Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Clausen compared to other QBs first NFL start


XClown1986

Recommended Posts

First NFL start statistics:

Troy Aikman- 17/35 180 yards no TDs 2 INTs

Tom Brady- 13/23 168 yards no TDs no INTs (followed by 12/24 86 yds no TDs no INTs and 2 lost fumbles the next week)

Not time to press the panic button yet folks. Lets give him a couple of more games to get acclimated.

(Can edit and add more, just got lazy)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. He needs time and more games.

But we should also slow down the "Future of the Franchise" talk. Let's wait till he wins 2-3 games and start looking like Brady and Aikman started looking after they got their uglies out of the way before any more talk of Rookie of the Year awards or The Future.

Honestly I felt he wasn't ready yesterday. He wasn't ready as a starter despite Fox telling me he practiced just as much as Moore. Didn't look like he was ready for a full game just yet. But now that he's in, he should stay in.

Now at some point in the future I would like to see at least 1 win this year and I don't care who we have to put in or bench as QB to get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recently, that is. Stats from first start in the league. How does Pickles stack up on paper?

Matt Moore - 2007 against Seattle - 19/27, 208 yards, 0 TD, longest pass 54 yards, 0 INT

Joe Flacco - 2008 against Cincy - 15/29, 129 yards, 0 TD, longest pass 15 yards, 0 INT

Matt Ryan - 2008 against Detroit - 9/13, 161 yards, 1 TD, longest pas 62 yards, 0 INT

Matt Stafford - 2009 against New Orleans - 16/37, 205 yards, 0 TD, longest pass 64 yards, 3 INT

Mark Sanchez - 2009 against Houston - 18/31, 272 yards, 1 TD, longest pass 40 yards, 1 INT

Josh Freeman - 2009 against Green Bay - 14/31, 205 yards, 3 TD, longest pass 38 yards, 1 INT

Sam Bradford - 2010 against Arizona - 32/55, 253 yards, 1 TD, longest pass 39 yards, 3 INT

Jimmy Clausen - 2010 against Cincy - 16/33, 188 yards, 0 TD, longest pass 44 yards, 1 INT

..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's absurd they quit on Moore after 2 games in a year where the team is rebuilding yet stuck with Delhomme's poor play for nearly 2 years when the team was much stronger.

Moore and Clausen get blindsided 2-3 times a game and have terrible play calling and a stale running game going against them.

The fact they quit on Moore instead of fixing the play calling, run game and oline suggests they are incompetent and will simply throw Clausen to the wolves. I feel bad for Clausen. Hopefully with his mobility he will be able to avoid a serious injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's absurd they quit on Moore after 2 games in a year where the team is rebuilding yet stuck with Delhomme's poor play for nearly 2 years when the team was much stronger.

Moore and Clausen get blindsided 2-3 times a game and have terrible play calling and a stale running game going against them.

The fact they quit on Moore instead of fixing the play calling, run game and oline suggests they are incompetent and will simply throw Clausen to the wolves. I feel bad for Clausen. Hopefully with his mobility he will be able to avoid a serious injury.

i knew someone was going to say this....you know what the difference between delhomme and moore? while delhomme was a decent qb that got alot worse...moore is a NEVER was...he has never been good and does not have the history to fall back on...what are going to stick with a guy that you have never had faith in to begin with in the hopes that he suddenly plays better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding stats, also worth noting that Clausen finished with the same passer rating as Carson Palmer..actually a few ticks higher.

If the QB play was statistically equivalent, and one team won 20-7, there is obviously a lot else at play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i knew someone was going to say this....you know what the difference between delhomme and moore? while delhomme was a decent qb that got alot worse...moore is a NEVER was...he has never been good and does not have the history to fall back on...what are going to stick with a guy that you have never had faith in to begin with in the hopes that he suddenly plays better?

Moore played extremely well at the end of last season and played decent in a few appearances in 2007. Clausen made a few plays in preseason and in today's game but his QB rating is dreadful for every game he's played IIRC.

I think Moore and Clausen are both mediocre NFL QBs that won't do much without a well built offense around them which the Panthers don't have. At least Moore has had a good game before though.

Both QBs are young so I do not see the point in the QB change and giving a guy 2 starts before benching him is just weak unless he's losing games for you solely on his bad play.

This team is a joke though and it's pointless to argue about the stupid decisions this team repeatedly makes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...