Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Running Teams in the NFL


Mother Grabber

Recommended Posts

This morning, his schmarminess, John Clayton, said that running teams in the NFL are good for 8-9 wins at best. Our beloved Panthers are perhaps the best 'running team' in the league, and no doubt one of the more obvious about it. Many of us, myself included, have complained about the Fox plan being too conservative and too single minded.

Perhaps he agrees? Afterall, we did put a lot of stock into the future of our passing game...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess he is pegging New Orleans and Dallas to 8 or 9 wins then. Both were top 10 in rushing last year, LOL. Cincinatti was one of the best running teams last year. Anyone think with 85 and TO, they won't throw more this year.

Most any team has to be able to pass and run at the same time. We ran so often last year because we really couldn't throw it very well with Delhomme. I expect that we will throw the ball alot more this year and open things up if we get good quarterback play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess he is pegging New Orleans and Dallas to 8 or 9 wins then. Both were top 10 in rushing last year, LOL. Cincinatti was one of the best running teams last year. Anyone think with 85 and TO, they won't throw more this year.

Most any team has to be able to pass and run at the same time. We ran so often last year because we really couldn't throw it very well with Delhomme. I expect that we will throw the ball alot more this year and open things up if we get good quarterback play.

Thats what it boils down too. Now Tennessee, thats different

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carolina alone shows that thought process is garbage.

2008- 12 wins

2009 - with some of the worst QB imaginable for the majority of the season we got 8 wins. With average QB play (not great or even good) Carolina wins easly 10 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats what it boils down too. Now Tennessee, thats different

Wouldn't be surprised if Tennessee has to pick up their passing game also. I don't know that Johnson has another year like last year in him. Look what happened to Turner in 2009. He might be injury prone after all the abuse he took last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that I agree with running teams automatically failing, but bringing up the Saints & Dallas doesn't help the argument. Both of those teams were top 10 in passing, which opened up their run game a lot more than us.

It's a quarterback league, and will continue that way with the constant rule changes and etc benefiting quarterbacks. Look at the Jets. Their passing game was awful and they basically won 7 games, and were given the last 2 games with Colts/Bengals resting. Then you have teams like the Titans who didn't establish their passing offense until later in the season, and would have finished with a better record had they established it earlier.

If we can just get our passing offense to average, we'll be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that I agree with running teams automatically failing, but bringing up the Saints & Dallas doesn't help the argument. Both of those teams were top 10 in passing, which opened up their run game a lot more than us.

It's a quarterback league, and will continue that way with the constant rule changes and etc benefiting quarterbacks. Look at the Jets. Their passing game was awful and they basically won 7 games, and were given the last 2 games with Colts/Bengals resting. Then you have teams like the Titans who didn't establish their passing offense until later in the season, and would have finished with a better record had they established it earlier.

someone on Sirius NFL commented about teams focused on stopping the pass and the swing back to the run once teams realized some teams might be exposed.

If we can just get our passing offense to average, we'll be fine.

I think it is worth noting....that the league is constantly changing. It is a passing league and teams are building themselves to stop it. At the same time it will be more difficult for teams to stop teams focued on the power run building for speed/coverage.

With Jake's play teams often put 9 in the box last year. We had 2 RBs at over 5 yards a pop. If not for turnovers that formula is very effective imo in today's NFL with the focus on most defenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that I agree with running teams automatically failing, but bringing up the Saints & Dallas doesn't help the argument. Both of those teams were top 10 in passing, which opened up their run game a lot more than us.

It's a quarterback league, and will continue that way with the constant rule changes and etc benefiting quarterbacks. Look at the Jets. Their passing game was awful and they basically won 7 games, and were given the last 2 games with Colts/Bengals resting. Then you have teams like the Titans who didn't establish their passing offense until later in the season, and would have finished with a better record had they established it earlier.

If we can just get our passing offense to average, we'll be fine.

Our running game depends on passing also. We need to be able to keep the safety out of the box and have the DE worried about the pass which makes them susceptible to the draw. And the run sets up the play action pass. We need a good passing game this year so we can score lots of points. We lost several games last year because of an anemic offense. With the defense still up in the year, we need to be able to win a few shootouts this year.

I agree we don't need to throw for 300 yards a game, but we will have to score 24-30 points to beat Atlanta or New Orleans this year.

And bringing up Dallas and New Orleans shows that the best teams can run and throw the ball. One side helps the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roflcopter. We got those 8 wins last year with the worst QB in the league and an unreal amount of turnovers. With a middle-of-the-road QB we would have won 10-12 games easily last year. This year with an easy schedule it's not at all unreasonable to think we can win 10. Clayton sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is worth noting....that the league is constantly changing. It is a passing league and teams are building themselves to stop it. At the same time it will be more difficult for teams to stop teams focued on the power run building for speed/coverage.

With Jake's play teams often put 9 in the box last year. We had 2 RBs at over 5 yards a pop. If not for turnovers that formula is very effective imo in today's NFL with the focus on most defenses.

That is a good point. With teams going to lighter faster DEs and DTs to get pressure, it allows a team like us with a very big offensive line to just blow folks off the line. Teams focusing solely on the pass play right into our hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...