Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 College Football Thread


Joe Bear
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, CRA said:

GT with 3 fumbles last year.  2 already tonight and making life easy for Colorado.  Neither forced. 

And despite that CU is only up 7-0 with GT knocking on the door of the redzone. With a quick strike opening score and two gifted turnovers they've really blown a golden opportunity to blow this game wide open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

And despite that CU is only up 7-0 with GT knocking on the door of the redzone. With a quick strike opening score and two gifted turnovers they've really blown a golden opportunity to blow this game wide open.

Yep.  GT with 3 straight turnovers and then backed up on the 1 for the start of the 4th series.  Colorado blew the gifts overall 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hugor Hill said:

App St game just got really sloppy. Charlotte just committed 3 turnovers in their last 4 possessions, and App St has had 2 def players ejected from targeting the last 2 defensive drives.  

I think the college targeting rule (or really the punishment) is the worst in all of sports.  I’d didn’t see these hits but ejection for simply any hit that meets the definition of targeting is just too harsh for me.   

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think the college targeting rule (or really the punishment) is the worst in all of sports.  I’d didn’t see these hits but ejection for simply any hit that meets the definition of targeting is just too harsh for me.   

The hit on Harrell I could see because the player launched into him after he had fumbled the ball and really knocked his azz out. The one before to me, was iffy. If they only had lifted their helmets level and not lowered them, neither one would have been called. Its about fundamentals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think the college targeting rule (or really the punishment) is the worst in all of sports.  I’d didn’t see these hits but ejection for simply any hit that meets the definition of targeting is just too harsh for me.   

Yeah, the penalty is one thing but the automatic ejection seems too much but people would be hollering if it was left up to ref discretion so I get it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...