Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who's the best ... 1-win team? Panthers? Dallas?


Laetitia

Recommended Posts

At least we have won a game at home.

CAROLINA at ST. LOUIS: A two-game Panthers' winning streak? It's tempting... tempting... but: Rams 27, Panthers 13.

Read more: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/10/29/1794602/whos-the-best-1-win-team-panthers.html#ixzz13irGCDDk

Booo! Props to anyone in Charlotte that burns tomorrow's Charlotte Observer!

............and posts a pic as proof!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be honest: I hate the Cowboys, but I think they're the better team right now. They've shown far more promise on offense than we have, and they've been far more competitive against tougher teams than we've faced.

Does that mean they'll win more games? Of course not. But I think, right now, they're the better team.

I hope what we saw against the 49ers wasn't a fluke. If Moore and the receivers can play like that consistently, I'd probably say we're the better team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be honest: I hate the Cowboys, but I think they're the better team right now. They've shown far more promise on offense than we have, and they've been far more competitive against tougher teams than we've faced. Does that mean they'll win more games? Of course not. But I think, right now, they're the better team.

I hope what we saw against the 49ers wasn't a fluke. If Moore and the receivers can play like that consistently, I'd probably say we're the better team.

yeah, but now Romo is gone. That takes Austin, Bryant, Witten all down a few notches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • take a  look around the league at other young Qb's around Bryce Young's age group  such as Drake Maye , Jayden Daniels, Bo Nix , CJ Stroud  & Caleb Williams who at the time like Bryce Young they also were drafted also joined teams with a losing record .the only difference with these Qb's is after joining their teams with a losing record they led those same teams to a winning record in a very short period of time .it's simply what you call a game changer & or elite Qb's & then take a  look at  the other side of the coin you have Qb's such as Trey Lance, Zach Wilson, Mac Jones, Justin Fields  & Anthony Richardson also like Bryce Young all first round picks who instead of winning either did not play or led their teams to a losing record while playing  just because Bryce Young was a #1 overall pick does not necessarily mean that he will become improve with time if history tells you anything it's matter of fact just the opposite . lBryce Young who has an overall record of 14-30 & wildly inconsistent & never in the history pf the NFL has a Qb 5'10" or shorter had a successful carrer as Qb in the NFL  you have to ignore alot of FACTS & be really ignorant to the FACT to think Bryce Young is the future at Qb if anything history is telling you exactly what ?..just saying
    • The only answer 
    • to me these two signings were so bad for the Panthers at the time of our young team. "Sean Gilbert was signed by the Carolina Panthers on April 21, 1998, after being traded from the Washington Redskins in a deal that sent the Panthers two first-round picks (Nos. 5 and 12) to Washington. The Panthers then re-signed Gilbert to a 7-year, $46.5 million contract extension on the same date"  The other was Jason Peters being picked in the First round of the 1998 draft. "Peter played for the Panthers from 1998 to 2001, appearing in 38 games (starting 20) and recording 88 total tackles, 7.5 sacks, and 1 fumble recovery His NFL career was cut short by a chronic neck stinger, forcing him to retire after the 2001 season   
×
×
  • Create New...