One of the dumbest suggestions ever

[45catfan]

On 7/9/2025 at 7:23 PM, SOJA said:

yea the best part about bryce is we haven't paid him yet 

Yet being the best part for now.  I see more similarities in these two other than their height. 

[X-Clown]

On 7/10/2025 at 11:16 AM, DeAngelo Beason said:

Kyler Murray isn't exactly surrounded with talent or quality coaching yet his numbers are solid year after year.

Im not saying Bryce is better but to act like Murrays supporting casts sucks when Hopkins, McBride, and Marvin Harrison Jr are all better than any pass catchers the panthers have put on the field for Bryce in his career thus far is wild to me. Kliff Kingsbury all of a sudden looked like a better offensive mind once he was working with Jayden Daniels instead of Murray.

[Basbear]

Very simple terms with rough numbers.

BY is due 10 million over the next 2 years. *(Panthers already gave signing bonus add another 10mill)

Kyle is due 100 million over the next 2 years.

BY is about to turn 24 years old.

Kyle is about to turn 28 years old.

 

Age and money is a complete win for the BY. BUT I bet, if the names are reversed, not one sane thinking panther fan would trade a 10mill 24 year old Kyle for 100mill 28 year old BY. 

 

If all was equal, I think the clear better option would be Kyle, no hate just plain facts. Kyle has the superior arm and better athletically. BY seems to have a better focus and care for his craft, but last year's comments hurt. Still better than Kyle not caring about knowing the plays in playbook while he's playing 4,000 hours of COD. 

 

Guess what, very very soon BY will need a new contract........ It could be higher than kylers 46mill per....unless BY wins the SB MVP you can count me out of paying him anything around 50million per. At those numbers, just draft one. IMO BY deserves what another 1st overall pick recently got- Baker 3 year 100 million is about it for last 9 game BY.  

[Camp Fodder]

On 7/10/2025 at 9:38 AM, Shotgun said:

No...Murray is too small.

[Davidson Deac II]

I don't really care as much about athleticism and arm strength.  While Murray might be better in that regard, I think Bryce has enough of both to do well in the NFL.

The main reason this trade reference is silly is the money and the fact that Murray has been around a long while and hasn't proven that he can perform consistently when the game is on the line.  Bryce has shown that he can play well in the clutch (in the few opportunities he has had).