Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What top 10 prospect do you absolutely NOT want?


CanadianCat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Geez people are very passionate about Travis Hunter. He seems like a solid dude. I think he has a great deal of potential wherever he ends up.

For myself and my knowledge of Panthers draft history I'm ready to see us stop gambling on raw WR prospects and putting a much heavier emphasis on fundamentals ie route running and hands. But that's just me.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BullCityP said:

What part of Tets game makes you think he's a better NFL wr prospect than Hunter I'm really interested in hearing this?? What do you think he does that will translate better than what Hunter can do?

He has better hands, significantly larger catch radius (like absurdly so), and better at 50/50 balls for a start, while he also already runs a more full route tree that is already at an NFL level.

And before you say Hunter does those things well, I'm not saying he doesn't, but T-Mac is just better at them, just like Hunter is better at some things as well, such as pure speed/quickness and his ability to separate (and yes, separation and route running are two separate things, you can be a poor route runner but elite separator due to quick twitch ability).

T-Mac has 3 legitimate weaknesses, 2 of which are easily improved upon in the NFL with proper coaching, with the 3rd just being due to his size and is a trade off for what you get from his size.  

His get off at the snap and separation are two things that with coaching and just growing as a player, will get better.  Particularly because he's already an elite route runner, he just needs to improve his first couple steps after cutting to get that extra half step of separation.  

His raw top end speed will always be what it is, it's not elite like Hunter, but it's MORE than fast enough to be successful in the NFL, particularly due to all his other positives.  As I've noted before, he was clocked at 20.8 MPH (I think this was the number, not going back to find it right now though) during his first 2 seasons in college, which would have been the 8th fastest a player was clocked in an NFL game this past season.

You're taking these responses in this thread as if people are saying Hunter is a bum who couldn't cut it in the NFL as a WR if his life depended on it.  But we're really just saying he's a better CB prospect than WR, but even as a WR he's probably the 2nd or 3rd best prospect in the draft and still a 1st round pick.  We're also pointing out that you just can't ignore the wear and tear that his already thin frame has been put through by playing both ways for 3 years and the very legitimate concern about how he'll hold up long term in the NFL because of it, even if he only plays one side of the ball moving forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

He has better hands, significantly larger catch radius (like absurdly so), and better at 50/50 balls for a start, while he also already runs a more full route tree that is already at an NFL level.

And before you say Hunter does those things well, I'm not saying he doesn't, but T-Mac is just better at them, just like Hunter is better at some things as well, such as pure speed/quickness and his ability to separate (and yes, separation and route running are two separate things, you can be a poor route runner but elite separator due to quick twitch ability).

T-Mac has 3 legitimate weaknesses, 2 of which are easily improved upon in the NFL with proper coaching, with the 3rd just being due to his size and is a trade off for what you get from his size.  

His get off at the snap and separation are two things that with coaching and just growing as a player, will get better.  Particularly because he's already an elite route runner, he just needs to improve his first couple steps after cutting to get that extra half step of separation.  

His raw top end speed will always be what it is, it's not elite like Hunter, but it's MORE than fast enough to be successful in the NFL, particularly due to all his other positives.  As I've noted before, he was clocked at 20.8 MPH (I think this was the number, not going back to find it right now though) during his first 2 seasons in college, which would have been the 8th fastest a player was clocked in an NFL game this past season.

You're taking these responses in this thread as if people are saying Hunter is a bum who couldn't cut it in the NFL as a WR if his life depended on it.  But we're really just saying he's a better CB prospect than WR, but even as a WR he's probably the 2nd or 3rd best prospect in the draft and still a 1st round pick.  We're also pointing out that you just can't ignore the wear and tear that his already thin frame has been put through by playing both ways for 3 years and the very legitimate concern about how he'll hold up long term in the NFL because of it, even if he only plays one side of the ball moving forward.

I'm not saying ya'll think he's a scrub I just don't see how ya'll think any receiver in this class is a better prospect than him. With my GM hat on I'm not taking another WR or CB over him. I may be wrong but I doubt it dude is a BALLER. I called Nabers being a better prospect than MHJ. When I look at receiver prospects the first thing you look at is feet, footwork plus quick twitch and natural hands so looking at both players I just think Hunter is MUCH better. Top comp for both in my eyes is Evans for Tet and J Jefferson for Hunter and I'm picking JJ over Evans every day of the week in my opinion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because you're hung up on what he did on the college field vs. looking at how that translates to the NFL. He basically just out-athleted the competition as a WR at the college level. Watch him play CB and watch him play WR. You can't possibly argue that he looked anywhere near as natural and instinctive as a WR as he did at CB. I'm not talking about once the ball is in the air. He has elite ball skills. I'm talking about getting off the line, running the route, setting up the CB. He basically just lined up and was faster, quicker, and more agile than the guy covering him. There's no nuance to his game as a WR because he's not a WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Because you're hung up on what he did on the college field vs. looking at how that translates to the NFL. He basically just out-athleted the competition as a WR at the college level. Watch him play CB and watch him play WR. You can't possibly argue that he looked anywhere near as natural and instinctive as a WR as he did at CB. I'm not talking about once the ball is in the air. He has elite ball skills. I'm talking about getting off the line, running the route, setting up the CB. He basically just lined up and was faster, quicker, and more agile than the guy covering him. There's no nuance to his game as a WR because he's not a WR.

That's LITERALLY what you want as a prospect lol. You get the player who does the thing you CAN'T coach and you teach him the rest!! I don't see where he was having trouble getting off the line setting CB's up ect but hey maybe I missed something. If he locks in on one position dude can be a top 5 WR or CB and none of these other prospects give me top 5 vibes 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BullCityP said:

Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 

His route running is fine for college and his insane explosiveness and body control makes him very special. But he doesn’t have the full NFL route tree currently. I think he is that much more athletic than other players in college. In the NFL we will see. Either way, a day 1 elite CB starter imo. Huge ceiling guy at WR with immediate impact 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BullCityP said:

That's LITERALLY what you want as a prospect lol. You get the player who does the thing you CAN'T coach and you teach him the rest!! I don't see where he was having trouble getting off the line setting CB's up ect but hey maybe I missed something. If he locks in on one position dude can be a top 5 WR or CB and none of these other prospects give me top 5 vibes 

No it's not. LOL 

Jesus, I think we're dealing with a @CamWhoaaaCam alt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, BullCityP said:

That's LITERALLY what you want as a prospect lol. You get the player who does the thing you CAN'T coach and you teach him the rest!! I don't see where he was having trouble getting off the line setting CB's up ect but hey maybe I missed something. If he locks in on one position dude can be a top 5 WR or CB and none of these other prospects give me top 5 vibes 

This is LITERALLY the reason we're where we are at as a franchise, because we keep drafting guys with off the charts RAS scores but are raw and not as actually skilled on the field and don't end up panning out.

Again, I'm not saying that's going to be the case with Hunter, but it's what you're describing here.

There is this misconception amongst fans that anything can be just taught to physically talented players once they get to the NFL, but that is woefully flawed, if not just downright wrong.

It's actually very difficult to teach things to players once they reach the NFL, but what good coaching can do is take the players who already can do it, and make them better at it.  You can improve a players foot speed and ability to get into and out of cuts on their routes to create separation.  But you can't as easily teach the player to be a precise route runner who has the instincts needed to do it at a high level.

Which is why I put more weight behind the things T-Mac does well than Hunter, because T-Mac is an elite player more due to his skills where Hunter is one more due to his athleticism.

If you can't see the difference between those things, it's a you problem, but it's very real and accurate.  But what you can't argue is that it's exactly what has messed the Panthers up so much over the years by leaning into the high RAS score athletes who are raw as actual players and expecting us to be able to coach them up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Think third after nabers and Harrison. Thomas Jr wasn’t that hyped but obviously with what we know now he would be up there too 

That's what I was going to say too, he'd have been right there in contention with Odunze as the 3rd WR off the board.  

And you're correct, people are already forgetting Thomas Jr the prospect due to the season he had, just like people forget that Justin Jefferson was the 5th WR taken and the 22nd pick, not some surefire can't miss possible GOAT type of player that he's already turned into.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...