Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Okay- be real..


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

i havent been to TC at all and cant tell what they all look like- so help me out here, and be real..

Matt Moore has been in the league for 3 years now, right.. is he really leaps and bounds over Clausen?

Lemme say this though- i am all for Moore starting.. but by the time Clausen is in his 3rd year, shouldn't we expect him to be leaps and bounds over where Matt is now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clausen has the arm and the build of a good qb. Does he have the tools and talent to be good in this league I think so. But right now he Is a rookie and just watching him for the last 2 days I can tell u he has a lot of work to do and time will tell. In 3 yrs yes he might be an excellent NFL qb. But right now Matt Moore is leaps and bounds better then any qb on this team including clausen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In theory, as stated above, it should be that way. But we won't know for three years.

Moore in his rookie year was a beast in pre-season:

21 for 29 ( 72.4% ) and 182 yards, 1 TD and 0 INT. He did lose 2 fumbles though. So despite his completion ratio, he had a 1:2 TD to Turnover ratio.

In 2008 ( year 2 ) he sucked pretty badly:

35 of 65 ( 53.8% ), 389 yards, 0 TDs and 3 INT. He fumbled once this year though.

Last season in the preseason:

16 of 29 ( 55.2% ), 173 yards, 1 TD, 2 INT. Fumbling one time and losing it.

So in three years of preseason action he has 72 completions on 123 attempts which is a 58.5% completion percentage. He had 2 TDs in three preseasons to go along with 5 interceptions and 4 fumbles. Losing three total. Thats a 1:4 turnover ratio. If Clausen isn't a little bit better than this in preseasons for this and next year I will be supremely disappointed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

theoretically jamarcus russell is better than any QB on our team.

fact is you never know what is going to happen.

Well yeah; everyone knows that draft order is the only deciding factor in who the best quarterback is. Duh! :mad2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
    • Nah we just talking about giving a platform and normalizing predators (who both beat women) opinions and celebrating it if it fits your narrative.  If that's fun I'm fine being a miserable fug by not supporting P.O.S like that. N b4 you call me a libtard or some other dumb ish know I'm an Anarchist/Libertarian and believe both these dudes should get a complete ass whooping (at min) or something worse for what they have done to women in this world. 
×
×
  • Create New...