Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 College Football Thread


Joe Bear
 Share

Recommended Posts

College referees for the National Championship (CFP) earn significant per-game fees, often $10,000 or more, plus travel, as they are paid like NFL-level officials for the biggest games, a big jump from lower-round bowl games ($3,000-$5,000) and regular season games, as they are compensated for their high-stakes, late-season involvement, not an annual salary. 

 

So refs only get 10k for doing a shitt job........what was the line for this game, pre-game and leading?

ugh....

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Basbear said:

College referees for the National Championship (CFP) earn significant per-game fees, often $10,000 or more, plus travel, as they are paid like NFL-level officials for the biggest games, a big jump from lower-round bowl games ($3,000-$5,000) and regular season games, as they are compensated for their high-stakes, late-season involvement, not an annual salary. 

 

So refs only get 10k for doing a shitt job........what was the line for this game, pre-game and leading?

ugh....

Note to self: become a poo ref. Make bank.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Cignetti looks like a psycho.  The mark of a great coach.

There's a  very thin line between being the goat football coach and being a dude in fishnet stockings lowering a bottle of lotion down the hole in your basement to your latest victim.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...