Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'd like to see......

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

pantherdad Rising Star

pantherdad

Posted
Posted

a formation with King and Rosario on either side of the OL, Barnidge out wide, sutton and J-Stew in I formation.

I think i would catgasm.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pantherclaw

The tight ends don't make up for a good, consistent receiver other than steve smith.

You don't think Rosario and Barnidge have come far enough along to become receiving threats along with Smith? Thats what I'm saying.... You get those TE's involved more,(particularly Rosario and Barnidge, King is your blocker) get some consistancy going with some short passes, then when the TE's get more attention than they should, he is gonna hit Smith with the kiss of death, everytime. (don't forget, we are still gonna run the ball like crazy)

This, from a few topics above. great minds must think alike.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
Posted

a formation with King and Rosario on either side of the OL, Barnidge out wide, sutton and J-Stew in I formation.

I think i would catgasm.

I want a formation with Angelina Jolie and Hayden on the sides with Scarlett Johnson wide and the Olsen twins in formation, but it isn't going to happen. Too many TEs for Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
Posted

I want a formation with Angelina Jolie and Hayden on the sides with Scarlett Johnson wide and the Olsen twins in formation, but it isn't going to happen. Too many TEs for Fox.

That's ridiculous. Everyone knows Jolie prefers to be spread out wide. I would, however, like to play QB and have Scarlett be my Center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherdad Rising Star

pantherdad

Posted
Posted

Pantherdad flappin his gums, when he completely missed the point of the post he quoted. Good stuff. Flap them some more.

hey dick, i didn't miss your point.....you asked about two consistant receivers, and i gave you my opinion. you don't like it? all i can say is get the f**k over it. you wanna cry about it some more? I'm sorry, i didn't know my reponses would make you all emotional....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raskle Contributor

Raskle

Posted
Posted

hey dick, i didn't miss your point.....you asked about two consistant receivers, and i gave you my opinion. you don't like it? all i can say is get the f**k over it. you wanna cry about it some more? I'm sorry, i didn't know my reponses would make you all emotional....

Seriously? You're going to call him a name when it was you who pulled his response from a totally separate thread and out of context? Then you proceed to follow it up with a "get over it"? Looks to me like it's you who is the only person crying and emotional here.

:rolleyes:

As to Zod's OP, I'd love to see the TE's more involved in the passing game. I just hope Fox willl allow Davidson to open up the field for these guys. They can obviously catch the ball well, so why not use one of their strengths? Seems silly not to, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherdad Rising Star

pantherdad

Posted
Posted

Seriously? You're going to call him a name when it was you who pulled his response from a totally separate thread and out of context? Then you proceed to follow it up with a "get over it"? Looks to me like it's you who is the only person crying and emotional here.

:rolleyes:

As to Zod's OP, I'd love to see the TE's more involved in the passing game. I just hope Fox willl allow Davidson to open up the field for these guys. They can obviously catch the ball well, so why not use one of their strengths? Seems silly not to, really.

yeah, i made a similar post on another thread....and it spilled over to this thread because of the similarity of the TE talk. so, no, i did not pull this out of context. i posted on the other thread that i would love to see consistant TE play incorporated with the WR position. how is that out of context. I'm sure pantherclawz is a big boy, he doesn't need you to hold his hand or be his message board back up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      Just to clarify: I'm not arguing that height or footwork can’t affect QB play. I'm asking how those concerns translate into measurable, consistent outcomes. That’s the standard we should be applying to all QBs, not just Bryce. If height is such a limitation, then we'd expect to see elevated batted passes or poor pressure evasion. Yet none of that shows up in the data. Bryce was one of the lowest in the league for batted passes and his 16.9 pressure-to-sack ratio is good enough for 9th out of all QBs with 300+ dropbacks. So if you believe footwork tied to height is a meaningful issue, what metric shows that because two that would aren't doing so? This isn't about denying flaws. It's about applying fair, consistent standards because otherwise we’re not evaluating performance which means that it's not analysis taking place... it's just going off of the vibes that somebody has consciously decided on. Citing one red zone play you remember doesn't provide that consistent standard. I don't say that to dismiss your memory, but to emphasize that anecdotal evidence (especially from an avowed skeptic) shouldn’t carry more weight than consistent tape or analytics. For example, there was recently dissonance over Bryce's deep ball accuracy where it was implied that he was inaccurate throwing 20+ yards. Yet, the data and film show otherwise. And I unfortunately have to still ask since you won't directly answer: What specific metrics do you believe matter when evaluating whether a QB is top-10? You've mentioned YPA and passing yards per game, and that's fair. If that's what you're prioritizing, then let's call that your criteria but clarity matters because it prevents moving goalposts when the data doesn’t match one's expectations. I appreciate the response and hope that your holiday weekend goes well also. ❤️
    • KillerKat
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By KillerKat · Posted

      Me too. I got other things I can do. Tie it up 2-2 and I will be back, but Im tired of watching us get swept.
    • carpanfan96
      First goal 25 Playoff Series

      By carpanfan96 · Posted

      Svechnikov and I'm voting cause I'm pissed. 
×
×
  • Create New...