Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much does our offense improve with the return of Otah?


The Question

Recommended Posts

Watching these games it's quite obvious that our offensive line play has fallen off drastically since last season. Yet the only piece changed was the switch from Vincent to Bernardeau, and while he has made some mistakes it pales in comparison to the total ineptitude this year. Could Otah's absence really be affecting our run and pass blocking that much? I'm not saying when he comes back everything will be glitzy but nothing else makes sense as to why the sudden lack of production on the ground and protecting our young quarterback. What does the huddle think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean it just doesn't make sense, we have had some of the best O-Line play in the league the last couple years, and that's with Jake back there who was notorious for holding the ball for a minute and he wasn't the least mobile and now we have a rookie qb scrambling for his life every play and still barely has time. Idk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best help for the O-line will be better quarterback play and the establishment of a passing game. That is why suddenly the O-line regressed. Otah is a help in the running game but actually a liability somewhat in pass protection. As long as we can't throw downfield to reduce blitzing and loading the box, Otah won't make as big a difference as people hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best help for the O-line will be better quarterback play and the establishment of a passing game. That is why suddenly the O-line regressed. Otah is a help in the running game but actually a liability somewhat in pass protection. As long as we can't throw downfield to reduce blitzing and loading the box, Otah won't make as big a difference as people hope.

ya people don't seem to realize that fact. if u can't take advantage of a blitz and show u can at least pass to wide open receivers the best oline in the business can't help u.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

better when he is back, but how long before he tweaks the knee?

I view Otah being in the game as a luxury at this point in the season. He is a massive dude, doesnt bode well to have so many leg injuries early in his career.

you guys think we could have taken Clady instead of stew, then still traded up for stew in otah's spot? imagine the possibilities... discuss amoung yourselves..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...