Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pissed That We Drafted Luck

pantherfan81

By pantherfan81,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jbro Newbie

Jbro

Posted
Posted

I for one would be pissed if we did not get him. I know "experts" are wrong a lot of times but from everything I have read on him he sounds like a home run. In the last 10 years 8 QBs have been picked #1 overall and none of them have had a report card as good as luck. With that said he will end up being Ryan Leaf part deus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherfan81 Newbie

pantherfan81

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I for one would be pissed if we did not get him. I know "experts" are wrong a lot of times but from everything I have read on him he sounds like a home run. In the last 10 years 8 QBs have been picked #1 overall and none of them have had a report card as good as luck. With that said he will end up being Ryan Leaf part deus.

Same here. Though I believe there is no chance in hell he ends up being a Ryan Leaf. He's too smart for that. Leaf was a party animal with no work ethic. Luck is not even close to being that kind of player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R0CKnR0LLA Experienced

R0CKnR0LLA

Posted
Posted

I wouldn't be mad if we took Luck. For awhile I've been on the fence whether I wanted us to take Luck or trade down for picks and keep Clausen and I'm leaning more and more toward Luck. However, I find it funny that people act like this is the only imaginable route to go and anything else is insane.

It's completely possible that Luck ends up a bust.

It's completely possible that Clausen develops into a very good QB.

I'd say not only possible but extremely likely that we could net a huge amount of picks trading down (two early 1st rounders, a 2nd and 3rd would not be out of the question).

One one hand, Luck is our elite franchise QB for the next 10+ years giving us more than enough time to build a yearly contender around him. We trade Clausen and he does nothing (or is merely mediocre) on his new team.

On the other hand, Luck is a bust and Clausen develops into a very good QB for another team. We pass on a huge amount of picks to take Luck and trade Clausen away only to regret both decisions.

There's two ways we can go. One will end up being the right one and there's no way to tell right now with 100% certainty which one it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R0CKnR0LLA Experienced

R0CKnR0LLA

Posted
Posted

For anyone that really thinks Luck is guaranteed to be the next Peyton Manning, the guy is still really young and has limited experience (and hence a limited amount of game tape to grade him). There have been much bigger "can't miss, absolute lock first ballot HOF" prospects that have ended up doing jack sh*t.

Just take a look at this asshole...

nfl_g_mandarich_SI_200.jpg

How did he end up? Oh yeah, he did nothing other than become a massive disappointment and now runs a photography studio.

Like I said, I wouldn't be against taking Luck from everything I know about him but let's be realistic here, there's never a lock in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthercougar68 Grand Master

Panthercougar68

Posted
Posted

Which is clear with hindsight years after he's drafted.

True but he wore out his welcome in GB fast, didn't he call the place the village of Green Bay or something? After that he didn't have a terrible career in Indy.

Id be happy with Luck, when you see him play it looks exactly like the same style of play you saw with Sam Bradford. Sometimes the analyst are right with talent and projections and sometimes they're wrong but honestly I feel that Luck will live up to the hype.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Seamonk Explorer

Seamonk

Posted
Posted

We need offense. Someone who can make reads quickly and throw a dart. Whether they actually become that is up to the coaching staff. You know whatever coaching staff comes in are going to try to make them succeed. I don't think a lot of people are afraid of Jimmy Clausen throwing all over them right now. They stack the run and take their chances with guys downfield and since Jimmy has no balls and doesn't take advantage of single coverage matchups he won't scare anyone. With Andrew Luck there's that anxiety factor. Remember when we played Matt Ryan for the first time.. Everyone was hating on him, saying there's no way.. but people still had that small gut feeling that he could just light it up. He didn't do it then, but did do it later that season.

Plus he sells the play action really well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Matthias Proficient

Matthias

Posted
Posted

No one would be mad if we took Luck, but if we could get a Herschel Walker/Ricky Williams deal for him, I think the front office would be crazy not to take that deal. I said it before, I would rather have the best team in NFL history over having the best QB in NFL history. And with this kind of deal, we can get a QB and alot more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By TD alt · Posted

      Yep, like I said, I don't mind guaranteeing them money, but make the contracts smaller amounts in order to minimize cap implications. I don't know about "half," the actual amounts, whether more or less than half, would have to be determined by the NFL and NFLPA (which will probably be highly contentious, if not "impossible").  I'm just for whatever leads to the best product on the field while also unaffecting my wallet. As an aside, the NFL owners are greedy bastards in my estimation. They're trying to keep a larger portion of the pie, but players' agents are greedy as well, and they've sewn seeds of greed among the players. It's not all their fault; we all know what our society has evolved into, but the NFL wants a bigger piece of our smaller pocketbooks and refuses to "negotiate" with us (that's why we don't have cheaper and more reasonable à la carte options to view games that they're gradually trying to migrate to paid TV), so fu<k 'em. And then on top of that we have guys trying to water down the product even more by feeding greed. Change the way things are done so that we can at least see players prove themselves on the field without throwing wrenches into the engine that pays guys that have proven they can play on a pro level.
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      So if one of the parents wants to buy the theatre group or the band lunch they should get banned?
    • TD alt
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By TD alt · Posted

      OK, I didn't realize this was about high school, but...if I'm spending my personal money trying to help some kids out, then no one is going to tell me how to spend my money. I get enough of the government spending my money--allocating my tax dollars--to children who don't really need anything, and now they're trying to tell me how to spend my personal money? Sure, there are many other issues to consider and rabbit holes that we could go down due to ethical concerns because it concerns kids, and the need for transparency is extremely important, but maybe as opposed to trying to stop kids from benefitting in darkness, we need to open up the blinds (and blinders) a little bit so that they can benefit in the light. I get where you're coming from, but this is a loaded and layered issue, and I'm just trying to give you some food for thought. 
×
×
  • Create New...