Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'd like to see......


Zod

Recommended Posts

a formation with King and Rosario on either side of the OL, Barnidge out wide, sutton and J-Stew in I formation.

I think i would catgasm.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pantherclaw

The tight ends don't make up for a good, consistent receiver other than steve smith.

You don't think Rosario and Barnidge have come far enough along to become receiving threats along with Smith? Thats what I'm saying.... You get those TE's involved more,(particularly Rosario and Barnidge, King is your blocker) get some consistancy going with some short passes, then when the TE's get more attention than they should, he is gonna hit Smith with the kiss of death, everytime. (don't forget, we are still gonna run the ball like crazy)

This, from a few topics above. great minds must think alike.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a formation with King and Rosario on either side of the OL, Barnidge out wide, sutton and J-Stew in I formation.

I think i would catgasm.

I want a formation with Angelina Jolie and Hayden on the sides with Scarlett Johnson wide and the Olsen twins in formation, but it isn't going to happen. Too many TEs for Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want a formation with Angelina Jolie and Hayden on the sides with Scarlett Johnson wide and the Olsen twins in formation, but it isn't going to happen. Too many TEs for Fox.

That's ridiculous. Everyone knows Jolie prefers to be spread out wide. I would, however, like to play QB and have Scarlett be my Center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pantherdad flappin his gums, when he completely missed the point of the post he quoted. Good stuff. Flap them some more.

hey dick, i didn't miss your point.....you asked about two consistant receivers, and i gave you my opinion. you don't like it? all i can say is get the f**k over it. you wanna cry about it some more? I'm sorry, i didn't know my reponses would make you all emotional....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey dick, i didn't miss your point.....you asked about two consistant receivers, and i gave you my opinion. you don't like it? all i can say is get the f**k over it. you wanna cry about it some more? I'm sorry, i didn't know my reponses would make you all emotional....

Seriously? You're going to call him a name when it was you who pulled his response from a totally separate thread and out of context? Then you proceed to follow it up with a "get over it"? Looks to me like it's you who is the only person crying and emotional here.

:rolleyes:

As to Zod's OP, I'd love to see the TE's more involved in the passing game. I just hope Fox willl allow Davidson to open up the field for these guys. They can obviously catch the ball well, so why not use one of their strengths? Seems silly not to, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously? You're going to call him a name when it was you who pulled his response from a totally separate thread and out of context? Then you proceed to follow it up with a "get over it"? Looks to me like it's you who is the only person crying and emotional here.

:rolleyes:

As to Zod's OP, I'd love to see the TE's more involved in the passing game. I just hope Fox willl allow Davidson to open up the field for these guys. They can obviously catch the ball well, so why not use one of their strengths? Seems silly not to, really.

yeah, i made a similar post on another thread....and it spilled over to this thread because of the similarity of the TE talk. so, no, i did not pull this out of context. i posted on the other thread that i would love to see consistant TE play incorporated with the WR position. how is that out of context. I'm sure pantherclawz is a big boy, he doesn't need you to hold his hand or be his message board back up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's also worth noting that Cam himself said that he felt safer when running vs. sitting in the pocket because he could see the contact coming and could better prepare for it. A QB running the ball doesn't have to be a sledgehammer. He just has to be effective.
    • That Falcons game is about as good as it gets. Especially on the road. I know the Falcons defense was bad but he was cooking with Coker, an undrafted rookie get the bulk of the receptions. If your QB has 5 TDs and 0 turnovers he is playing like a top QB, yardage be damned. The big question for me is how consistently can be play the whole season?  I don’t expect a game like that every week, but I also don’t want to see any performances like the pre benching or that Cowboys game (which was bad post benching). Bryce’s best shot at being the guy is becoming a mini-Burrow who is about as consistent as you can get at the QB position.  The good news is this QB class should be a fun one. So hopefully Bryce becomes the guy, if not it’s a nice class to let DC pick his QB and they should come into a great situation with a good OL, RB, young talented WRs etc…
    • Bryce Young is far less risky with his body when he runs than Richardson and doesn’t take many unnecessary big hits. Was much more worried about injury when he had that abysmal OL his rookie season than I ever would be when he runs/scrambles. 500/10 seems like a fairly reasonable prediction considering he had 250/6 in 12 starts last season. Of course literally anybody CAN get hurt, it’s just that we were assured by many huddlers that it was a sure thing with Bryce Young that he wouldn’t make it to this point in his career without significant injuries.
×
×
  • Create New...