Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you could only have one kind for the rest of your life

LifeisaGarden

By LifeisaGarden,
in Huddle Lounge

What kind of meat would you choose?  

29 members have voted

  1. 1. What kind of meat would you choose?


Recommended Posts

LifeisaGarden Newbie

LifeisaGarden

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I think realistically I would probably choose chicken because chicken is so versatile and it already makes up at least 80% of my diet. Plus with chicken you get eggs too.

But the glutton in me would probably choose pork. With pork you get bacon, sausage, NC bbq, pork chops, pork steaks, ham hocks, fat back, pork rinds, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TarPanther9180 Newbie

TarPanther9180

Posted
Posted

I think realistically I would probably choose chicken because chicken is so versatile and it already makes up at least 80% of my diet. Plus with chicken you get eggs too.

But the glutton in me would probably choose pork. With pork you get bacon, sausage, NC bbq, pork chops, pork steaks, ham hocks, fat back, pork rinds, etc...

Exactly what I was thinking, but I didn't feel like typing it all out lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
j2sgam Collaborator

j2sgam

Posted
Posted

Pork, hands down... Pork chops, ribs, bacon-wrapped bacon, Italian sausage, ham sammiches, smoked butt, garlic, cheese & spinach stuffed Pork Loin, Cold tenderloin sammiches...Marinated, stuffed & grilled thick-cut chops, the be-all end-all...What other meat is so versatile?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CharlotteBeer.com Newbie

CharlotteBeer.com

Posted
Posted

I think realistically I would probably choose chicken because chicken is so versatile and it already makes up at least 80% of my diet. Plus with chicken you get eggs too.

I'd pick chicken for the same reasons, even though I much prefer a good steak to chicken. Like you said, chicken is more versatile -- you can prepare it just about any way you want, and it would probably work in more dishes than the other meats on the list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...