Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Richard Marshall to Safety?


Vagrant

Recommended Posts

With the way he has struggled in man coverage this year, does anybody think it would be a good idea to move him to safety as to better utilize his talents?

Godfrey was decent to average back there and Chris Harris could be replaced on passing downs... Marshall could be a good guy to do it.

That way we could try to bring in a CB to compete with Lucas for the starting slot and have Lucas in the nickel or cut him all together if he doesn't step it up.

Just a musing.... has anybody considered it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was kind of the point about Harris. It would be nice to have a guy like Marshall that could come in on passing situations and actually defend the pass. Marshall is strong against the run, a great tackler, and can lay the wood when the time calls for it. He seems like an ideal safety. Man coverage doesn't seem to suit him well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, what's the point of this thread? The coaching staff isn't considering it right now I'm pretty sure, and talking about moving Marshall to safety on The Huddle certainly is not going to persuade anyone to make that change.

What's the point of any thread? Don't like it, don't post in it. I'd also like to add that you have no idea what the coaching staff is considering, considering you're not on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with those who say we are not plaing the right scheme. I really thought we were going to go back to a man scheme when we brought in Lewis. He wasn't very good with a zone scheme in New York which got him fired before. But he had a good aggressive scheme as DC for Pittsburgh. I really thought we would institute a tough man scheme. I don't know whether it was that with little potential for pressure this year we went to a zone look to limit our losses and would have been more aggressive if we could generate more pressure or we are playing zone because we think it is a good scheme. I hope it is the former so that we can work on improving the line pressure and bring in a more aggressive man scheme. If it is the latter, then there is medicine out for delusions of grandeur. That is the only rational I could think of for why they came out with that weak crap and actually thought it would work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...