Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Williams, Johnson or someone else?

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

mountainpantherfan Newbie

mountainpantherfan

Posted
Posted

Johnson and Anderson aren't close to being worth the value of the tag so the two of them are automaticly off the list.

Kalil is the most important player to be signed but he isn't worth LT money.

Williams can probably get close to what the tag is on the open market but investing that much into a player that's only played 18 games in the last two seasons is very risky.

So, if the Panthers are confident they can sign Kalil, then use the tag on Williams and hope to trade him. $8 mill for one year of Williams' service isn't that outragous.

However, if you're not confident about getting a deal done with Kalil, you tag him first and let Williams walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swarly Newbie

Swarly

Posted
Posted

Only guys in my opinion that would get a franchise tag are Kalil, Johnson, and Williams. Here are the 2010 franchise tag values:

OL - $10.7 million

DE - $12.4 million

RB - $8.2 million

The rest of the values are listed here: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/thehuddle/post/2010/02/nfl-franchise-player-tender-amounts-for-2010-season/1

Keep in mind these numbers are from 2010 so they'll be slightly higher, but that's the only thing I could find without going and looking up the contracts for the top 5 of each position lol.

I personally think it'll be Williams. I think we all know that Kalil will be getting a long term contract(and will possibly become the highest paid center in the NFL) as soon as a CBA is reached. It COULD be Johnson, because I don't think they'll give him a long term contract after one good season. Wish we knew more about the transition tags and if they'll be available for use after a CBA is reached..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ruff Newbie

Ruff

Posted
Posted

I would definitely put the tag on Kalil, if it came down to it. I think he is going to be the anchor of our offensive line for years to come, and I think the center should be valued just as highly as the LT. Look what Jeff Saturday has done for Peyton Manning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted

It actually should be understood primarily as a negotiating tool.

As often as not, the player that gets tagged doesn't wind up signing the one year deal. It just serves to keep him off the open market long enough for the team to work out the kind of deal that both can agree on.

They had a decision to make like this two years ago but got a deal done with Gross right before the deadline leaving them free to tag Peppers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayflip Proficient

jayflip

Posted
Posted

Let's keep this Norvert L Turner (being in San Diego, I've always just assumed his real name is Norvert, and middle is Lee) train running and think, if he thought it wise to let LT go, but franchise the undersized and overrated Sproles, then we'll no doubt franchise Dwill...i'm well aware of the contradictions in my prediction, but I just love me some Dwill. Injury prone? Maybe. Top talent in the league? Yes. We can't let him walk for a 3rd round comp pick. That's just silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mick eye Newbie

mick eye

Posted
Posted

I think if CJ gives us a hard-line tough negotiation we will tag him. CJ played lights out this year with not too much help from the offense or the interior dline. If Kalil decides to play hardballl we will tag him. So whoever wants to be a richard will be tagged and paid. Pep thought us all that. Dwill is as good as GONE. Deal wit it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By frankw · Posted

      The defense is 28 out of 32 in salary cap allocation for 2025. We have a ton of resources tied up in the offense including the highest paid OL in the league multiple 1st round WR's and multiple recent draft picks across the offense at TE and RB and we have two 1000 yard backs. Bryce and company couldn't get past Tyler Shough and his crew in 2 games. That's all there is to it. You can spin it and put the entire onus on the defense to your heart's desire it doesn't change the fact that this is an OFFENSIVE team now. If you want to argue that we should revert back to a defensive identity as we have been in the past which has brought us success then I will agree with you on that. But as it stands the onus is on the offense because that is where we have invested through the nose. Dave Canales and Bryce Young need to do a hell of a lot better than they have against the rebuilding Saints who without us should only have 2 wins this season.
    • TLGPanthersFan
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By TLGPanthersFan · Posted

      Bryce is not trending up. He is the same QB he has always been. Bottom of the league in most categories.  If Canales thinks he can build a contender with Bryce then he is a bigger idiot then I thought.  Offense next year will have the same issues and be just as inconsistent as it was this year.  We have seen Bryce’a ceiling and it is 175 yards a game and that is not a QB you keep around as your starter. That is barely a backup.   
    • frankw
      TNF: Rams/Seahawks

      By frankw · Posted

      Looks like Darnold should have had at least 3 picks. That'll get ugly in the playoffs eventually. Can't deny his physical talent though. You either have that or you don't. Mike Macdonald is a legit coach.
×
×
  • Create New...