Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 College Football Thread


Joe Bear
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Stumpy said:

If you're defense makes the same stops, kid has to make the same kick except with more pressure. Knowing that if you miss a career long kick, you give the other team the ball back, basically already in FG range with the game in hand.

The caping for Dabo is hilarious. I always forget how many UNC-CH BBall/Clemp football fans there are around these parts.

LOL! I despise Clemson. Just because no one else agrees with you doesn't mean you have to come up with conspiracy theories as for why.

In that situation, I'll take the kid having to run out there and make it on the fly. I said that once I saw them get set with time to spare at that point I may have called a timeout but the ref had probably already checked with Dabo to see if he was gonna call a timeout and may not have even been looking at him at that point. How mad you are over this is pretty funny though, so thanks for that entertainment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

LOL! I despise Clemson. Just because no one else agrees with you doesn't mean you have to come up with conspiracy theories as for why.

In that situation, I'll take the kid having to run out there and make it on the fly. I said that once I saw them get set with time to spare at that point I may have called a timeout but the ref had probably already checked with Dabo to see if he was gonna call a timeout and may not have even been looking at him at that point. How mad you are over this is pretty funny though, so thanks for that entertainment.

If you have time to wait and see if they get set in time before deciding whether to call the timeout, then he didn't have to run out there and make it on the fly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hope he finds his lane in year 2.  Now that we signed Walker, I'm really intrigued how Dan feels about the DL. Is there a piece there in R1 that presents value/BPA and fills a void for one of the spots w/ DB and Wharton.  I'll give Wharton another year to show us why he was signed here. With A'Shawn gone, I don't think BBIII is it.  Our edges are set and our LBs are balanced. Horn/Mike Jack and Moehrig will hold the secondary together. DB is, well...DB.  However, I think this is an area that is the biggest question mark right now. I see 1 of 3 spots that are locked and loaded for us. If we move to a 4 down front, I assume Phillips would slide down to be the additional linemen, but we still have questions about the other two spots in either scheme.  I'd feel better with a tradeback, but I do wonder how McDonald would do here. Maybe Woods....but McDonald really does peek my interest.  Or, can Jackson take that next step. The coaching staff speaks highly of him for what little he played. Here's hoping he stays healthy and comes into TC with something to prove. There's a spot to be taken, here's hoping he takes it.
    • Not many people talking about DT, but we have a need.  (DE)  Now this guy is a NT like Brown III
×
×
  • Create New...