Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN Sucks!


Catdaddy

Recommended Posts

To map the extent of concern for the Panther's victory is below:

1234124113848067438.jpg

A 0-5 team winning one is not news.

In fact, it's going to put us under the radar big time, because now we aren't the worst, but we have a long way to go to be considered even "good". ESPN does suck, but not for not covering our win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched it for a little over an hour last night. Came on for like 15 seconds right after the Seahawks coverage. I hate ESPN too but 1-5 against 0-5 isn't exactly ge of the week material.

I haven't seen them either, i figured they had a bye or something. I went to the game so by the time I left the stadium and supper I went to bed when i got home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw it on ESPN when I was getting ready this morning.

I normally watch HLN in the mornings and only watch ESPN during football season. Just havent been doing that this year since...well, you know. But, today is a good Monday and I wanted to see it.

They talked about it once, I saw it in their little list of stuff to cover, so I sat and watched. I mean, it wasn't full blown 20 minute coverage or anything, but hey, we were on there.

This is normal though. Winning or losing, we normally don't get very much attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...