Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ward 1, Hunter, maybe 2. Per McShay


Recommended Posts

Just now, 45catfan said:

There will be an early run on OTs, IMO.  Sanders falls.  How far?  How about I'm recent seeing mocks having the Steelers drafting Dart at #21 WITH Sanders still on the board.  I'm telling you, I saw just some snippets of Sanders Pro Day and it looked like he was throwing a medicine ball instead of a football.  Very little zip and the ball looked oversized/cumbersome to throw.

I could definitely see several OTs going high. 

Yeah, I just never got the hype with Sanders as an NFL prospect. Good college QB there just wasn't anything about his traits and not much about his game that I saw translating to the NFL. He just looks like the classic "good college player who doesn't translate to the NFL" IMO.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that's not factoring in the "daddy factor" complication. You know Deion is gonna be sticking his nose in if things aren't going according to his plan. So you have to both fall in love with the (IMO) marginal prospect and deal with the helicopter dad with a huge microphone. Yeah, that'd be a hard pass from me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jax is going Tet or oline... they have invested a ton of time on Tet and want to pair him with Thomas Jr. Somebody is gonna drop and I'm thinking it's Carter more n more. 3 is going to be Sanders... rather it's the giants or somebody going up to 3  or 4 to get him.  Jeanty is a raider. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

This Carson Schwesinger's season stats:  CRUSHES Jalon Walker's production that happens to be a second round prospect high second, but day 2 none-the-less.

image.png.899690c46998facb52c1b772754b16bb.png

image.png.264d25010619e803496f6fc98d46ea68.png

The difference is that everyone knows that Schwesinger projects as an off ball LB where as most think Walker can be an EDGE. He did both at UGA.

Hell, I wouldn't be opposed to to drafting Walker at 8 and Schwesinger at 57 if he's there.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The difference is that everyone knows that Schwesinger projects as an off ball LB where as most think Walker can be an EDGE. He did both at UGA.

Hell, I wouldn't be opposed to to drafting Walker at 8 and Schwesinger at 57 if he's there.

That's part of my problem, Walker is a 'tweener and we fug those guys up--royally.  See Jeremy Chinn. Not only that, able to play two positions is very different than dominating at one.  This isn't the OL where the ability to play multiple positions is seen as a plus, or even a requirement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

That's part of my problem, Walker is a 'tweener and we fug those guys up--royally.  See Jeremy Chinn. Not only that, able to play two positions is very different than dominating at one.  This isn't the OL where the ability to play multiple positions is seen as a plus, or even a requirement.

Never understood the Chinn comparison,why not compare him to Luvu which makes more sense?  Oh i know because we used Luvu well so that doesn't support your argument

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The difference is that everyone knows that Schwesinger projects as an off ball LB where as most think Walker can be an EDGE. He did both at UGA.

Hell, I wouldn't be opposed to to drafting Walker at 8 and Schwesinger at 57 if he's there.

We will use him like Luvu, watch Dunc compare the 2

https://youtu.be/nt_aDTMX7DM?si=0Y7DYQ7sFKy2u10T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Never understood the Chinn comparison,why not compare him to Luvu which makes more sense?  Oh i know because we used Luvu well so that doesn't support your argument

Luvu was a FA that was coming into his prime.  Yes, he hit his stride here, but we didn't draft and mold him during his first contract.  So your comparison isn't exactly apple-to-apples either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Luvu was a FA that was coming into his prime.  Yes, he hit his stride here, but we didn't draft and mold him during his first contract.  So your comparison isn't exactly apple-to-apples either.

So you think comparing a safety to a LB makes sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

My clued in Giants fan Buddy says #3 is Carter's floor. If he's there they're taking him.

I believe this. Giants owner kept the coach and GM for a reason and it wasn't to reach on shedeur

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SOJA said:

I believe this. Giants owner kept the coach and GM for a reason and it wasn't to reach on shedeur

That being said, rookie QB does buy time normally.

Veteran QB usually means unemployment if things don't work out.

I should also mention I think the Giants will nuke the entire coaching staff and FO next offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...