Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Terminology clarification


KSpan

Recommended Posts

When Armanti (or Moore, or Clausen, or Peyton Manning, or whoever), hands off to a WR coming around it is an end-around, not a reverse. A reverse requires 2 hands offs, meaning that the ball is reversing field. A running back, running one way, handing off to a WR, running the other way, is a reverse, not a double reverse. A double-reverse requires 3 hand-offs, thus reversing field twice, or "double".

Had to say it. Carry on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, that terminology is correct for a QB who stays centered and hands off to the "end-around" receiver, usually after faking a hand off to the running back. However in Armanti's case, he was bootlegging out in a QB sweep/option run pattern and then handed off to the person coming back across the field, thus reversing the direction of the play. So for all intents and purposes, it is a reverse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, that terminology is correct for a QB who stays centered and hands off to the "end-around" receiver, usually after faking a hand off to the running back. However in Armanti's case, he was bootlegging out in a QB sweep/option run pattern and then handed off to the person coming back across the field, thus reversing the direction of the play. So for all intents and purposes, it is a reverse.

Good call - I'll agree with that. Most of the time, however, the QB is stationary when handing off to the receiver. Not a reverse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It was at some point his rookie season…really, when Frank had to give him that “break” 3 games in and for Dalton to play vs Seattle.  While it was obvious he lacked the tools….i still contend that was peak between the ears of Bryce on top lacking the physical tools
    • Fair. But I do agree with him, likely AT catches at least one if not both of those balls. For a couple of reasons, probably get better separation, averaged 3 yds in 2024 and 2.9 yds in 2023 versus the 1.79 yds in the game today for Hunter. Additionally, AT is a physically far larger and has a significant catch radius advantage over Renfrow.  That's not to say that Bryce still didn't miss those throws but those bigger guys do help alleviate some of those mistakes just because of those type of advantages. You said yourself, we are having him basically attempt to be an AT clone when he just simply isn’t.
    • You can’t be serious rn. Yes the receivers let him down, did you even watch the game? Bryce played horrible, the WRs outside of TMac played horrible, the LBs player horrible, coaching was horrible. The difference between me and you is you want to pin everything on one player. EVERYTHING. IS. BAD. 
×
×
  • Create New...