Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some owners would rather lose season than keep current system


ncguy2184

Recommended Posts

“I don’t think any of the major areas are getting closer,” King said. “The biggest area right now is that I believe there are owners out there — prominent owners — that if the system isn’t fixed to where it was a lot closer to pre-’06 levels than it is now . . . I think there are some owners would rather just lose the season.”

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/17/king-some-owners-would-rather-lose-season-than-keep-current-system/

Maybe Jerry Richardson?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is, it is the owner's money, so I am not surprised they aren't keen on the players taking 60% of the revenue.

Frankly I don't see how that is a viable business model at all, so if the owner's do not get this right now, then I don't blame them.

Problem is the players are used to getting what they want the last few years with frankly ridiculous sized contracts, which is mainly the owner's fault. It's a bit like spoiling your kid all it's life, then suddenly changing to get them to fend for themselves.

If they actually looked at it objectively, the 16% drop isn't much (take 16% from their wages and it's not a big difference at the wages they get). Most will be made up due to the rookie scale and there would likely be more for veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you factor in the salaries for coaches, concessions operators, training staff, marketing, etc, I am sure that the % of revenue being paid out to "employees" is at 70% or greater. I challenge anyone to find another industry that pays that much out to employees. You won't because it simply isn't a sustainable business model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you factor in the salaries for coaches, concessions operators, training staff, marketing, etc, I am sure that the % of revenue being paid out to "employees" is at 70% or greater. I challenge anyone to find another industry that pays that much out to employees. You won't because it simply isn't a sustainable business model.

Bingo

Try telling the fat kid at the party he has to share the cake with the others children. The players will not accept less because they are used to getting more than everyone else, including the owner's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Anybody got a clue what this is supposed to mean? 🤔
    • I figured as much. Hopefully he's just resting up and will be ready for round 3 (if we make it that far.)  Sucks to see. Hes been our best defender (besides Slavin) in the playoffs so far.
    • I've never bought into the idea. There's just too much at stake, even for front office people. Jobs are lost, trust is lessened, lives are altered, reputations are damaged and more. Throw in that the average front office person isn't as young as the average player. They may not have ten years ahead of them to salvage their careers. Any given year could be their last. The only person not guaranteed to suffer some direct form of consequence from losing is the owner, and even there you still have problems (fan reaction, team reputation, revenue, etc). You've also got massive egos in play on that front so it can get personal. Mind you, I do accept that there are "fire sales" in order to build for the future, but even those have consequences. They don't exactly guarantee success either. Poorly run teams often just wind up in the same circumstance a few years down the road. Sorry gus, but my tinfoil hat just hasn't fit me for quite a while.
×
×
  • Create New...