Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tyler Warren


Mistuh Jones
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

LoL at this guy being a Bowers. Complete lazy draft time BS.

Watch this and see what a TE that's worth a pick at 8. 

Warren looks solid but Bowers looked like a freaking stud.

I said it before but I view Warren as being on a slightly lower level than Bowers. Warren was the Penn State offense this past season while Bowers was a huge piece but had other high profile players helping out.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jayboogieman said:

I said it before but I view Warren as being on a slightly lower level than Bowers. Warren was the Penn State offense this past season while Bowers was a huge piece but had other high profile players helping out.

It more than slightly and it shows. The only thing Watren has on Bowers is size. Bowers blows him out in hands, speed, agility and acceleration.

All the school stuff really doesn't matter that much. Bowers came into the NFL and was his team's offense. Warren looks solid but he isn't near Bowers level. Don't draft guys for ehat they did in school but what they can do in the NFL. Body catches and lack of separation even at that level is a concern. Bowers was one handing it and dusting CBs. It's not close IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Waldo said:

LoL at this guy being a Bowers. Complete lazy draft time BS.

Watch this and see what a TE that's worth a pick at 8. 

Warren looks solid but Bowers looked like a freaking stud.

Bowers measured in at 6'3" 243lbs with Warren coming in at 6'6" 261lbs.

Lance Zierlein did Bowers' scouting report for NFL.com as well as Warren's this year. He's got Warren graded as a better prospect.

Bowers was an awesome prospect that's turned out to be an awesome pro so far. Warren has the potential to be even better.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Icege said:

Bowers measured in at 6'3" 243lbs with Warren coming in at 6'6" 261lbs.

Lance Zierlein did Bowers' scouting report for NFL.com as well as Warren's this year. He's got Warren graded as a better prospect.

Bowers was an awesome prospect that's turned out to be an awesome pro so far. Warren has the potential to be even better.

I don't see it. Looks like school hype too me. He is going to have to do much better at the combine than on that film to justify that kind of grade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

I don't see it. Looks like school hype too me. He is going to have to do much better at the combine than on that film to justify that kind of grade.

What games did you feel stuck out poorly on film? He looked like a man amongst boys vs. USC and Purdue and was clearly the best player on the Penn State offense in the postseason.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Waldo said:

It more than slightly and it shows. The only thing Watren has on Bowers is size. Bowers blows him out in hands, speed, agility and acceleration.

All the school stuff really doesn't matter that much. Bowers came into the NFL and was his team's offense. Warren looks solid but he isn't near Bowers level. Don't draft guys for ehat they did in school but what they can do in the NFL. Body catches and lack of separation even at that level is a concern. Bowers was one handing it and dusting CBs. It's not close IMO.

We're going to have to disagree. It's not just draft hype. I didn't watch every Penn St game, but I watched enough to see that Warren is the real deal. Now, that doesn't mean he'll be surefire HOFer not does it mean he'll be a bust. I can't see the future after all.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jayboogieman said:

We're going to have to disagree. It's not just draft hype. I didn't watch every Penn St game, but I watched enough to see that Warren is the real deal. Now, that doesn't mean he'll be surefire HOFer not does it mean he'll be a bust. I can't see the future after all.

Its not about seeing the future, its about processing the existing data to make a informed and educated hypothesis

Whoever picks him in the first simply has to know the odds are incredibly astronomical that he is going to perform up to his draft selection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Its not about seeing the future, its about processing the existing data to make a informed and educated hypothesis

Whoever picks him in the first simply has to know the odds are incredibly astronomical that he is going to perform up to his draft selection.

That holds true for every draft pick regardless of round

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

That holds true for every draft pick regardless of round

thats not true,  you have to play the odds and the odds say te's are bottom of the barrel in busting relative to where they were picked

 

We just did this, in 24 years 24 have been picked in the first round, in your opinion who was worthy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Waldo said:

LoL at this guy being a Bowers. Complete lazy draft time BS.

Watch this and see what a TE that's worth a pick at 8. 

Warren looks solid but Bowers looked like a freaking stud.

Apples and Oranges.

like comparing AB and Calvin Johnson.  Same position, different playing g styles and how their used 

Bowers is 6’3 235ish and used primarily if not just strictly as a pass catcher moved out from the slot

 

Warren is 6’6 260 more physical not finesse.  Who can be used as a blocker, but also moved out as a pass catcher.  
 

those Bowers highlights are good.  But for every big deep pass play you say Warren couldn’t do like that.  I can pull up Warren moving guys out of the way and pancaking guys in the run game while also making big contesting catches in the same game.  Something Bowes isn’t doing.

Edited by ncfan
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Shockey was 1st team All-Pro as a Rookie and a Probowler 3 out of his first 4 seasons.

his stats:   

Shockey had a combined 248 catches, 3000 yards and 17 tds his first 4 years.

 

He never had a 1000 yard season and never had double digit tds

 

Rookie year stats:  If thats all pro then sure

GP GS       Rec        Yds        Avg       Lng           TD
5      14      74        894        12.1        30

        2

 

If you think that is first round worthy then we have to agree to disagree

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
    • Well I guess he should stop playing football. This was his defining moment and chance to prove he was generational and he failed. What a waste of football life..
×
×
  • Create New...