Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread


Recommended Posts

Just now, Waldo said:

Just meh for me. More so when I look at what they have already done this offseason. Take a freaking OT over him or Graham. Neither are bad but neither really get past meh for me.

My friend the entire draft is meh. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

A lot of the speculation about our potential trade down opportunities has swirled around Sanders and Jeanty but could it actually be Jaxson Dart that gives us that opportunity?

https://x.com/NFLonCBS/status/1915404791410249807?t=Vwm1R_wJLQ7QtZ6HYKBD0w&s=19

 

Heard that teams could be targeting Dart and not Sanders as the 2nd QB. And maybe Milroe as an early 2nd or late 1st that someone trades into.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

 

🤔 

Great call. I still wonder if the Saints bite in the first or get a trade up into the late first.

Sanders not being a top 3 QB would be hilarious after everything. At first I thought Dart was the smokescreen but it may be Sanders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Great call. I still wonder if the Saints bite in the first or get a trade up into the late first.

Sanders not being a top 3 QB would be hilarious after everything. At first I thought Dart was the smokescreen but it may be Sanders.

When I watch Sanders play I just don't see it. Not as an NFL prospect. He just looks like the typical "good college player that doesn't translate" to me. I don't see any physical trait that's above NFL average without the mental acuity that Bryce showed against far better competition. I think he was largely carried by Travis Hunter.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Great call. I still wonder if the Saints bite in the first or get a trade up into the late first.

Sanders not being a top 3 QB would be hilarious after everything. At first I thought Dart was the smokescreen but it may be Sanders.

 
looks like he's been told 
 
 
FYELcXcZ_bigger.jpg
 
I’m built for whatever today may bring
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

When I watch Sanders play I just don't see it. Not as an NFL prospect. He just looks like the typical "good college player that doesn't translate" to me. I don't see any physical trait that's above NFL average without the mental acuity that Bryce showed against far better competition. I think he was largely carried by Travis Hunter.

I agree. He tries to force basic stuff and Hunter did a lot to make him look better. He just looks like a guy who maxed out in school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

When I watch Sanders play I just don't see it. Not as an NFL prospect. He just looks like the typical "good college player that doesn't translate" to me. I don't see any physical trait that's above NFL average without the mental acuity that Bryce showed against far better competition. I think he was largely carried by Travis Hunter.

I'm still not taking Jaxson Dart before him unless it's like the 3rd round.  Seems crazy to me.  There's an outside chance Sanders is good in the NFL.  I think Dart is a backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:
 
looks like he's been told 
 
 
FYELcXcZ_bigger.jpg
 
I’m built for whatever today may bring

From anyone else that would be obvious reference but from that family it's just standard stuff really. He could just be referring to finally acknowledging Ward is going as the first QB. Who knows with a Sanders

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I'm still not taking Jaxson Dart before him unless it's like the 3rd round.  Seems crazy to me.  There's an outside chance Sanders is good in the NFL.  I think Dart is a backup.

That's how I see Sanders and the one with any upside is Dart.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I'm still not taking Jaxson Dart before him unless it's like the 3rd round.  Seems crazy to me.  There's an outside chance Sanders is good in the NFL.  I think Dart is a backup.

For the record, I don't think either work out long term as starters. But I think Dart has the considerably higher ceiling. I just don't see anything about Sanders' playing style that is going to work in the NFL with his physical tools.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Don't buy that game being rigged either. They didn't need to. We played (and coached) like dog sh-t 😖
    • Partially. Part of it is Canales. I think if there was a McCaffrey, Smith, Olsen, Williams, etc it would change the offense. Bryce is a game manager, not game changer that’s established, but who can make a big play? Nobody. I have yet to see a wideout except maybe once break a tackle and take it to the house. Outside of Miami, I can’t think of a long run that flipped the field.
    • The "Fix" is in the Personnel: Referee Tendencies as Management Tools If the NFL is "managed," the primary lever for that management is crew assignment. A "rigged" game doesn't require a backroom bribe; it simply requires assigning a referee crew whose known statistical biases align with the league's desired outcome. By analyzing data from the 2023-2025 seasons, we can categorize specific officials into "profiles" that sophisticated bettors—and likely the league itself—use to predict game flow. I. The "Over" Architects (For High-Scoring Spectacles) When the league needs a primetime game (like Monday Night Football) to be an exciting shootout, they can assign crews that historically "swallow the whistle," allowing offenses to operate without rhythm-killing flags. • Bill Vinovich: The "Let Them Play" King. • The Stat: In the 2024 season, Vinovich's crew averaged the lowest number of flags per game (12.76) and the fewest offensive holding calls (1.59 per game). • The "Management" Angle: Fewer holding calls mean quarterbacks have more time to throw and drives aren't stalled by 10-yard penalties. Assigning Vinovich to a game involving a superstar QB (like Patrick Mahomes or Joe Burrow) virtually guarantees a cleaner, higher-scoring game. It is no coincidence Vinovich is frequently assigned to Super Bowls, where the league wants a fluid, exciting product rather than a penalty-fest. • Alex Moore & Scott Novak: The "Over" Darlings. • The Stat: In recent data, Alex Moore’s crew hit the "Over" (total points) in nearly 77% of their games. Scott Novak followed closely at nearly 70%. • The Betting Edge: These crews tend to call defensive pass interference (DPI) more strictly than offensive holding, which directly gifts yardage to offenses and extends drives. II. The "Under" Enforcers (For Keeping Games Close) Conversely, if the league needs to slow down a runaway offense or keep a game close to the spread, they can assign "flag-happy" crews that disrupt game flow. • Shawn Hochuli: The Drive Killer. • The Stat: Hochuli’s crew is consistently among the league leaders in total penalties and specifically offensive holding. In 2024, his crew averaged over 3.2 holding calls per game. • The "Management" Angle: Offensive holding is the most effective tool to kill a drive. A 1st-and-20 is statistically much harder to convert than a 1st-and-10. If a team like the Chiefs or Bills is favored by 10 points, assigning Hochuli increases the variance, allowing the underdog to hang around as the favorite's drives stall out due to flags. • Adrian Hill: The "Under" Specialist. • The Stat: Hill’s crew has a career trend of hitting the "Under" in roughly 55-60% of games, with an even higher percentage in divisional matchups. • The Betting Edge: His crew calls a tighter game on procedural penalties (false starts, illegal formation), which stops the clock less often than major fouls but keeps offenses "behind the sticks," leading to more punts. III. The "Home Cookers" (Protecting the Home Team) Certain referees show a statistical deviation that heavily favors the home team, often attributed to being influenced by crowd noise—or perhaps a tendency to support the "house" advantage. • Brad Allen: The Home Field Guardian. • The Stat: Since 2016, home teams have won straight up in roughly 58-60% of games officiated by Allen, covering the spread at a rate significantly higher than the league average. • The "Management" Angle: In a playoff game where the home team is a major market favorite, Allen is a "safe" assignment. His tendency to let the home crowd influence 50/50 calls (like pass interference) reinforces the home field advantage. • Carl Cheffers: The "Chiefs" Anomaly. • The Stat: Cheffers has been a statistical outlier regarding the Kansas City Chiefs. Analysis has shown his crews call significantly more penalties against the Chiefs than the league average. • The "Management" Angle: This seemingly contradicts the "rigged for the Chiefs" narrative, but it serves a different purpose: Handicapping. If the Chiefs are too dominant, assigning Cheffers creates artificial adversity, ensuring the game remains close (and within the betting spread) rather than a blowout. IV. The "Wild Card": Clete Blakeman • The Profile: Chaos. • The Stat: Blakeman’s crew led the league in 2024 with over 300 total flags. • The "Management" Angle: When Blakeman is assigned, the outcome becomes high-variance. The sheer volume of penalties means the referees have an outsized impact on the result. This is ideal for "trap games" where the league might want to introduce chaos into a matchup that looks like a guaranteed blowout on paper. Conclusion: It's Not a Script, It's an Algorithm Sophisticated bettors do not bet on teams; they bet on combinations of teams and referees. • The Formula: Elite Passing Offense + Bill Vinovich = Bet the Over. • The Formula: Sloppy O-Line + Shawn Hochuli = Bet the Under. If you were the NFL, and you wanted to ensure a "fair" but "entertaining" product, you wouldn't tell a referee to fix a game. You would simply assign the referee whose natural tendencies make the desired outcome (a close game, a high-scoring game, or a home win) statistically probable.
×
×
  • Create New...