Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SPOTRAC estimated contract value: CB Michael Jackson 3 years $23.15 million


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Mike played well above expectations last year, but I’m probably rolling the dice and letting him walk unless I’m planning on moving Horn.

We could be paying him at his peak--I dunno.  Josh Norman was a late bloomer--so you never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

Absolutely not. Way too expensive for a 28 year old player with limited starting experience. 2 years $7m is fair. He played well down the stretch but they can’t overpay for the CB position when Horn’s extension is coming up. 

Yeah, we have to keep in mind we don't have a ton of cap space. If Horn and Ikey are gonna get deals in the near future, we can't be too free with the cap space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is probably nothing--but Evans and Bartholomew, a pair of CBs from their PS, looked decent to good in the last game or two.  Still, you sign Jackson if you can--ask yourself, "Would you rather have Mike Jackson or DJ Wonnum?" $7 million savings to cut Wonnum.

 

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/7/2025 at 5:31 PM, frankw said:

Generally when I look at a thread I also take note of who created it. I see Juan's name I already know what time it is and enter accordingly.

mickey mouse troll GIF

Yeah, I appreciate Juan for digging and finding nuggets, but if you read his headline and then see his name beneath it, you do temper expectations.  I'd rather have him on the front lines, however, than not. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I always say, if you control the guaranteed money we can pay him a good salary without killing the cap as long as we don't keep trying to kick the can down the road with dead money if he doesn't work out. We need some stability at corner and this would go a long way to shoring up the position. We learned with Gettleman that you can't do a fruit bowl turnover of players every year unless you want to have a team that can't put together consecutive winning seasons. Under Tepper we got worse and can't seem to even have one winning season. We need consistent staff and players to build a culture and our talent. With our QB on a rookie contract we need to lock in other positions before he takes up a big chunk of the cap space. And how about limiting the dead cap money we seen to keep oozing as we let guys go or trade them...

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

It is probably nothing--but Evans and Bartholomew, a pair of CBs from their PS, looked decent to good in the last game or two.  Still, you sign Jackson if you can--ask yourself, "Would you rather have Mike Jackson or DJ Wonnum?" $7 million savings to cut Wonnum.

 

Easily rather have Jackson

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/9/2025 at 6:40 AM, hepcat said:

Absolutely not. Way too expensive for a 28 year old player with limited starting experience. 2 years $7m is fair. He played well down the stretch but they can’t overpay for the CB position when Horn’s extension is coming up. 

Agreed. Dan Morgan got Mike Jackson for our 7th round LB I think he's confident he can find another low cost starter if he can't re-sign Mike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The pro bowl should be brought back, it should be in Honolulu with proper marketing and eyes on it, it should be the nfl subsidizing a week long vacation for guys with their families-with that the one big change to make is to get rid of the fan voting. Have each send a collection of five or six guys they deemed their best and if the rosters get a little wonky personnel-wise, that’s okay. That’s part of the fun. short of that, the only other thing I could recommend is having a similar set-up-no fan voting, teams selecting their best players, and sending them to compete against the chosen players from 31 other teams in real Olympic level sporting completions to see who comes out on top.   seeing the panthers delegates beat the disgusting saints delegates up for the Gold in the rowing competition or the 4x100 relay would actually feed into the competitive nature of fans and give them something to root for. you could even have under armour sell the logo cladded up team gear that the pros wear in these games for money, this stuff basically writes itself if the nfl wasn’t trying to use this event help sell the idea that no defense and lots of passing is a GOOD THING and you LOVE THIS and THE GAMES SHOULD BE MORE LIKE THIS. 
    • Been a while for Buhlockey...
    • Maybe let up on a Vinny T a bit, ya know, just in case... lol
×
×
  • Create New...