Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes got booed off the ice


Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, lightsout said:

We will see tomorrow night if Rod and the team received the message. If we're heavily out shot again and not getting pucks on net, I can promise you this series is over. We're not in a spot to win 4 straight 

Perhaps there will be less pressure on the road? 

I don't know. But what we've seen so far is NOT canes hockey. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kuhndog94 said:

Perhaps there will be less pressure on the road? 

I don't know. But what we've seen so far is NOT canes hockey. 

If it wasn’t obvious already I think it’s pretty clear that we don’t match up well with Florida. They do what we do, only way better. And their coach isn’t an idiot who decides to experiment with his lines and call up minor league prospects deep into the postseason. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

If it wasn’t obvious already I think it’s pretty clear that we don’t match up well with Florida. They do what we do, only way better. And their coach isn’t an idiot who decides to experiment with his lines and call up minor league prospects deep into the postseason. 

Well he had to use a "call up" so to speak the issue we have is instead of using the consensus #1 defensive *prospect* a guy whose basically a generational type talent he chose to go with Scott Morrow again.... an AHL quality offense only RHD who was party to 4 goals allowed the game before.....

He also strangley chose to bench KK instead of Roslovic.... 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PantherChris said:

Well he had to use a "call up" so to speak the issue we have is instead of using the consensus #1 defensive *prospect* a guy whose basically a generational type talent he chose to go with Scott Morrow again.... an AHL quality offense only RHD who was party to 4 goals allowed the game before.....

He also strangley chose to bench KK instead of Roslovic.... 

 

That was purely a faceoff circle decision I think 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

Yeah that worked sooooo well, yep lets lose a far better defender and size matchup for....  2 extra face offs.... and then proceed to lose 10% more face offs than game 1

I love rod but he getting out coached in every way possible. Also, Burns lead all defenders with 28 minutes of ice time?  Why not Slavin?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

I love rod but he getting out coached in every way possible. Also, Burns lead all defenders with 28 minutes of ice time?  Why not Slavin?

Even though Morrow ended up with 10 minutes, he basically played 4 d most of the game Walker finished with nine minutes after leaving the game 2 minutes into the second.....

 

Morrow played 5 minutes in the last ten minutes of the third.....

 

WHY WOULD YOU PLAY A GUY ONLY TO BE SO SCARED YOU LEAVE HIM ON THE BENCH EVEN THOUGH YOU ARE DOWN A RIGHT HANDED DEFENSIVE SHOT.....

 

WE PLAYED 4 D BASICALLY HALF THE GAME 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

I love rod but he getting out coached in every way possible. Also, Burns lead all defenders with 28 minutes of ice time?  Why not Slavin?

Ooooof It took me a second but I just realized why Burns played 28 minutes and its even more of an indictment of his horrid decision making.

BRET BURNS PLAYED 28 MINUTES LAST NIGHT 5 MORE THAN ANY OTHER D MAN.

WALKER LEFT 2 MINUTES INTO THE SECOND AND DID NOT RETURN ROD WITH FIVE HEALTHY DEFENSEMEN LEFT 3 LEFT HAND D AND 2 RIGHT HAND D CHOSE TO KEEP MORROW ON THE BENCH UNTIL WE WERE DOWN 5-0 OPTING TO PLAY 40 YEAR OLD BURNS FOR 28 MINUTES AND PLAYING WITH JUST 4 DEFENSEMEN!!!! BECAUSE 

 

BURNS PLAYED 28 MINUTES BECAUSE ROD WAS TOO SCARED TO PLAY THE GUY HE DRESSED OVER A POTENTIAL GAME CHANGER YOU CANT MAKE THIS poo UP.

Edited by PantherChris
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...