Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN does not want Luck in Carolina


MHS831

Recommended Posts

I am getting a little sick of ESPN covering every possible scenario involving the #1 pick except Luck going to Carolina.

First, last night, the announcers kept making comments that he should return to school. Did not mention the Cats once.

Then today, Mortenson suggested that Carolina will stick with second round pick Clausen and trade the pick-- it will create a bidding war like no other.

Then they discussed that Denver will pull a Manning/Elway to get him by hiring Harbaugh.

Are they suggesting a Lebraun-type conspiracy? A plan to extort a player by creating a behind-the-scenes network designed to beat the system? The fact that they thought this and said it out loud on National TV is cheap and shows what slimeballs and scum ESPN hires. Why not cover the most probable scenario, which is Luck going to Carolina because the Panthers have a need at QB? Shallow sleeze balls. Just want to plant seeds and corrupt the sport that they feed on. If ESPN was ethical at all, they would fire these scuzzy bastards. Pricks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's because we most likely won't have the personnel to challenge Luck to be the greatest. Harbaugh is one of those guys that can do so, yet all sources keep saying Carolina isn't interested in Harbaugh. Plus, we are a small market team. What is there to get excited about in Carolina? (This is their thinking.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually ESPN does want andrew luck in Carolina because it would create an outlet through which it could reach an up until that point apathetic fan base.

NFL interest in down in the Carolinas and ESPN loses ad revenue through television and radio advertising.

Bringing in Luck would increase it.

there is no reason for them to want luck to land in an already large, established market.

for more information about the absolute basics of capital check out marx.org/kids

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's because we most likely won't have the personnel to challenge Luck to be the greatest. Harbaugh is one of those guys that can do so, yet all sources keep saying Carolina isn't interested in Harbaugh. Plus, we are a small market team. What is there to get excited about in Carolina? (This is their thinking.)

C'mon man........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...