Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cherelus down. We need to be talking about LBs even more


TD alt
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

The dude for the Colts was really good for a few years, I forgot his name. 

I know that Luke was a unicorn. That said, instead of finding even above average LB play in the middle has not been on the teams to do list, and it's shown. We went from one end of the spectrum to the other, and I really, really hate it. There is nothing more beautiful than seeing an ILB just blast out of nowhere into the backfield to chase a back to the sideline. Or take off upfield against a tight end and bat a ball away. 

As I said though, we have a Top 7 corner in the league, and we finished with the worst defense in NFL history. For everyone saying that corner is more important than defensive linemen and the interior of the defense, you're crazy. College corners are more important because the hashes are wider and you've got more ground to cover. In the NFL, the play action is condensed and that middle of the defense becomes that much more important.

Note, Sweisenger is going to be the next great MLB in the league. He may not be Luke but he is that quintessential type of dude. 

Leonard had three good seasons and his best year was his rookie season... he put up comparable stats to Luke his first year but he didn't elevate the indy defense the way luke did ours.

 

As a former linebacker and someone who two out of my 3 favorite all time Panthers were MLBs I agree with you whole heartedly (Luke and Dan) a true Elite MLB is the field general and tone setter of a defense.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Luke absolutely was. He was almost as important as a quarterback. I don't know if they quantify wins and losses attributed to linebacker but if they do, Luke was undervalued. He was a top 10 player in the league for years, and should be a first ballot Hall of Famer. Had Luke played for the Ravens, he undoubtedly would have been a first ballot. 

Instead he languished here, and ultimately helped build a culture which the two Dave's worked to ruin. 

I dont know about wins because you still have to score but adding just Luke in the Middle was worth a minimum of 10 spots in defensive rankings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

I dont know about wins because you still have to score but adding just Luke in the Middle was worth a minimum of 10 spots in defensive rankings.

It sure was. I went back and re-watched the 2015 playoffs as well. I don't recall ever seeing a stretch of MLB play like that in the NFL. That was better than anything I saw out of Urlacher or Lewis, and both of those guys were great but they were also surrounded by greatness. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, shaq said:

The one undeniable mistake Dan Morgan has made was letting Frankie Luvu walk last offseason. We had developed him into one of the best LBS in the league and let him walk in his prime for nothing in return, dude was just an All Pro last season. 

Yeah. But they did try to sign him. He just chose DC over Carolina. In hindsight, it was a GREAT decision by him.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

Leonard had three good seasons and his best year was his rookie season... he put up comparable stats to Luke his first year but he didn't elevate the indy defense the way luke did ours.

 

As a former linebacker and someone who two out of my 3 favorite all time Panthers were MLBs I agree with you whole heartedly (Luke and Dan) a true Elite MLB is the field general and tone setter of a defense.

I really, really, really agree with this. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm talking about how you get all emo and have to grossly oversimplify everyone else's takes because you don't have the mental horsepower to actually argue against them and you have to resort to exactly this type of embarrassing tactics where you desperately try to come off as intelligent but end up coming across like a juvenile midwit.

Just make your points and don't take it so personal when people disagree. Good grief, man. We're just talking about football. It's gonna be alright.

You obviously have a problem with people making a point and supporting a point. The ONLY thing that I have taken personal in this place is personal attacks.

In my experience, the only ones that question a person's intelligence and use terms like "midwit," are those that take things personally and have questionable intelligence themselves. I already know that I'm intelligent, and some twit on a message board isn't going to change my mind. 

If you don't want to discuss football-related issues on a football message board, then why are you here? That's a rhetorical question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, no one has mentioned how banged up Cherelus is.

Second, even if he is out for an extended time period, he's replaceable. Bam, Barnes, or Windmon (or another team's cut) gonna need to step up. Even the article quoted by OP says:

"To be fair, for now this is probably a bigger deal for Carolina's special teams unit than for their defense. Last year Cherelus only played 17% of the team's defensive snaps. Still, even though Cherelus was only a backup's backup at linebacker, it's not like this group could afford to lose anybody heading into the preseason"

TBF: Cherelus WAS reportedly having a good camp. but still...

Edited by shaqattaq
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Yeah. But they did try to sign him. He just chose DC over Carolina. In hindsight, it was a GREAT decision by him.

it was a good decision. It was reported that the Panthers offered slightly better money as well. Some say that Washington's scheme fit was better suited for him as well. 

And to think, he was a UDFA turned journeyman...

Edited by TD alt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TD alt said:

You obviously have a problem with people making a point and supporting a point. The ONLY thing that I have taken personal in this place is personal attacks.

In my experience, the only ones that question a person's intelligence and use terms like "midwit," are those that take things personally and have questionable intelligence themselves. I already know that I'm intelligent, and some twit on a message board isn't going to change my mind. 

If you don't want to discuss football-related issues on a football message board, then why are you here? That's a rhetorical question.

LOL

You really should reflect back on your own posts and then your own advice from this post.

It just cracks me up watching you come up with these pitches that evidently you think everyone is going to find brilliant, few agree, then watch as your frustration escalated to sell it and then you ultimately resort to this stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Warm body needs to be replaced by another warm body...

The 2 LBers down appear to me as an opportunity more than a negative. Jewell wasn't much and Cherelus hasn't done anything much. Seems like more of an opportunity than anything to me.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

LOL

You really should reflect back on your own posts and then your own advice from this post.

It just cracks me up watching you come up with these pitches that evidently you think everyone is going to find brilliant, few agree, then watch as your frustration escalated to sell it and then you ultimately resort to this stuff.

I came up with a post regarding our weak LB situation getting even weaker. It's not "brilliant," it's just a fact. The fact that you would even suggest that just goes to show that you have personal issues with me. Don't read my damned posts if they bother you so much. 

Have I ever cared if "few people" agree with me or not? But you can say "few people" all you like. That certainly doesn't make it true.

The only person, and moderator to boot, that resorts to "this stuff" is you. You're the resident moderator troll to be honest. You shouldn't even be a moderator because you take things too personally, love to call names, and are obviously not even-keeled in temperament which is what makes a great mod. 

Edited by TD alt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TD alt said:

I came up with a post regarding our weak LB situation getting even weaker. It's not "brilliant," it's just a fact. The fact that you would even suggest that just goes to show that you have personal issues with me. Don't read my damned posts if they bother you so much. 

Have I ever cared if "few people" agree with me or not. But you can say "few people" all you like. That certainly doesn't make it true.

The only person, and moderator to boot, that resorts to "this stuff" is you. You're the resident moderator troll to be honest. You shouldn't even be a moderator because you take things too personally, love to call names, and are obviously not even-keeled in temperament which is what makes a great mod. 

I'm just pointing out what you always do. Yeah, everyone knows LB is a weak spot. Most fans just realize that we're highly unlikely to make any moves until other teams start trimming their rosters and more bodies become available.

But you always resort to this type of woe is woe is me stuff mischaracterizing the arguments of others and insinuating that they just couldn't comprehend the intelligence of your viewpoint when people don't come rushing to acknowledge your brilliance.

7 hours ago, TD alt said:

What I learned from this thread: any ol' linebacker off the waiver wire will do when it comes to backups. They all come with the same strengths and weakness, and are basically carbon copy throwaways. Equally of no importance, is their importance on special teams. 

That's it, that's all man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm just pointing out what you always do. Yeah, everyone knows LB is a weak spot. Most fans just realize that we're highly unlikely to make any moves until other teams start trimming their rosters and more bodies become available.

But you always resort to this type of woe is woe is me stuff mischaracterizing the arguments of others and insinuating that they just couldn't comprehend the intelligence of your viewpoint when people don't come rushing to acknowledge your brilliance.

That's it, that's all man. 

"I guess we'll see come cuts." I wonder what that could possibly mean.

Politics Reaction GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TD alt said:

"I guess we'll see come cuts." I wonder what that could possibly mean.

Politics Reaction GIF

It means that we're going to be diving in the dumpster bin for LBs. A reality that most fans came to grips with long ago. You want to make a splash move at LB, I get it. It's just that for most Panthers fans we've been watching this organization make knee jerk moves trying to assemble the best bad team they can duct tape together with seemingly no long-term vision. Most of us are ready to move past that approach. LB is going to be a weak spot this year. That's a better situation that the DL and pass rush being a weak spot and that's why we spent this off-season focusing on DL and pass rush. We also signed a premium FA safety and drafted a mid-round safety who are good in the box defenders. The D should be greatly improved. Is it going to be a top 10 unit? Highly unlikely. The goal is try to go from bottom of the barrel to middle of the pack. We weren't fixing everything in one off-season and we made the strategic call that off the ball LBs are the easier spot to find stop gap players and we spent cap space and draft picks trying to fill more premium needs.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...