Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Popcorn Ready? Gabriel to wear #2 in Cleveland?


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I really think they were ordered to draft him.  They can say what they want, but there was no joy in Mudville when he was picked. 

Before this, the Browns were having a good draft.  SS had to know the reason he dropped--his poor interviews, feeling of entitlement, etc.  and when Gabriel trolls him, he acts as if the number was his--at least, that is the implication.  It was an aggressive move by Gabriel, but Sanders, under these circumstances, should not have taken the bait. 

 

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sure looked that way. That draft room looked like a funeral when the pick was announced and they'd already taken a QB two rounds earlier. Did not seem like a decision made by the folks in that room. Said it during the draft.

They were probably so upset because they knew the can of worms it was about to open on them when ownership dictated that pick.

Because there is absolutely a scenario where he goes in there and looks like he might deserve the job.  Flacco has looked decent as a backup the last few years, but one of these seasons he's going to show up to camp and father time will have ended his career.  Pickett sucks and it's not like Gabriel is a can't miss draft pick either.

There is a very real chance that Shedeur shows in camp that he should be the starter and then the coaches have to either play him and deal with the media around it, or sit him with fans calling to play him and also deal with the media around it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Wolfman83 said:

Is this fake news? I can't see the tweet or anyone else reporting this, if it was true it would be all over the internet by now.

Looking like it.  Quick review of Schefer X line doesn't show the post

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

 

They were probably so upset because they knew the can of worms it was about to open on them when ownership dictated that pick.

Because there is absolutely a scenario where he goes in there and looks like he might deserve the job.  Flacco has looked decent as a backup the last few years, but one of these seasons he's going to show up to camp and father time will have ended his career.  Pickett sucks and it's not like Gabriel is a can't miss draft pick either.

There is a very real chance that Shedeur shows in camp that he should be the starter and then the coaches have to either play him and deal with the media around it, or sit him with fans calling to play him and also deal with the media around it.

He's definitely winning the job.  Gabriel isn't an nfl qb in my opinion. Flacco will start the season and go 0-4 Pickett will be traded after someone gets hurt in preseason.  I feel like I'm the only one that thinks sanders is an nfl qb. He's immature but he can play.  I don't think work ethic is an issue for him like most of the entitled busts that have come through the league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Wolfman83 said:

Is this fake news? I can't see the tweet or anyone else reporting this, if it was true it would be all over the internet by now.

It could be.  A friend of mine from Ohio (an hour below Cleveland) forwarded it to me--it was apparently making the rounds up there---he believed it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, MrBubba said:

Looking like it.  Quick review of Schefer X line doesn't show the post

I have heard nothing else about it--probably is fake. Apologies if it is--I trusted my friend who sent it to me.  He may have been fooled too.  I did not verify it like I normally do--and I am not on X.  My bad.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...