pick 126) Originally seen as a depth pick with linear speed, Hubbard has outperformed expectations and emerged as the team's RB1 over the past couple of years. His 2023 breakout laid the foundation, but in 2024 he cemented his role as the lead back, showing much-improved vision, contact balance, and decisiveness in outside zone. He finished top-10 in missed tackles forced and yards after contact per attempt, all while holding his own in pass protection and producing on screens. Chuba doesn't have elite burst or wiggle, but he's carved out a spot as the leader and tone-setter in the run game. Not bad value for a Day 3 selection—positional value be damned. Tommy Tremble (Round 3, Pick 83) Tremble has been the kind of player every team needs but few talk about: dependable, physical, and quietly versatile. When he was drafted, he was already known for his blocking chops and has steadily improved as a receiver. He experienced his most complete season in 2024 with a 79.3% catch rate, 10.2 yards per reception, no drops, and a 108.9 passer rating when targeted. Not only that, he's been a consistent special teamer since coming into the league. He's a natural fit as a TE/FB hybrid in 12 and 13 personnel, consistently handling the dirty work in both run and pass situations. Brady Christensen (Round 3, Pick 70) BC has played all over the line both as a starter and as a back-up. We haven't seen the "short arms" come up as often as Rhule was worried about, especially against ATL and WAS where he logged over 100 snaps at center and posted his best grades of the year (76.0 OVR, 73.8 PBL, 75.8 RBLK vs. ATL; 85.2 OVR, 72.9 PBLK, 86.0 RBLK vs. WAS). While his overall pass-blocking grade (56.1) and lack of a consistent position might mean that he's the perfect OL6 rather than a long-term starter, he's been dependable when given his opportunities.
    • Fees nowadays are ridiculous. After purchasing concert tickets for my son’s 18th birthday and paying the rest of our HHI trip with 3 other families, I’m shocked at how much they are. Honestly, it’s grand theft. Some is taxes but in a world where everything is electronic, fees should be cheaper. Electrons don’t cost 10-30% of the event.
×
×
  • Create New...