Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers keepers, sleepers, weepers


Laetitia

Recommended Posts

(By Darin Gantt, [email protected]) p//p

The Carolina Panthers’ exhibition finale against Pittsburgh tonight is the final chance for players on the bubble to make their cases.

In a few cases, the decisions are already made, but there’s a bit of wiggle room left at the bottom of the roster. Here’s a position-by-position look at who they could keep as they pare the roster from the current 75 to the regular-season limit of 53 by Saturday afternoon’s deadline:

Quarterbacks

Keep: Matt Moore, Jimmy Clausen, Hunter Cantwell. Cut: Tony Pike.

While there’s a school of thought that says there’s no way to stash Pike on the practice squad without him getting claimed by another team, it’s hard to look at 32 other rosters and see which one needs him on their 53. Cantwell is simply closer to being able to play in the short term, while Pike’s going to take a few years to get caught up to the NFL game. With Moore on a one-year deal, you need to keep the other three around in some capacity.

The one wrinkle could be if they decide to keep just two quarterbacks, which is possible but risky, though it would allow them to keep an extra somewhere else (keep reading).

Running backs

Keep: DeAngelo Williams, Jonathan Stewart, Tyrell Sutton, Mike Goodson. Cut: Josh Vaughan and Dantrell Savage

Read more: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/09/01/1661817/panthers-keepers-sleepers-weepers.html#ixzz0yMiMSSOX

More...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is Nic Harris more valuable than Todd Carter? I don't see Gettis getting cut. Why would we keep 10 DBs when half are hybrids? With Edwards and possibly Lafell and Gettis needing time to be brought along slowly, we need 6 WRs more than 10 DBs. I am not a big CJ Wilson fan. We have and like McClain and Pugh, who could start at CB for us next season. Munnerlyn, Gamble, and Marshall will be on the field 90% of the time. Do we really need the 4.65 speed of CJ Wilson? I see 5 Safeties because Hudson plays the S/LB combo position and Francisco is a special team ace. We do not need 5 CBs, however, when Pugh can play it in a pinch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure why he thinks we'd keep Cantwell over Pike on the basis that Cantwell is more ready to play if needed. If Moore goes down Clausen can step in and do fine. If, God forbid, we needed to go to our third quarterback then we sure as hell wouldn't give Cantwell the reigns. We'd probably pick up some old geezer (like Testaverde a few years back) to fill in. Pike is worth keeping around to see if he can develop a little bit. Cantwell has been a lot of hype but not impressive and doesn't look like he's going to get much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow I should have waited to read the whole article to respond. Gantt is retarded.

CHARLY MARTIN? I have an extremely hard time to believing we keep him over Moore, Gettis or Guy. All three of those guys have been more impressive than him.

Also, I might be wrong but I'm pretty sure we always keep nine defensive lineman (5 at DE and 4 at DT or vice versa) so I doubt we only keep 8 with all the rotation we'll be doing. And I just don't see the need to keep 7 linebackers (8 if you count Davis).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say we keep Charlie Martin and Aaron Francisco if they had not have been hurt the whole season. Maybe Martin sticks around since its only a borken hand but I just think Francisco is gone.

I always thought it was going to be Marcus Hudson or Aaron Francisco; not both. Tod Carter is also probably going to make the team. Then again I could be way off there.

Seven linebackers seems like a ridiculous amount especially with the chance that Thomas Davis could be back at somepoint in the year, however unlikely. I mean why keep Senn and Norwood when they are all so similiar? Both are strong bodies who can't pass defend.

I see us keeping 6 Receivers. Everyone knows I'm pulling for Gettis like crazy but I could see us bringing in someone else instead and putting Gettis on the PS.

Also I could see Irvin or Moore sneaking on the team. Irvin more than Moore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Point A: If Pugh is also a good CB, why do we need 5 corners?

Point B: We keep Nic Harris and let Carter go? Who will help the team the most?

Point C: Gettis has practice squad written all over him? 6'3" 218 and runs a 4.4?

Point D: If Jarrett still needs to be directed to his place in formations, if he runs 3 yard routes on 3rd and 8, if he has done nothing in 3 years or all preseason, if he runs the wrong routes so often that it risks interceptions and the QBs don't trust him, if he can't get open with Kris Jenkins covering him, how is it again that he should be on the team?

Point E: Charly Martin comments are valid. If he makes the team under the present circumstances, that makes sense. He will be a valuable addition to our WR corps. Mark these (profound) words!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...