Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Team Chemistry...


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

We have none. Individually across all positions, we have tons upon tons of talent. They don't seem to be playing like it though. Why? I don't know. maybe team chemistry.

Just my theory added to the long list of why we suck so horribly this year.

I really dont think chemistry is the problem. Im not saying that it isnt but what makes you think that there is no team unity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely chemistry is critical to a team and it is true right now we don't have any. Is it all veteran leadership? Some of it is for sure but not all. Each year teams have to build their own chemistry and it doesn't continue from one year to the next. On the other hand having veteran guys who have worked together before make it easier to develop that chemistry. Look at the offensive line for example. On the surface they have 3 veterans right now who have played together for some time. But the right side is new and there is little experience. You would think that wouldn't impact the left side though and yet Gross is having his worse year in some time. Coincidence? I don't think so. Kalil said it yesterday. The line is not playing together and it is lack of experience which is causing most of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the lack of older players, the young guys don't have very many people to rally to. If they're on one of few available veterans bad side, then they're not going to benefit very much.

We don't have many older guys to rally to. Smitty is a playmaker and a spark plug, not a leader. Beason is a leader. Clausen has the potential to be a leader. Neither are battle worn vets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe everyone looks unhappy because we are getting beat? not a lot of cohesion when so many parts are failing to do their job.

most teams look unified and like they have a lot of chemistry when they are winning. when they are losing....everything looks bad.

once a couple players start stepping up and making big plays, things will improve. once they win a game things will also improve. until those things are done, though...expect there to be little evidence of unity or chemistry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe everyone looks unhappy because we are getting beat? not a lot of cohesion when so many parts are failing to do their job.

most teams look unified and like they have a lot of chemistry when they are winning. when they are losing....everything looks bad.

once a couple players start stepping up and making big plays, things will improve. once they win a game things will also improve. until those things are done, though...expect there to be little evidence of unity or chemistry.

Took the words right out of my mouth. I think the exact same. When we are winning or even just in a good rythym, that seems to be when the players play the best and tend to see the "Chemistry". When we're turning the ball over constantly, it's hard to have that positive attitude. It's all about momentum and right now we have none. Once we start making big plays and getting in the end zone more, only then will you see the team come together again and the chemistry become more existent. Just my opinion of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

defensively we have played well enough to be 2-1 easily. I think that unit overall is looking good. I think special teams has been solid.

Fox + Davidson simply doesn't = offense. In 2008 we had guys just do some abusrd stuff....they weren't really put in great position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Took the words right out of my mouth. I think the exact same. When we are winning or even just in a good rythym, that seems to be when the players play the best and tend to see the "Chemistry". When we're turning the ball over constantly, it's hard to have that positive attitude. It's all about momentum and right now we have none. Once we start making big plays and getting in the end zone more, only then will you see the team come together again and the chemistry become more existent. Just my opinion of course.

yes but do wins lead to good chemistry or does good chemistry lead to wins? it's all a matter of perspective and what you believe leads to the next

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure it's really JUST "winning" persay, that develops chemistry. I think that making less mistakes and at least putting points on the board and having longer drives other than our notorious "3 and outs" would assist in the progression of chemistry just as well. Also making explosive plays for 30 yards or more. I also feel that with all the new players on our squad, maybe they haven't played with each other long enough yet to develop this "chemistry". Also, one thing for sure this year is, we are missing leadership. That's just as important in this league and it's something I feel we are struggling with. The only person that comes to mind when I think of leadership for our Panthers this year would be Jon Beason. I know Jake had a horrific year last year but, one thing for sure was he was a great leader and the team believed in him for many years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Scott Fowler from observer   An excerpt  from larger article gotta say, i am not sure what Canales or Young were  thinking in the final 2 mins  they both looked like they have never a 2 mon drill in their lives    Unprepared   Let’s just throw and hope was the strategy  Add to it,why leggett, the most unreliable receiver, was targeted so much during that drive is beyond me      With a chance to be unforgettable, Panthers’ final drive was one to forget BY SCOTT FOWLER [email protected] 4 hrs ago The Carolina Panthers lost again Sunday, 27-22 to Arizona, but let’s at least give them some credit for their heartbreaking creativity. This, at least, was not a rout like Week 1. Yes, the Panthers (0-2) did a whole lot of nothing through the beginning of the third quarter against Arizona (2-0), falling behind, 27-3. Then they did a whole lot of something, scoring 19 unanswered points under the direction of quarterback Bryce Young. Then the special teams recovered an onside kick by punter Sam Martin to, quite remarkably, get the ball back, down only 27-22 with 1:55 and 51 yards left to snag the win. And one timeout, too. After finishing three straight possessions with touchdowns, the Panthers would need to do it a fourth time to pull off what statistically would have been the largest comeback in franchise history. But while there was no quit in this team Sunday, there was no comeback either, and nothing but nonsense in that last “march,” which ended 46 yards away from the goal line. Let’s go through a little of that final drive for the Panthers, shall we? Young, who had played a horrible first quarter and then a terrific second half, reverted to first-quarter form. He was 0-for-6 on the drive. He only targeted Tetairoa McMillan, the rookie that is clearly the team’s best receiver, one time. When all else was failing, the option of throwing a jump ball to T-Mac — drafted No. 8 overall for exactly this sort of situation — should have been utilized. It wasn’t. Head coach Dave Canales suggested that the Cardinals started shifting their coverage toward McMillan. Said the rookie afterward to reporters when asked what the Cardinals did to limit him on the last drive: “I’m not too sure. It looked like regular defense to me. That last drive only lasted as long as it did because of three defensive penalties on Arizona, which kept Carolina in the game (defensive holding to negate what would have been a Young turnover; roughing the passer; offsides).   Now it is true that the Panthers’ offensive line was threadbare by then, with two starters out. This made the degree of difficulty harder for Young and everyone else. But the Cardinals defense was also banged up, as their defensive backs had been going down like dominoes. So how do you solve Arizona’s suddenly fearsome pass rush? Screens. Quick hitters. Chuba Hubbard in the flat. Maybe even a shovel pass to a tight end. There was plenty of time — what there wasn’t was plenty of yardage, nor enough flexibility from Canales. One of Young’s six incompletions was a pass to Xavier Legette, who to me at that point shouldn’t have been in the game. That pass went incomplete of course, because Legette — the Panthers’ first-round draft pick in 2024 — had what was undoubtedly the worst statistical lines in Carolina history. Young targeted Legette eight times. Eight! I have no idea why. Legette caught one. One! And it went for minus-2 yards, meaning Legette entered the game with 10 yards receiving this season and left it with eight. Now to be fair, Young (35-55-328 yards, with three TDs) had gotten Carolina back into the thing. Hunter Renfrow had a breakout game at slot receiver, scoring twice. McMillan didn’t score, but had his first 100-yard receiving game. Tight end Ja’Tavion Sanders and wide receiver Brycen Tremayne were also very good. And the comeback happened after Young about lost the game for the Panthers in the first quarter, fumbling the ball away on a strip-sack that led directly to a return touchdown and then throwing an ill-advised pass under pressure that resulted in a wounded-duck interception and three more points. Said Canales after the game about Young: “Sometimes it ain’t the worst thing, if you’re in that situation, to take a sack. I also know he makes some magical plays.” We saw both on Sunday. Young held the ball too long sometimes, including on Carolina’s final offensive play (a fourth-down sack). He also made some magic, sometimes throwing between three guys at once, sometimes escaping a sack attempt and keeping his eyes downfield for a touchdown. So there were some things that were better Sunday. Carolina only scored 10 points in Week 1; this time the Panthers had 22. The run defense improved. Young, after playing the first five quarters of the season as if he didn’t belong in the NFL, finally looked like he did again for those three consecutive TD marches. But that final drive?! Listen, Arizona was ripe to be beaten at that point. NFL onside kicks didn’t succeed about 94% of the time in 2024, yet this one did after a Cardinal misplayed it. Arizona had lost 19 points of its 24-point lead at that point. The Panthers, who had never successfully come back from more than 17 points down before, were close to a signature win for both Canales and Young. And then… total letdown. Again, let’s emphasize, the clock was very little factor. Carolina didn’t have 15 seconds left to score; the Panthers had 115 seconds left. And a timeout. And only 51 yards to navigate. Momentum was firmly on the Panthers’ side. These were the moments where Drew Brees killed the Panthers, time and again, when he played for New Orleans. Three-step drops. Eight yards here. Twelve yards there. Right down the field. But for the Panthers, every play looked the same — Young on a deep drop. Scanning, scanning. The pocket breaking down. Then, either a heave, or some scurrying around and then a heave. Or a sack. All the blitz-killing plays that the Panthers have at their disposal — they didn’t run any of them, it seemed like, except a Hubbard run that netted 3 yards. The Panthers’ best plays were Arizona penalties. Other than that, it all went south. Carolina couldn’t adjust to the Arizona adjustments. Needing a touchdown, the Panthers never got closer than the Arizona 33. And so that was that.   At least there was some hope. At least the game was exciting in the final two minutes. But, as has happened so often in the past eight seasons, when it was winning time for Carolina, it turned into losing time.
    • Ditching XL is addition by subtraction. I 100% believe Thielen would tell him where to line up  every snap and explain his route. Through 2 games he has shown 0 comprehension of the play book. I’m not absolving Young at all but XL is  supposed to be his second read, but dude runs the wrong routes and gets boxed out by guys who are 4” shorter.  At least Coker has shown aptitude to be a real NFL receiver. 
    • I'm trying to be as pragmatic and as un reactionary as possible. And once again multiple things can be true  His draft last year was disastrously terrible. X looks like an absolute bust. Brooks hasn't played. Wallace looks like a miss. But demani needs more pt, cws is solid and Coker has shown promise This draft cannot be judged after 2 games esp with a dc who doesn't want to play them. But tmac looks legit. Princely has promise. The rest is a ?  Has he made mistakes? Undoubtedly.  Is the roster better than it was 2 years ago? I'd say yes. I'd say our biggest problems are still the ones we had 2 years ago - Bryce and evero.  And as I've said before, at least he hasn't traded any future picks. Yet.  So IMHO Morgan is a mixed bag but not a total bust. Yet.
×
×
  • Create New...