Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The 7 things we’ve learned about the Carolina Panthers in training camp


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, ImfromClayton said:

Man I don’t think we are going to be particularly good, but this does feel like we have an actual NFL roster for the first time in a while. 

if you compared the talk this time of year with the last 2 seasons (what the Panthers were putting out and what we thought).......

It would probably rank

2023

2025

2024

That's why it's hard to buy in.  And our O practices against weak NFL comp so it's always hard to tell.  I really hope Canales borderline overplays our guys this preseason.  Basically everyone not named Brown/Horn.   

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, CRA said:

if you compared the talk this time of year with the last 2 seasons (what the Panthers were putting out and what we thought).......

It would probably rank

2023

2025

2024

That's why it's hard to buy in.  And our O practices against weak NFL comp so it's always hard to tell.  I really hope Canales' borderline overplays our guys this preseason. 

Idunno man.  I feel like that Shaq gif lately and I don't remember feeling this way in a long time.  Maybe I am forgetting the hopium high of 23'.

https://tenor.com/view/yes-ayye-zoom-shoulder-shake-gif-14839794

Edited by BlazeCarolina
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, CRA said:

if you compared the talk this time of year with the last 2 seasons (what the Panthers were putting out and what we thought).......

It would probably rank

2023

2025

2024

That's why it's hard to buy in.  And our O practices against weak NFL comp so it's always hard to tell.  I really hope Canales borderline overplays our guys this preseason.  Basically everyone not named Brown/Horn.   

There's literally nothing they can do during preseason that will make me buy in. Win in September, and then maybe I'll begin to get excited.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BlazeCarolina said:

Idunno man.  I feel like that Shaq gif lately and I don't remember feeling this way in a long time.  Maybe I am forgetting the hopium high of 23'.

https://tenor.com/view/yes-ayye-zoom-shoulder-shake-gif-14839794

2023 was nuts.  That was the all star staff, roster that rivaled 2003, Bryce already operating like a 8 year vet, and on and on.  OL was supposed to build off of that finish w/ Wilks.   It was supposed to be glorious per the hype machine.   

You could start sniffing out the reality though once preseason games started up though that year. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CRA said:

And our O practices against weak NFL comp so it's always hard to tell.  

This is always the conundrum of camp. If this guy or this unit is looking good, is it because he's good or is it because the opposing unit is trash? It makes it even tougher when you're a historically bad team with few proven pieces. I mean, if a youngster is looking good against a proven player or unit that gives you a pretty good measuring stick. We just don't have many good measuring sticks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This is always the conundrum of camp. If this guy or this unit is looking good, is it because he's good or is it because the opposing unit is trash? It makes it even tougher when you're a historically bad team with few proven pieces. I mean, if a youngster is looking good against a proven player or unit that gives you a pretty good measuring stick. We just don't have many good measuring sticks.

it's like taking in the Tmac highlight of the great catch down the sideline.....as he is still largely blanketed by a dude that shouldn't be on the field covering a teams "#1".  How hype can I get.....and the one real question about Tmac is can he separate from NFL DBs. 

Hopefully the Browns play there starters.  That's what I want to see.  

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This is always the conundrum of camp. If this guy or this unit is looking good, is it because he's good or is it because the opposing unit is trash? It makes it even tougher when you're a historically bad team with few proven pieces. I mean, if a youngster is looking good against a proven player or unit that gives you a pretty good measuring stick. We just don't have many good measuring sticks.

I feel like Jaycee Horn is a good one.  Would love to see a compilation of him vs TMac from camp.

Moton is solid.

Still...we talkin' bout practice.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

it's like taking in the Tmac highlight of the great catch down the sideline.....as he is still largely blanketed by a dude that shouldn't be on the field covering a teams "#1".  How hype can I get.....and the one real question about Tmac is can he separate from NFL DBs. 

Hopefully the Browns play there starters.  That's what I want to see.  

I thought we were one of the only teams playing starters like this.  Has that changed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BlazeCarolina said:

I thought we were one of the only teams playing starters like this.  Has that changed?

I have no idea.....I know last year Mahomes, Allen, etc played games 1 and 2 .....and sat the last game.  Carolina basically ran opposite of most (played starters only game 3 and everyone else sat them) 

I would assume we are getting on the more normal train of thought this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, TD alt said:

There's literally nothing they can do during preseason that will make me buy in. Win in September, and then maybe I'll begin to get excited.

I've seen this movie,the remake, the prequel etc far too many times.   Just fuging win and stop with the goddamn lip service.  Every32 teams are putting out poo like this just go 2-2 after the first 4 and then let's talk

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BlazeCarolina said:

I thought we were one of the only teams playing starters like this.  Has that changed?

It definitely sounds like it so far. Rams, Falcons announced they won’t be playing most starters. Browns don’t know who QB1 is so i think most will play, obviously don’t expect myles g. Out there or other stars, but they should play some starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...