Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we get Luck, Bring Jake back..


Fade2BlackAndBlue

Recommended Posts

Absolutely. We'll be able to sign him for cheap. I'm sure he'd like nothing more than to come back to Carolina. A lot of the guys in the locker room would love to have him back. There'd be absolutely no question in anyone's mind about whether or not he should start (obviously not). He's a high character guy who I'm sure would thrive in the role of a veteran mentor. He could handle stepping in as a back-up if we needed him to, and he should retire a Panther. Bring the Ragin' Cajun back home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're going to bring a veteran in regardless. We can bring in some high-priced jackass like Hasselbeck or McNabb or Palmer, or we can bring Jake back. We'll have Jimmy and Luck so he won't have to play, but having him in the locker room for cheap is definitely a win-win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

on paper i like jake for that type of role - lots of experience in this system, great veteran leader, popular with teammakes - but on a practical level i just don't see it happening. we are at a crossroads in our history right now.

for as long as we can seem to remember we've had john fox as our head coach and jake delhomme as our quarterback. times have changed, and in two games fox will be gone. the veteran purge means we will have a new young team who can be molded into the type of team a new coach wants, through the draft, free agency, and gelling during camps/games.

sadly jake has no place in this. there's no room for him. the franchise has moved on, and signing jake would be a look backwards. we can't look back any more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the thing that i am wondering guys...is..is a quarterback going to be the answer to the problems in carolina? Last year we thought that all problems would be solved through Jimmy Clausen, or alot of people did, and im not saying Jimmy Clausen is a lost cause. I think our problem can be solved by a defensive linemen or an offensive linemen. A normal qb has at least 3 seconds to get off a good pass...and when there is 3 defensive men in the back field in about 2 seconds...i dont really think that is the qbs fault....i dont believe luck is the answer to our problems

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know, I know all 3 aspects of our team will be addressed in the off season. I like the way Schwartz has come on, but we need to address the RT spot, and a backup C. I also think that a quality DT will be added via FA, and possibly through the draft as well. I think CB will be addressed via FA or the draft depending on staff selection. All of this is just what-if until we know what who/and what the staff will do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...