Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bengals not giving Clausen much thought


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Per beat writer Paul Deener, interviewed on Frank and Buck.

The team reportedly feels comfortable going with 8 or 9 in the box and leaving corners Leon Hall and Jonathan Joseph on an island against Panther receivers. Clausen, he says, doesn't really scare them.

Naturally, we hope that proves to be a huge mistake. Objectively speaking though, is there any real reason for them to feel otherwise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its the correct way to gameplan... you never want to let a team beat you with their best player/strength. They want to make clausen throw the ball, they realize were pretty one dimensional, and want to exploit that. Great running teams can run even when gameplanned against, our o line needs to step up. But at the same time you gotta take what they are giving you, that will be clausens job this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has to prove he can push the ball down field.

I have no doubt he can throw the short stuff but I want to see a deep ball.

I don't. I want to see a turnover free game. Clausen's deep stuff ain't his strength and those CBs in Cincy are nasty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per beat writer Paul Deener, interviewed on Frank and Buck.

The team reportedly feels comfortable going with 8 or 9 in the box and leaving corners Leon Hall and Jonathan Joseph on an island against Panther receivers. Clausen, he says, doesn't really scare them.

Naturally, we hope that proves to be a huge mistake. Objectively speaking though, is there any real reason for them to feel otherwise?

This ties right into my first thread which didn't get a lot of love :confused: but it's cool I have to come harder next time. Panthers stomp bengals mark it down etc. they cant pay him to much attention with no ACTUAL TAPE on him we will win I repeat we will win this game because they cant take him serious untill he does something on the field to make them. Last year MM was in the same boat and the games were less meaningful but thats how football goes. If our qb doesnt stink it the f up we should win last week with four picks they still should have lost that game if you are lucky enough to have the ticket you would have seen 85 and 81 aren't really doing much gresham might make me break bottle or two but we will see soon enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think we have some revisionist around it here because of all the drama around Tepper's involvement. If you pull up any scouting report from the time you'll see the same take. WalterFootball's report sums up the media's thoughts on him well: "Young has everything the NFL is looking for in a quarterback except in terms of weight and height." He was the consensus top QB of his draft and the only real question mark they had about him was whether his body could hold up in the NFL. The infamous Steph Curry comparison the Panthers latched onto came from Albert Breer. The excuses I've heard for him are more anecdotal. Bryce Young's development is the only bullet point most NFL fans have on the Panthers right now. That and the coaching turnover. If you're not actually watching our games it's easy to believe this is just a dysfunctional organization that doesn't know how to unleash this talented Heisman winner.  I've seen media and fans alike run with that narrative way more than criticizing Young outright. Whenever we win there's flocks who use it as proof that the Panthers just need to be patient.  
    • So maybe 1-3 vs playoff teams, going by standings as of today. I guess that is an improvement.  We are just about improved enough to be in purgatory draft wise. It really isn’t so bad in the 1st unless you really want that top QB or maybe edge guy because there are usually plenty of good players at the top but it hurts you some as get deeper in the draft. 
×
×
  • Create New...