Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

John Clayton (ESPN) ranks the QBs


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

Well, after the first 5 games they were 3-8 and one of those wins over the lowly Redskins so you decide how long they were going down hill.

If you seriously think a team that goes 3-8 in the last 11 games were not going south then...

I admit the Giants were struggling going into the bye but alot of that had to do with Eli struggling. His passer rating in the 3 games against NO, AZ, and Phila leading into the bye was 54.6, he had 3 TD's and 6 int's. Like I said after the bye they were 3-2 leading into the game against us with wins over 2 of their division rivals and fighting for a playoff spot. I don't think 3-2 is a downhill spiral but I do think we sent them there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've taken the liberty of ranking some of the most popular football writers:

32. John Clayton, ESPN

Analysis: Rarely offers insightful or fact-based writings. A slow start this season could lead ESPN to replace Clayton with Mr. Peabody or the Cryptkeeper. No one would notice, save for the latter two would show more football knowledge.

Chance of being elite: Slim to none.

33. Mike Florio, Pro Football Talk

Analysis: Florio and his website post more mistakes than any other. Should he publish more erroneous statements this year, look for one Steve Smith to remind him of the rules and regulations of the game.

Chance of being elite: Slimmer to noner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just dont like that Moore got one quick line with no thought on it. "He is 6-2 as a starter" Well no kidding! But to think a slow start Clausen will replace him is stupid. The reason I brought Kolb up is his numbers are bad for his games and the only game he did good was against the Chiefs. Im sure Kolb will improve but to think he will come in and light it up and be good is unrealistic. He is going to struggle and Philly will be calling for his head.

Hey man I agree with you 100%, Moore will get his shot and he deserves it. You can't dispute the numbers he put up and if Clayton is basing it off preseason he is even a bigger idiot then I thought. Preseason there is no game planning, you don't want to show any of your plays, he is playing without Otah, Smitty, and Stewart. If you don't think that Smitty will make Moore, the other receivers, and the running backs more effective then you don't understand the game at all. Bottom line is Clayton is an idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giants were on a downhill slide, long, long before they hit our game. They had already given up 40+ pts in two other games, so the beatdown we gave them, was just another day at the office. They had the third worst defense, by the time they played us. There are other things going on in the NFL besides what happens in Charlotte. Giants currently have the worst defense in the league right now.

They weren't world beaters before they played us, but they at least stayed in the games they played. Matt Moore performed as well or better against them as some of his more well known peers did against that same Giants defense.

But the key point is that they had something to play for, they had no reason to give up. Maybe they were not flying as high as they were at 5-0, but it was our offense and defense that put the stake in the heart and killed them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just dont like that Moore got one quick line with no thought on it. "He is 6-2 as a starter" Well no kidding! But to think a slow start Clausen will replace him is stupid. The reason I brought Kolb up is his numbers are bad for his games and the only game he did good was against the Chiefs. Im sure Kolb will improve but to think he will come in and light it up and be good is unrealistic. He is going to struggle and Philly will be calling for his head.

I just don't understand why people who don't like what is said about Moore are always so quick to bring up Kolb as a comparison? I agree that Moore is not given the respect that he probably deserves, but why the comparison to Kolb all the time? I just don't see the relevance.

Maybe it is because Kolb's future in the media's perspective is so bright but there is reason for that. Sure he will struggle in the beginning, but Andy Reid who is one of the most respected coaches in the league got rid of a Pro Bowl QB because he thought Kolb gives them a better chance at success. He is the text book west coast QB and has been groomed to fill this role for a few years now. Will he be a success? No one knows.

Right or wrong, people see Kolb as the next 'possible' Aaron Rodgers on a high profile team and people see Matt Moore as the guy who replaced the interception machine Jake Delhomme and the stop-gap until Clausen is ready to take over the show for a young and rebuilding Panthers team. Not saying it is right, but that is just the way it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't understand why people who don't like what is said about Moore are always so quick to bring up Kolb as a comparison? I agree that Moore is not given the respect that he probably deserves, but why the comparison to Kolb all the time? I just don't see the relevance.

Maybe it is because Kolb's future in the media's perspective is so bright but there is reason for that. Sure he will struggle in the beginning, but Andy Reid who is one of the most respected coaches in the league got rid of a Pro Bowl QB because he thought Kolb gives them a better chance at success. He is the text book west coast QB and has been groomed to fill this role for a few years now. Will he be a success? No one knows.

Right or wrong, people see Kolb as the next 'possible' Aaron Rodgers on a high profile team and people see Matt Moore as the guy who replaced the interception machine Jake Delhomme and the stop-gap until Clausen is ready to take over the show for a young and rebuilding Panthers team. Not saying it is right, but that is just the way it is.

I agree with this 100% Couldn't of said it better myself

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't understand why people who don't like what is said about Moore are always so quick to bring up Kolb as a comparison? I agree that Moore is not given the respect that he probably deserves, but why the comparison to Kolb all the time? I just don't see the relevance.

Maybe it is because Kolb's future in the media's perspective is so bright but there is reason for that. Sure he will struggle in the beginning, but Andy Reid who is one of the most respected coaches in the league got rid of a Pro Bowl QB because he thought Kolb gives them a better chance at success. He is the text book west coast QB and has been groomed to fill this role for a few years now. Will he be a success? No one knows.

Right or wrong, people see Kolb as the next 'possible' Aaron Rodgers on a high profile team and people see Matt Moore as the guy who replaced the interception machine Jake Delhomme and the stop-gap until Clausen is ready to take over the show for a young and rebuilding Panthers team. Not saying it is right, but that is just the way it is.

The reason that Kolb is used as a comparison is that both have had very limited action, and Kolb's win loss record is worse than Matt's.

What have you seen in Kolb that makes you think he is the next Aaron Rogers? Nothing. He may be a great QB, but his body of work is so limited that a judgement can't realistically be made. However, you and everyone else make the judgement on Moore that he is only a stop gap.

I am not saying that Matt Morre will be a great or elite QB. But, I have seen enough of him and Kolb to say that there is not enough body of work on either to make that judgement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair point....but, please enlighten me on the how Kolb has more potential as a QB. I am really interested in your perspective.

Well, from what I have seen, he does a few things that I think Matt really needs to work on; the most important of which is pocket awareness! Matt has zero! He cannot feel the blindside coming at all and it usually cost us. His passes seem to float, A LOT...nothing real crisp! To me he doesn't scan the field well, Matt that is. I have watched replays and at this point, IMO, Jimmy and Kolb are better at pocket awareness and scanning the field. Lets not even talk about mobility and the ability to make something happen out of nothing which Kolb also seems to have and, to me, Matt doesn't seem to have it! Those are just a few things that I THINK, but we all know what opinions are worth, especially around here ;)

Lets not forget, Kolb also plays in what is supposed to be a much tougher division! The toughest in football some would say!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, from what I have seen, he does a few things that I think Matt really needs to work on; the most important of which is pocket awareness! Matt has zero! He cannot feel the blindside coming at all and it usually cost us. His passes seem to float, A LOT...nothing real crisp! To me he doesn't scan the field well, Matt that is. I have watched replays and at this point, IMO, Jimmy and Kolb are better at pocket awareness and scanning the field. Lets not even talk about mobility and the ability to make something happen out of nothing which Kolb also seems to have and, to me, Matt doesn't seem to have it! Those are just a few things that I THINK, but we all know what opinions are worth, especially around here ;)

Lets not forget, Kolb also plays in what is supposed to be a much tougher division! The toughest in football some would say!

Moore has a better record against the NFC East than Kolb...he's actually played a game against an NFC East opponent!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if all things were judged by record only, Peyton Manning would have never touched another football after his rookie season!

See what I did there?

Yea, we all saw. You pulled something smelly and slimy from your ass and are trying to pass it off as relevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, from what I have seen, he does a few things that I think Matt really needs to work on; the most important of which is pocket awareness! Matt has zero! He cannot feel the blindside coming at all and it usually cost us. His passes seem to float, A LOT...nothing real crisp! To me he doesn't scan the field well, Matt that is. I have watched replays and at this point, IMO, Jimmy and Kolb are better at pocket awareness and scanning the field. Lets not even talk about mobility and the ability to make something happen out of nothing which Kolb also seems to have and, to me, Matt doesn't seem to have it! Those are just a few things that I THINK, but we all know what opinions are worth, especially around here ;)

Lets not forget, Kolb also plays in what is supposed to be a much tougher division! The toughest in football some would say!

Let me put it another way. I am not saying that Kolb will not be better than Moore, or that Kolb will be better than Moore.

There is a limited body of work on both. Kolb, just like Moore, has done nothing that supports the judgement that one will be better than the other. Both have done some nice things....and both have shown some weaknesses. Only time under center as a starting QB will tell.

That is why I find it humorous for people to consider one a sure thing and the other a stop gap. Typical bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean you can always talk good or bad in just about everything. 8 wins and leading poo mountain, this rookie class is a big reason. Think about no Tmac or Dan Morgan didn't make that trade to gain a future 2nd rounder. So after Pat Jones breaks his back, DJ " who's not on any roster or PS" Johnson would be starting. Gods knows how bad they already are- 32nd in sacks/pressure/PDs etc... Sure Prince, Trevor, Cam, and little Jimmy haven't done too much, but they are still here.  Honestly its not smart or wise to judge rookies, *unless pro-bowl or cut. Lets revisit this next year, there are slump sophomore years and the biggest jump in players careers most times happens in the 2nd full off-season. You see who wants to be NFL pro and who's happy with teppers checks. I know many of them will be getting surgeries, got to see how they attack that as well....Tmac is playing hurt currently, if they were out of the race, he would be IR'd and maybe half the rookie class as well....I thought Cam was headed for the IR. 
    • It actually looks pretty solid.  A few players to re-sign and three primary positions to upgrade (starters).  Beyond that, we don't have a bunch of holes or need to overpay free agents. this is how I see it (using OTC for the 2026 roster information) on December 22, 2025.  This is rather basic, focusing on the core needs. Blue: Potential players to re-sign in the offseason.  Green: Players under contract for the 2026 season.  Italics: Possible cap casualties Analysis   Offense:  Center:  First, sign Mays for the long term (He is 26–I’d give him a 3-4 year deal).  He is not great, but he is decent and we need consistency on the OL. He does not make stupid mistakes. While the draft is not great in the interior offensive line, signing a veteran who can backup G and C would be a strategy.   Guard:  Canalas seemed to be impressed with Curhan, as I was.  He will be 28 next year, so he has a few years in him. I think he comes cheap and is quality depth.  He can play center, but is perhaps best at G and T.  Valuable reserve.   Tackle:  While Nijman returns as the swing T behind Moton and Ekwonu, the Panthers need to start developing a RT to play behind Moton.  A late-round draft pick that is rough but has all the tools is ideal. As the fourth OT, he can develop behind some pretty good veterans.   Wide Receiver:  We need a playmaker to play opposite TMac.  I believe in Coker, but think he is the AT-type slot. He needs to be re-signed. XL cannot be counted on to step into that role.  He is not that familiar with the WR position and he does not seem to be a student of the game.  This is a strong WR draft. First or second round.   Tight End:  I dunno.  I can see us upgrading the position, but Tremble does a lot of stuff well aside from catching the ball.  Evans is a decent all-around TE, and Sanders has some upside.  I’d love a weapon, but add the WR.   Running Back:  If Dowdle wants to be here, how do you let him walk?  He will be 28, and most RBs hit the wall then.  He deserves a big contract, but 28-year old RBs on big deals don’t earn them.  Go with Hubbard, Brooks, and Etienne.  Build the OL and the backs get better.   Quarterback:  Well, Bryce is improving and his confidence is growing.  Look at how many other QBs have taken time to get it. He is going to be the QB, regardless.  I want a young QB behind him, not the Red Senior Citizen.     Overview: Free Agent Priorities are to re-sign Mays and Coker.  I have Dowdle in blue, but I would let him walk (for reasons provided).  Cuhran played well and is versatile and should be signed if possible.  Draft a developmental OT, a raw, late-round OT.  In the draft, take a WR in rounds 1 or 2.  The offense is in tact–little needs to be done.  Let the OL develop chemistry, sign Mays while he is entering his prime, and get a weapon opposite TMac.  Give Coker a long-term deal.    Defense: ILB;  With only Wallace on the 2026 payroll, this position needs to be addressed.  Rozeboom might be able to be re-signed. I think ILB will be addressed in free agency and the draft. ILB will be the second or third round pick.  We will re-sign Rozeboom and maybe Cherulus and another priority free agent.   Edge/OLB: Scourton seems to be the real deal, but Princely (needs to develop) and Jones II are role players.  The draft is LOADED at the edge rush position.  I expect a first or second round edge player to be taken.   Defensive Tackle:  We have some big salaries at DT, and with Brown on the field, you dont need stars beside him.  I think the team cuts Robinson to get $8.5m in cap room, especially since C Jackson seems to be ready.     Cornerback:  Morgan has done a tremendous job finding talent in the bargain bins at CB.  Smith-Wade has been very solid.  Thornton seems to be a find.  Mike Jackson is a solid pro.     Safety:  Ransom seems to be the heir apparent for the Scott job, and Moehrig gives them a very aggressive, violent pair of safeties.  I like the safeties in this draft, fwiw.  I expect a late round pick.   Overview:  The Panthers must address ILB and Edge as priorities.  The ILB could be a free agent, Rozeboom re-signing, and maybe a draft pick. However, they need a pass rush more than anything else.   This is a great draft for edge players; I would not be surprised to see Dan Morgan double dip at edge.  Depth at S.   As soon as the season is over, look for Morgan to re-sign Mays, Coker, Cuhran, and possibly Rozeboom and Dowdle.  That would lock up the starting C, #3/slot WR, versatile depth on the OL, and get your leading tackler back at ILB.  Three HUGE moves that sould not break the bank.   Free agency would be focused on adding an ILB and a Safety who can play FS in three-S or big nickel sets. The draft would target Edge, WR, and ILB on days 1 and 2. Day 3:  OT depth, S depth, ILB depth.  
    • Seattle is coming across country to our house which will be packed.  We can beat this damn team.  Agree @TheBigKat the team has improved tremendously from last season
×
×
  • Create New...