Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sound Familiar

Proudiddy

By Proudiddy,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted

Fox would not say who would start against Cincinnati next week when the Panthers try to avoid starting 0-3 for the second consecutive season.

"Right now I don't think I can make that decision at this point. I don't think Matt's been benched by any stretch," Fox said. "Yet, we'll start whoever gives us the best chance to win next week."

Oh no.

Also, wonder if this could be trouble:

But at least one veteran offensive player thought Sunday might have signaled a changing of the guard.

Asked how the offense would change with Clausen running it, receiver Steve Smith said, "We're going to find out next week."

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/09/19/1704646/panthers-fall-to-0-2-moore-benched.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blackcatgrowl Newbie

blackcatgrowl

Posted
Posted

jump onto the Houston bandwagon already??

Why not? It's clear to me the Panther's don't give a poo about winning, why should I make them my primary focus the rest of the season?

Besides, I've actually liked the Texans for years. And since they have a real team that's showing up to win games, might as well cheer for a team that might have a Cinderella season.

If we can pull off a winning record, I'll change it back. Till then, Go Texans!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyclonus Newbie

Cyclonus

Posted
Posted

Why not? It's clear to me the Panther's don't give a poo about winning, why should I make them my primary focus the rest of the season?

Besides, I've actually liked the Texans for years. And since they have a real team that's showing up to win games, might as well cheer for a team that might have a Cinderella season.

If we can pull off a winning record, I'll change it back. Till then, Go Texans!

You're a douche. Go to the Texans board and stay there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
House Newbie

House

Posted
Posted

LOL.

So lets just pretend that Fox IS going to start Clausen next week, does anybody think that he would be helping him at all by acknowledging it a week before?

The worst thing Fox could do would be to come out the Sunday before the game is even played and straight telling Cinncy "Yeah, we are going to be starting our rookie next week".

At least at this point Cinncy won't be able to spend ALL week game-planning for Clausen. Although more than likely they will already be spending the majority of the week planning on it. Give the man a break.

Oh, and blackcatgrowl, you are a scrub. That is the nicest way I can imagine to put it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trucpfan Experienced

trucpfan

Posted
Posted

You shouldnt even call yourself a fan period. Anybody that flip flops like that sucks. Nothing personal.

Ohhhhh hell no that's some sucka poo you ride and die with your team no matter what. So if we have a bad season your a texans fan Ahhhhhhh I need like 4k.post so I can ban your ass. Tattoo I was the one giving you a lil poo after the game on twitter Ocutta. I'm not gonna be fake were real WEAK but we are my ONLY team black have more faith or don't come dick riding when we win the next 7 straight hmmmm no need to cry like I keep reading .

Edit** you get love if you went to games during the great debacle we call 1-15

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      Just to clarify: I'm not arguing that height or footwork can’t affect QB play. I'm asking how those concerns translate into measurable, consistent outcomes. That’s the standard we should be applying to all QBs, not just Bryce. If height is such a limitation, then we'd expect to see elevated batted passes or poor pressure evasion. Yet none of that shows up in the data. Bryce was one of the lowest in the league for batted passes and his 16.9 pressure-to-sack ratio is good enough for 9th out of all QBs with 300+ dropbacks. So if you believe footwork tied to height is a meaningful issue, what metric shows that because two that would aren't doing so? This isn't about denying flaws. It's about applying fair, consistent standards because otherwise we’re not evaluating performance which means that it's not analysis taking place... it's just going off of the vibes that somebody has consciously decided on. Citing one red zone play you remember doesn't provide that consistent standard. I don't say that to dismiss your memory, but to emphasize that anecdotal evidence (especially from an avowed skeptic) shouldn’t carry more weight than consistent tape or analytics. For example, there was recently dissonance over Bryce's deep ball accuracy where it was implied that he was inaccurate throwing 20+ yards. Yet, the data and film show otherwise. And I unfortunately have to still ask since you won't directly answer: What specific metrics do you believe matter when evaluating whether a QB is top-10? You've mentioned YPA and passing yards per game, and that's fair. If that's what you're prioritizing, then let's call that your criteria but clarity matters because it prevents moving goalposts when the data doesn’t match one's expectations. I appreciate the response and hope that your holiday weekend goes well also. ❤️
    • KillerKat
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By KillerKat · Posted

      Me too. I got other things I can do. Tie it up 2-2 and I will be back, but Im tired of watching us get swept.
    • carpanfan96
      First goal 25 Playoff Series

      By carpanfan96 · Posted

      Svechnikov and I'm voting cause I'm pissed. 
×
×
  • Create New...