Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dane Bruglers The Beast


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I'm always a little leery of guys that have college careers like this.  5th year seniors are at an advantage in college, and are most times closer to their ceiling than a guy coming out after 3 years.

33630061_Screenshot2025-04-10at2_12_09PM.png.bf314bbd59aeee85fc9ca2d2c1c985e9.png

Horrible argument in comparison to the potential Edge Rusher picks who have exactly 0 high level successful years statistically. Looking at you Walker, Williams, and Shemar. That said all on the table I probably go Walker over Warren, but the paper don’t look so good.. 🤷‍♂️ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Swaggasaurus said:

Horrible argument in comparison to the potential Edge Rusher picks who have exactly 0 high level successful years statistically. Looking at you Walker, Williams, and Shemar. That said all on the table I probably go Walker over Warren, but the paper don’t look so good.. 🤷‍♂️ 

based on his production in his very very limited snaps, coupled with his leadership and intangibles, walkers floor is sky high

 

https://www.derp/2025/4/10/24402615/is-he-really-the-dawg-the-panthers-are-looking-for

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Swaggasaurus said:

Horrible argument in comparison to the potential Edge Rusher picks who have exactly 0 high level successful years statistically. Looking at you Walker, Williams, and Shemar. That said all on the table I probably go Walker over Warren, but the paper don’t look so good.. 🤷‍♂️ 

You certainty didnt mean to include Walker?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

And he was productive at 19 and 20 years old at the highest level of college.

I want walker bad but my gut says he isnt going to be an option at 8.   I think teams are playing possum on this dude.   If the only flaw you can find is that he is one inch too short then yeah man he is a legit prospect

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, csx said:

You certainty didnt mean to include Walker?

Of course I did. I’m talking about stats only. 60 total tackles and 6.5 sacks is nowhere near top 10 pick stats. I said I probably pick him and it’s for what’s on tape, between the ears and what he can be. But I’m quoting the one year wonder stat for Warren. And comparing it to zero year wonder from other prospects.

Edited by Swaggasaurus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Swaggasaurus said:

Of course I did. I’m talking about stats only. 60 total tackles and 6.5 sacks is nowhere near top 10 pick stats. I said I probably pick him and it’s for what’s on tape, between the ears and what he can be. But I’m quoting the one year wonder stat for Warren. And comparing it to zero year wonder from other prospects.

With a team like Georgia you just can't look at stats because they rotate a lot.  Walker has the most sacks and TFL on the best defense in college football.  That's says enough for me

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was playing around with the ESPN playoff predictor and it shows if 49ers and Rams finish with same record, the Rams hold the tiebreaker.     
    • This is my thinking as well. Seattle played as good as they could on defense and Panthers still had a chance until those back to back turnovers.  I don't think the Rams played particularly well in their game against us, alot things went our way in order to win.  Someone pointed out the Rams were bad on the east coast road games and Seattle has been the better road team but they just fought a hard contested game against the Panthers, and now they travel to San Fran this week for their biggest game of the season to determine the division and if they are the overall #1 seed in the NFC or will be traveling for the Wildcard weekend.  If they lose they then travel back cross the country to play a team they've just beaten two weeks ago, not saying they won't be favored against the Panthers but the energy of hosting our first playoff game in 10 years along with the get back effect of having just lost to this team could be huge. 
    • I don’t know about shadowing and all that, but according to this, whatever we are doing is working 
×
×
  • Create New...