Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers bringing back Tremble


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

PFF doesnt even have a grade on this mofo he is so insignificant

Let me be clear too, I don't in any way shape or form have an issue with re-signing Tremble or have any problem with a player....but he is basically a JAG. He isn't close to irreplaceable in terms of what he does on the field. Quite the opposite. 

It's the price tag I have an issue with. Keeping him around, 100% fine with that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

And every idiotic contract we give out half the fan base celebrates it like the organization has earned their trust by consistently fielding good teams for years. It's pretty bizarre. Fandom Stockholm Syndrome.

But then when Dan gets fired for being bad at his job, they will be the first ones piling on.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

But then when Dan gets fired for being bad at his job, they will be the first ones piling on.

I'm rooting for Dan. Loved him as a player and seems like a legitimately good dude but I'm not just going to fanboy what seems like obviously dumb moves.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, PadresPanthersFan said:

As a comp ancient ertz just got a 1 year $6.25 with $2.75 mill in incentives. So it seems that's the going rate for meh

So 2 years $10.5 and up to $16 with incentives isn't too bad

Ertz had 66 catches for 654 yards and 7tds last season.  That's almost more than Tremble has had in his 4 seasons combined. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ECHornet said:

The 2024 receiving yards for Ertz would equal ~84% of Tremble’s career yards. Tremble has a ways to go to be that level of ‘meh.’  At least the deal sounds better than on initial reports, as expected.  Here’s hoping Tremble hits his incentives. 

How would you compare Ertz's blocking to Tremble?  Ertz had a rep for being a weak blocker coming out of college.  He has improved, but is he equal to Tremble?  I don't know the answer.  However, I know that when you evaluate TEs, receiving is only part of the equation.  Tremble is a good lead blocker and is very effective blocking in space.  Since his receiving is improving and he is 24, I like this contract the more I think about it.  Tremble had only 249 yards or so, but he was targeted only 29 times.  That can be that he was in on running plays for the most part.  It can be QB confidence in you.  It can be that you weren't open---but he grabbed 23 of them.  That is nearly 80% of targets (a good percentage for NFL TEs is 70% and above, with the elite TEs often surpassing 80% of targets. 

By the way--who is the person catching Bryce's "walk off" pass?  I can't see his number? 

Untitled.jpg.19d7d7203f825536ec9429e6d6650c01.jpg

A: TT, baby.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

How would you compare Ertz's blocking to Tremble?  Ertz had a rep for being a weak blocker coming out of college.  He has improved, but is he equal to Tremble?  I don't know the answer.  However, I know that when you evaluate TEs, receiving is only part of the equation.  Tremble is a good lead blocker and is very effective blocking in space.  Since his receiving is improving and he is 24, I like this contract the more I think about it.  Tremble had only 249 yards or so, but he was targeted only 29 times.  That can be that he was in on running plays for the most part.  It can be QB confidence in you.  It can be that you weren't open---but he grabbed 23 of them.  That is nearly 80% of targets (a good percentage for NFL TEs is 70% and above, with the elite TEs often surpassing 80% of targets. 

By the way--who is the person catching Bryce's "walk off" pass?  I can't see his number? 

Untitled.jpg.19d7d7203f825536ec9429e6d6650c01.jpg

A: TT, baby.

He did double catch the really easy catch to be fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's say we draft Mason Taylor in the third round. We have a very solid TE group, imo, young as hell, at a cost to the taxpayers of about $10m or less for 2025. 

Tremble is your blocking TE.

Sanders is your pass catcher with upside

Taylor is your all around TE starter with upside out the arse.

Big picture, I see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tr3ach said:

He did double catch the really easy catch to be fair.

That should count for 2 TDs.  His hands were bad coming out of college--and they have improved.  I was a TE in college, and to me, the toughest catches were the ones that were coming straight towards you.  I would rather catch running and looking over one shoulder when you have a dominant hand in the process.  In fairness, others liked catching passes with their thumbs together in their chest.  I dunno.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm rooting for Dan. Loved him as a player and seems like a legitimately good dude but I'm not just going to fanboy what seems like obviously dumb moves.

This is why I really dislike having former players in roles with the team. You love them as players but if they fug up in these news roles and hurt the team, it's mixed emotions. And it is really hard to separate the two eras.

I will always love Dan the player.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

This is why I really dislike having former players in roles with the team. You love them as players but if they fug up in these news roles and hurt the team, it's mixed emotions. And it is really hard to separate the two eras.

I will always love Dan the player.

My father was an all-ACC and preseason All-American tight end at South Carolina when I was in the womb.  He tried coaching high school and Pop Warner, and he realized something.   It is difficult for someone who has skills that came naturally to teach others who do not have that natural ability how to develop that skill.  He said, "That is probably why the greatest athletes are not the greatest coaches. You can't describe how to achieve something that came naturally."  I found, as an educator, that the best teachers are often the worst mentors for new or weak teachers for the same reason.  I wonder if this applies to GM work?  I did not like the hire (Morgan) for that reason.  At least we can say this:  Our GM is not a former sports writer or minor league baseball player.  

I am waiting to see if Morgan develops a pattern.  Last year, if you consider the round, I think his best two picks were Wallace and Smith-Wade--defensive players.  However, Morgan was a 4-3 MLB and we are in the 3-4, a different animal for LBs--at least in theory.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

My father was an all-ACC and preseason All-American tight end at South Carolina when I was in the womb.  He tried coaching high school and Pop Warner, and he realized something.   It is difficult for someone who has skills that came naturally to teach others who do not have that natural ability how to develop that skill.  He said, "That is probably why the greatest athletes are not the greatest coaches. You can't describe how to achieve something that came naturally."  I found, as an educator, that the best teachers are often the worst mentors for new or weak teachers for the same reason.  I wonder if this applies to GM work?  I did not like the hire (Morgan) for that reason.  At least we can say this:  Our GM is not a former sports writer or minor league baseball player.  

I am waiting to see if Morgan develops a pattern.  Last year, if you consider the round, I think his best two picks were Wallace and Smith-Wade--defensive players.  However, Morgan was a 4-3 MLB and we are in the 3-4, a different animal for LBs--at least in theory.

Yeah, it I think it depends on the makeup of the person, as well. Larry Bird and Danny Ainge were very successful. John Lynch has been great. I would be willing to bet that Greg Olsen would be a fantastic coach/exec.

Some guys have that ability in them and some don't. Can you imagine how terrible Jordan would have been as a HC? Probably even worse than he was as a talent evaluator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This contract makes him the 22nd highest avg contract among TEs with potential to be top 16.

Gotta wonder if folks complaining about this and the Corbett deal just want to be miserable.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tr3ach said:

Ertz had 66 catches for 654 yards and 7tds last season.  That's almost more than Tremble has had in his 4 seasons combined. 

He also had the roty throwing it to him, is 34, will definitely not repeat those stats this year.

Tremble had one of the worst qbs throwing it to him ( bad bryce) is 24, is on the way up and got less $$. I bet this year receiving stat wise tremble and ertz will be a lot closer

Contracts should be part of what you did, but also what you hope they will do. It is a tricky balance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
    • On Panther's Wire too. No idea, just found it and trying to share. https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2025/06/15/nfl-free-agency-rumors-panthers-eagles-justin-simmons/84219881007/
×
×
  • Create New...