Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Join me in betting against the Panthers this season


Super Grateful
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is a prime example of why to never bet.....

Plus I never got betting against "your" favorite team, what in holy balls is that?!?!?

But I also don't like telling others how to live, just a bizarre timeline with all this legal gambling..... My money came too hard to be used on a degenerate dopamine pulse for...betting against ones team.... 

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Basbear said:

This is a prime example of why to never bet.....

Plus I never got betting against "your" favorite team, what in holy balls is that?!?!?

But I also don't like telling others how to live, just a bizarre timeline with all this legal gambling..... My money came too hard to be used on a degenerate dopamine pulse for...betting against ones team.... 

I cashed this one for 500 at halftime..  

 

Used this bonus bet to bet against us... (only did it one time this year) I made a killing betting bigger spreads on us the last two years...  as for why? The team was very very bad and if they win im happy...  if they lose IM STILL HAPPY BECAUSE I MADE $

Screenshot_20251130_153622_FanDuel Sportsbook.jpg

Screenshot_20251201_170555_bet365.jpg

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Basbear said:

This is a prime example of why to never bet.....

Plus I never got betting against "your" favorite team, what in holy balls is that?!?!?

Eh, I get what you mean, but it is more like don't bet what you can't afford to lose.  Not like I dropped a band on it haha

I love the Panthers.  Been to all the games.  I do a good job separating betting from fandom.  It isn't like I was rooting for the Panthers to lose - I'd much rather lose money and the Panthers win than vice versa.

I get why it would rub some the wrong way though.  I was being more facetious than anything else - nothing is free money in sports, especially the NFL.  Everyone should bet responsibly.  

Edited by Mage
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

I cashed this one for 500 at halftime..  

 

Used this bonus bet to bet against us... (only did it one time this year) I made a killing betting bigger spreads on us the last two years...  as for why? The team was very very bad and if they win im happy...  if they lose IM STILL HAPPY BECAUSE I MADE $

Screenshot_20251130_153622_FanDuel Sportsbook.jpg

Screenshot_20251201_170555_bet365.jpg

 

Last year was "free" money unlike this year, I member big katt cleaning up with others. My Brain just isn't wired to do it. Yea gambling and winning is a tough sell, cause its not a "problem". Go for it, so long no others are harmed once the losing happens. Ive heard form others, they can no longer watch games unless money is on the line. 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Basbear said:

 

Last year was "free" money unlike this year, I member big katt cleaning up with others. My Brain just isn't wired to do it. Yea gambling and winning is a tough sell, cause its not a "problem". Go for it, so long no others are harmed once the losing happens. Ive heard for others, they can no longer watch games unless money is on the line. 

Its easy don't bet what you can't afford, I'm up around 45k in two years and I haven't put anything into other than the initial deposits to get the sign up bonuses.... (I own my own business and as a consequence only work two days a month so its a fun hobby for me)  its absolutely bad for most people just because I'm one of the 3% who make money doesn't mean anyone should do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

Last year was "free" money unlike this year, I member big katt cleaning up with others. My Brain just isn't wired to do it. Yea gambling and winning is a tough sell, cause its not a "problem". Go for it, so long no others are harmed once the losing happens. Ive heard form others, they can no longer watch games unless money is on the line. 

From the moment Big Kat said the following he lost 7 of 9.

Here’s your chance to be debt free…. Always and I mean ALWAYS bet against the Carolina Panthers

 

 

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mage said:

Eh, I get what you mean, but it is more like don't bet what you can't afford to lose.  Not like I dropped a band on it haha

I love the Panthers.  Been to all the games.  I do a good job separating betting from fandom.  It isn't like I was rooting for the Panthers to lose - I'd much rather lose money and the Panthers win than vice versa.

I get why it would rub some the wrong way though.  I was being more facetious than anything else - nothing is free money in sports, especially the NFL.  Everyone should bet responsibly.  

Brother, there is a list of stuff I do not understand that is nearly touching the moon. (it started with bottle water...). Gambling is no different, but Im just more confused at betting against your favorite team. It is ultra tough for some to remain responsible, short story- knew a family friend that owned a truss building business, he gambled away millions and died owing many people. I had a correction officer and he told it was impossible to prevent inmates form gambling. "They will bet on which fly leaves first or which water drops first". 

But I also try my best to live by not telling others how they spend their money, if you're not hurting anyone physically or mentally and its not costing me money, its none of my dam business. 

I even recently read about a true sick man-    Terrance Watanabe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrance_Watanabe

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Basbear said:

 

Last year was "free" money unlike this year, I member big katt cleaning up with others. My Brain just isn't wired to do it. Yea gambling and winning is a tough sell, cause its not a "problem". Go for it, so long no others are harmed once the losing happens. Ive heard form others, they can no longer watch games unless money is on the line. 

Yeah everything comes to an end. And if you think you have Vegas figured out, like how to beat them, be careful. 
 

It is irrational to think about betting this way, totally superstitious. But the up down up down or black/red phenomenon of alternating results is killing it p, maybe for the last 5-6 weeks. And you know that is gonna end too. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If someone is telling you how to get rich, 9.9999 times out of 10 you are going to get taken for a ride and they will likely end up broke.

Pro teams getting in bed with Veges will only lead to a richer NFL and a richer Veges built on the backs of people losing money.  

Love the guy who said to only bet what you can afford to lose.  Agree 100.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

If someone is telling you how to get rich, 9.9999 times out of 10 you are going to get taken for a ride and they will likely end up broke.

Pro teams getting in bed with Veges will only lead to a richer NFL and a richer Veges built on the backs of people losing money.  

Love the guy who said to only bet what you can afford to lose.  Agree 100.

I use to work the late nights and sports talk had a great show hosted by Ben Maller. He called himself a degenerate gambler. He had a segment where he bet against coin flips, more than a few times the coin would win that days games and stay ahead of his picks. Funny stuff, callers made the show good too.

He also had a get rich idea and shared it with the listeners. He said - " Send me one dollar in the mail and I'll send you the secret to getting rich " ' He'd send you back a piece of paper saying to ask people for money advice by sending you money ".  

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...